29.12.2013 Views

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and to Jefferson he wrote that it “has some curious features.” 85 It is however<br />

known from a letter of Randolph to Humphreys that President Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

gave <strong>in</strong>structions for redeem<strong>in</strong>g the captives at a “limit of three thousand<br />

dollars per man”—we are here far away from Jefferson’s $100-200 apiece<br />

offered <strong>in</strong> 1786—but this appears nowhere <strong>in</strong> the treaty. 86<br />

The customary<br />

presents were not <strong>in</strong>cluded either, they were counted as regalian rights, or<br />

privileges attached to office, and were one of two po<strong>in</strong>ts the Dey <strong>in</strong>sisted on—<br />

besides naval material. Those <strong>in</strong>cluded a presents valued at $20,000 on the<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g of a new consul and biennial presents to officers of government<br />

estimated at $17,000. 87 For <strong>in</strong>significant annuities <strong>in</strong> naval stores, presents on<br />

arrival of a new ambassador, and biennial presents Algiers opened its markets<br />

and guaranteed the <strong>in</strong>terests of an American Mediterranean trade that,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to O’Brien, was mak<strong>in</strong>g profits of $1.5 million a year. 88 Overall, the<br />

document was most favorable for the United States; one may even affirm that it<br />

was a one-sided treaty. Apart from the above mentioned payments that were<br />

not even written <strong>in</strong> the treaty and which later became a matter of controversy<br />

and cheat<strong>in</strong>g, Algiers had all to lose by the terms of treaty.<br />

A quick look at the provisions of the treaty shows that n<strong>in</strong>eteen out of<br />

the twenty-two articles did not provide for reciprocity: 89 except from articles 3,<br />

4 and 19 which provided for immunity from capture on presentation of a<br />

85 LWJM, 2:82, To James Monroe, Feby 26, 1796 and ibid, 2:85, To Thomas Jefferson, Feb. 29, 1796<br />

respectively.<br />

86 ASP/FA, 1:529, Secretary of State to Colonel Humphreys, August 25, 1794.<br />

87 Bassett, Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of American Diplomacy, p. 108; ASP/FA, 3:33.<br />

88 As cited <strong>in</strong> Allison, The Crescent Obscured, p. 160.<br />

89 These remarks are based on the orig<strong>in</strong>al translation of 1795. Wherever flagrant disparities appear<br />

between the orig<strong>in</strong>al translation and that of 1830, parentheses are used for the purpose.<br />

319

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!