Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...
Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...
Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Summary of Public Comments - Managing Recreation Uses in the<br />
Upper Segment of the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River Corridor EA<br />
it and non-recreation ORVs. This discretion may include restricting or prohibiting a recreational<br />
activity, a number of recreational activities or, perhaps in rare circumstances, all recreation use<br />
within a section (subsection) of the designated component. Through the institution of restrictions<br />
or prohibitions in certain sections of the river, the administering agency may balance recreation<br />
uses of the river corridor to protect and enhance all ORVs, free-flow and water quality for the<br />
entire designated component. Any limitations need to be based on achieving the desired<br />
conditions for recreation and protection of non-recreation ORVs, free-flow and water quality. The<br />
preferred alternative is designed to enhance boating by expanding the boating opportunities while<br />
at the same time protecting the non-boating experience in the upper segment of the Chattooga<br />
WSR.<br />
Q) Section 6(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) specifically prohibits the use of<br />
condemnation for fee title purchase of private lands if 50 percent or more of the acreage within<br />
the boundaries on both sides of the designated river are in public ownership (federal, state, or<br />
local government). In addition, Section 6(a) (1) of the Act prohibits acquiring more than 100<br />
acres per river mile within the corridor, which is approximately 50 acres on either side of the river<br />
bank. Fee title condemnation is allowed to clear title or to acquire conservation, scenic, or other<br />
types of easements reasonably necessary for public access. The objective of Wild and Scenic<br />
River designation is to protect and, as possible, enhance the values which caused the river to be<br />
designated. Should some proposed or actual use clearly threaten the Outstandingly Remarkable<br />
Values which resulted in the river's designation, negotiated efforts will be pursued to remove the<br />
threat through local zoning, state provisions, land exchanges, purchases on a willingseller/willing-buyer<br />
basis, and other actions short of condemnation. Purchasing a partial right<br />
(easement) or the property in fee title is usually the last resort. If an easement is purchased, the<br />
owner will sell certain development rights and receive a payment, yet retain title to the land.<br />
Where an exchange, scenic easement, or voluntary purchase cannot be negotiated and an activity<br />
(actual or proposed) threatens or significantly degrades river values or the associated area, the<br />
government could pursue condemnation so as to protect the river values which led to designation.<br />
Condemnation is rarely used by the federal government and is the last option in protecting the<br />
values for which the river was designated. (Source: Interagency Wild & Scenic Rivers Council).<br />
The issue of navigability and the rights of the public with respect to this section has not been<br />
adjudicated by a court of law. No federal or state agency or authority has officially determined or<br />
specifically opined as to whether this section of the river is navigable and thus subject to general<br />
public use without permission.1 According to FSM 2354.14 - Navigability of Rivers, “Most<br />
rivers in the country have not been adjudicated as navigable or non-navigable. Consider them<br />
non-navigable until adjudicated otherwise.” The North Carolina Attorney General appears to be<br />
the proper state authority to provide an opinion regarding navigability of the river pursuant to<br />
state law. Ultimately, however, the authority to determine navigability resides exclusively with<br />
the federal and state courts. North Carolina law provides that a river that can be navigated for<br />
“pleasure boating” in its natural condition is navigable-in-fact and therefore navigable-in-law.<br />
Such waters are subject to the public trust doctrine, which authorizes the public to use the waters<br />
for recreational purposes such as swimming and fishing.<br />
Sample Public Comment(s) for PC 26:<br />
Subconcern # A<br />
Someone in the <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Service</strong> is using tax payers money to break federal law, preventing the public from<br />
using federal land (which is paid for and owned by the United States Citizens). (Ltr# 44, Cmt# 1)<br />
Subconcern # B<br />
The U.S. <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Service</strong> recently released a Draft Environmental Assessment aimed at continuing the 35<br />
year-old ban on paddling (canoeing, kayaking, and rafting) on the Upper Chattooga River in North<br />
Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The agency is essentially trying to invent a new management<br />
practice that excludes paddlers. The area is already protected as a Wild and Scenic River and as a<br />
81