29.12.2013 Views

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

Ottoman Algeria in Western Diplomatic History with ... - Bibliothèque

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was due to the despotic character of the Deys who became less tolerant of the<br />

lies and duplicity of the petty consuls and their countries.<br />

By late 18 th and early 19 th centuries, however, tribute acquired another<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g: it became synonymous of extortion or protection money. 68 While the<br />

Deys saw that it was the duty of consuls and their countries to present gifts, the<br />

Europeans “stress[ed] that gifts were not regular tributes” therefore they were<br />

“not expressive of European obedience.” 69 Undoubtedly, this ambiguity about<br />

the nature of tribute and consular practice attached to it resulted more from<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> cultural background and legal traditions than from any particular<br />

<strong>in</strong>satiability on the part of the Deys. It is also illustrative of the complexity of<br />

diplomatic relations between Algiers and the European countries.<br />

2. 4. Slavery and Redemption<br />

By the end of the 18 th century, the question of captives was already<br />

settled even though irregularities persisted. The different treaties between<br />

Algiers and the European countries <strong>in</strong>corporated the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of ransom or<br />

exchange of captives and the practice was largely accepted. A whole system of<br />

government or private <strong>in</strong>stitutions, procedures, and regulations was developed<br />

for the purpose. While el-fekkak or redeemer acted on the part of Algiers for<br />

68 This view was expressed early <strong>in</strong> American history by Benjam<strong>in</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong> and echoed widely by<br />

American writers who largely disprove of the practice. The <strong>Diplomatic</strong> Correspondence of the<br />

American Revolution, be<strong>in</strong>g the Letters of Benjam<strong>in</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong>, Silas Deane, John Adams, John Jay, and<br />

others, edited by Jared Sparks (Boston, MA: N. Hale and Gray & Bowen, 1829-1830), 4:184, Frankl<strong>in</strong><br />

to the President of Congress, December 25, 1783. (Hereafter cited as DCAR); also see James A. Field,<br />

Jr. “Trade, Skills, and Sympathy: The First Century and a Half of Commerce <strong>with</strong> the Near East,”<br />

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 401, America and the Middle<br />

East, (May, 1972), p. 2; Froth<strong>in</strong>gham, “The Armed Merchantman,” p. 465; Oren, Power, Faith, and<br />

Fantasy, p. 19-20.<br />

69 Muller, Consuls, Corsairs, and Commerce, p. 59.<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!