29.12.2013 Views

Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...

Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...

Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary of Public Comments - Managing Recreation Uses in the<br />

Upper Segment of the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River Corridor EA<br />

for in considering possible additional erosion in the Chattooga corridor. At least one boater access trail<br />

does not currently exist. If constructed, it must adhere to BMPs for trails along with all other affected<br />

access trails. (Ltr# 107, Cmt# 2)<br />

Subconcern # D K L P<br />

If you are bound and determined to approve Alternative 12 please amend it as follows: Amend the area for<br />

boating from January 15 to March 1 to from Burrell’s Ford Bridge to the downstream edge of the Gorge<br />

area at the falls where the Thrift Lake parking area trail in South Carolina reaches the Chattooga; Add a<br />

rule that at no time will boaters approach within 30 feet of fishermen, hikers, or other boaters who are<br />

already floating the river unless those already in the river (such as those who are capsized or have fallen<br />

out of their boats) are in distress and need rescuing. If they don’t want to wait for others to finish fishing a<br />

run and clear the water before continuing downstream they may portage around them. This will ensure the<br />

safety of wading fishermen and hikers, or boaters who are also resting or fishing and also provide less<br />

disruption to fishermen; and Please add a specific description of how you will address the current law<br />

enforcement needs and future increase in law enforcement needs on the Chattooga River above the<br />

Highway 28 bridge if boating is allowed. (Ltr# 135, Cmt# 5)<br />

Subconcern # D K M N O<br />

We suggest the following if Alternative #12 is implemented: Strict enforcement of all regulations to include<br />

significant increases in fines for all violations. More personnel are needed to patrol the river. In addition,<br />

all citizens should be provided with information to report suspected violations. Consider "reversing" the<br />

planned dates for boating to better avoid possible conflicts. Continue to monitor woody debris especially in<br />

the "newly designated" boating sections to insure that the health of the river is maintained. Closely monitor<br />

road and parking conditions during boating periods. Heavy road use during wet periods and limited<br />

parking space can lead to increases in sediment run off. (Ltr# 112, Cmt# 1)<br />

Subconcern # E<br />

I support Option 12 put forward by the <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Service</strong> for the Chattooga River. This is the fairest<br />

option for all concerned and has both fishers and boaters making sacrifices. (Ltr# 53, Cmt# 1)<br />

Subconcern # E G<br />

I believe the legislation governing the river supports a management regime that allows for significant<br />

providence of boater-free angling. Therefore, I support Alternative 12, as presented in the 2011 Draft<br />

Environmental Assessment. I believe it is a reasonable and lawful compromise that will allow both<br />

paddlers and anglers to enjoy this unique and beautiful reach. Further, I welcome the efforts to manage all<br />

uses in the river to reduce the impacts from social trails and camping areas. (Ltr# 105, Cmt# 2)<br />

Subconcern # E-I<br />

A key goal for many was protecting the solitude and wilderness experience as the current zoning for foot<br />

travel only above Highway 28 has for over 30 years. The SC Council of TU supports the many members<br />

and chapters that prefer that this successful zoning be continued (Alternative #3). However, the SC Council<br />

finds Alternative #12 from the <strong>US</strong>FS study as an acceptable compromise that is fair to all stakeholders and<br />

should not harm the fisheries. We hope that other resource users will join TU in support of Alternative #12<br />

to help the <strong>US</strong>FS resolve this controversial issue and move on to more productive efforts. ...Establishing<br />

backcountry capacities to minimize encounters between boaters and anglers, reducing campsite density to<br />

maximize opportunities for a solitude experience for all, and providing boaters opportunities to float the<br />

upper river when flow levels are best suited for their interests are all well thought out solutions supported<br />

in Alternative #12. Equally important, is the wise prohibition of removal of large woody debris from the<br />

river which is very important to the health of the fishery as an integral part of the intricate food chain.<br />

Valuing the fishery over navigability concerns is to be commended as it is in keeping with the many years<br />

of work to improve the fishery by the <strong>US</strong>FS and others working together in the ‘Chattooga Coalition’ which<br />

has met annually since formation during the 3 year macro-invertebrate study in the late 1980s that TU was<br />

a major participant in, including providing funding and manpower. (Ltr# 127, Cmt# 1)<br />

Subconcern # F-I<br />

While most of our members would have preferred the continued operation with Alterative #3, we can<br />

accept the Alternative # 12, which will establish backcountry capacities to minimize encounters between<br />

boaters and anglers, reduce campsite density to maximize opportunities for a solitude experience for all,<br />

provide boaters floating the upper river when flow levels are best suited for their interests and most<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!