29.12.2013 Views

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

accord<strong>in</strong>g to which the draft treaties were molded. Up to 1785, confusion was<br />

such that accreditation letters of the commissioned agents had to be corrected<br />

to take <strong>in</strong>to account the titles of the Barbary sovereigns. 127 But despite that, and<br />

contrary to the cunn<strong>in</strong>g European states, the United States atta<strong>in</strong>ed peace<br />

treaties <strong>with</strong> the easy-go<strong>in</strong>g Muslims states of North Africa relatively easily,<br />

albeit later, but only after it gave those hard times. With Morocco, for example,<br />

Congress chose to ignore, or at least not to answer correspondence of various<br />

agents who were act<strong>in</strong>g on behalf of its ruler. As early as 1778 the K<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

“will<strong>in</strong>g to sign a treaty of peace and commerce” and had literally to ‘<strong>in</strong>vite’<br />

them repeatedly for mak<strong>in</strong>g peace before they conceded to start negotiations <strong>in</strong><br />

1786. 128 Negotiations nonetheless were successful and Morocco became the<br />

first non-European country to sign a treaty of commerce and amity <strong>with</strong> the<br />

USA <strong>in</strong> 1787.<br />

Of the four North African states, however, the road to a treaty <strong>with</strong><br />

Algiers was the longest and most <strong>in</strong>tricate. The reasons were numerous: the<br />

American m<strong>in</strong>isters were already apprehensive about Algiers as they had<br />

already reported it as be<strong>in</strong>g “the most formidable of the piratical states,”<br />

therefore they anticipated that “the price of their peace” would be higher. 129<br />

Probably that stand expla<strong>in</strong>s why the Americans decided to put an abrupt end<br />

to negotiations <strong>with</strong> Algiers shortly after they started. Negotiations also<br />

127 USDC, 1:502; LDC, 22:243, Charles Thomson to John Jay, March 3, 1785.<br />

128 USRDC, 4:170-71, From D’Audibert Caille to Jay, April 21, 1780; DCAR, 4:135-136, Giacomo F.<br />

Crocco to B. Frankl<strong>in</strong>, July 15, 1783.<br />

129 Ibid., 1:576, Fifth Report of the Commissioners to Congress, Addressed to John Jay, Secretary For<br />

Foreign Affairs, April 13, 1785.<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!