29.12.2013 Views

Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...

Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...

Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary of Public Comments - Managing Recreation Uses in the<br />

Upper Segment of the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River Corridor EA<br />

it and non-recreation ORVs. This discretion may include restricting or prohibiting a recreational<br />

activity, a number of recreational activities or, perhaps in rare circumstances, all recreation use<br />

within a section (subsection) of the designated component. Through the institution of restrictions<br />

or prohibitions in certain sections of the river, the administering agency may balance recreation<br />

uses of the river corridor to protect and enhance all ORVs, free-flow and water quality for the<br />

entire designated component. Any limitations need to be based on achieving the desired<br />

conditions for recreation and protection of non-recreation ORVs, free-flow and water quality. The<br />

preferred alternative is designed to enhance boating by expanding the boating opportunities while<br />

at the same time protecting the non-boating experience in the upper segment of the Chattooga<br />

WSR.<br />

Q) Section 6(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) specifically prohibits the use of<br />

condemnation for fee title purchase of private lands if 50 percent or more of the acreage within<br />

the boundaries on both sides of the designated river are in public ownership (federal, state, or<br />

local government). In addition, Section 6(a) (1) of the Act prohibits acquiring more than 100<br />

acres per river mile within the corridor, which is approximately 50 acres on either side of the river<br />

bank. Fee title condemnation is allowed to clear title or to acquire conservation, scenic, or other<br />

types of easements reasonably necessary for public access. The objective of Wild and Scenic<br />

River designation is to protect and, as possible, enhance the values which caused the river to be<br />

designated. Should some proposed or actual use clearly threaten the Outstandingly Remarkable<br />

Values which resulted in the river's designation, negotiated efforts will be pursued to remove the<br />

threat through local zoning, state provisions, land exchanges, purchases on a willingseller/willing-buyer<br />

basis, and other actions short of condemnation. Purchasing a partial right<br />

(easement) or the property in fee title is usually the last resort. If an easement is purchased, the<br />

owner will sell certain development rights and receive a payment, yet retain title to the land.<br />

Where an exchange, scenic easement, or voluntary purchase cannot be negotiated and an activity<br />

(actual or proposed) threatens or significantly degrades river values or the associated area, the<br />

government could pursue condemnation so as to protect the river values which led to designation.<br />

Condemnation is rarely used by the federal government and is the last option in protecting the<br />

values for which the river was designated. (Source: Interagency Wild & Scenic Rivers Council).<br />

The issue of navigability and the rights of the public with respect to this section has not been<br />

adjudicated by a court of law. No federal or state agency or authority has officially determined or<br />

specifically opined as to whether this section of the river is navigable and thus subject to general<br />

public use without permission.1 According to FSM 2354.14 - Navigability of Rivers, “Most<br />

rivers in the country have not been adjudicated as navigable or non-navigable. Consider them<br />

non-navigable until adjudicated otherwise.” The North Carolina Attorney General appears to be<br />

the proper state authority to provide an opinion regarding navigability of the river pursuant to<br />

state law. Ultimately, however, the authority to determine navigability resides exclusively with<br />

the federal and state courts. North Carolina law provides that a river that can be navigated for<br />

“pleasure boating” in its natural condition is navigable-in-fact and therefore navigable-in-law.<br />

Such waters are subject to the public trust doctrine, which authorizes the public to use the waters<br />

for recreational purposes such as swimming and fishing.<br />

Sample Public Comment(s) for PC 26:<br />

Subconcern # A<br />

Someone in the <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Service</strong> is using tax payers money to break federal law, preventing the public from<br />

using federal land (which is paid for and owned by the United States Citizens). (Ltr# 44, Cmt# 1)<br />

Subconcern # B<br />

The U.S. <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Service</strong> recently released a Draft Environmental Assessment aimed at continuing the 35<br />

year-old ban on paddling (canoeing, kayaking, and rafting) on the Upper Chattooga River in North<br />

Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The agency is essentially trying to invent a new management<br />

practice that excludes paddlers. The area is already protected as a Wild and Scenic River and as a<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!