Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...
Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...
Resource Name (Heading 1) - USDA Forest Service - US ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Summary of Public Comments - Managing Recreation Uses in the<br />
Upper Segment of the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River Corridor EA<br />
shoreline, and damaging the bottom of the riverbed with their boots. Hikers camp along the river and leave<br />
their trace behind with trash and destroyed vegetation from their campsites. The only trails paddlers use<br />
are the trails to the put in, take out and the occasional need to scout and portage an unsafe rapid. I don't<br />
see any trails along Section 3 and Section 4 created by paddlers that damage the river and its<br />
surroundings. The paddlers that will come to paddle the river will do so in small numbers as it requires<br />
exceptional skills and lower number of days of reliable flow to run the sections included in the waterways<br />
north of Highway 28. (Ltr# 180, Cmt# 1)<br />
Subconcern # B<br />
I wish to express my support to reopening the Chattooga River upstream of GA Hwy. 28 at Russell Bridge<br />
to private boating without limitation, as is lawfully permitted in the eastern United States on all other<br />
rivers flowing through U. S. <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Service</strong> lands. I see no reasonable justification for limiting boater's<br />
access, though future studies might convincingly provide such. There is no human use of the Chattooga<br />
Headwaters which promises less physical impact on the river and its riparian environment than private<br />
boating, and there is no public group which is more interested in preserving the wilderness character of the<br />
headwaters area and able to do so more than experienced river boaters. (Ltr# 186, Cmt# 1)<br />
Subconcern # B<br />
#138- In many ways, paddling is the best and lowest impact way to access this area. This was true in 1971<br />
when the Chattooga Study Report declared when speaking of the Chattooga above Highway 28: “Rafting<br />
or some method of floating is the best way to see this rugged portion of the river. Many of the pools and<br />
canyon-enclosed sections are 10-20 feet deep and impossible to wade by hikers and fishermen.” (Ltr# 193,<br />
Cmt# 131)<br />
Subconcern # B<br />
#480- The EA lacks even the most basic description of the Upper Chattooga River as a boating resource.<br />
The reaches that the <strong>US</strong>FS allowed to be paddled during the one-time, two day assessment were rated very<br />
highly by paddlers, and all the same scenery and solitude opportunities appreciated by anglers are also<br />
appreciated by boaters. Perhaps the main difference is that the experience of boaters is of a natural river,<br />
where as artificially stocked fish are critical to angler’s experiences. The <strong>US</strong>FS has no basis to claim that<br />
the Upper Chattooga provides an angling experience that is any more unique, powerful, or important than<br />
a paddling experience. To make such a claim - especially on page 1 - is inequitable and arbitrary and<br />
capricious. (Ltr# 193, Cmt# 467)<br />
Subconcern # B C<br />
Also, if this section where opened to boating it would allow some of the longest multi-day trips in the<br />
southeast. It would be a wonderful resource that provides an experience that just can't be found anywhere<br />
else in the region. (Ltr# 160, Cmt# 2)<br />
Subconcern # B C<br />
#132- The length of the Chattooga River which is suitable to paddling and largely undeveloped is unique in<br />
this part of the Southeast. Opening the entire Chattooga to paddling would provide a river that could be<br />
completed over several days while camping. This is an appealing idea to those boaters, who, like myself,<br />
enjoy a wide range of outdoor activities which include hiking, fishing, and camping in addition to boating.<br />
(Ltr# 193, Cmt# 125)<br />
Subconcern # C<br />
Paddlers should be able to paddle the entire river as a multi-day trip if desired. (Ltr# 36, Cmt# 4)<br />
Subconcern # C<br />
Multiday trips should be allowed, even if only by permit. (Ltr# 56, Cmt# 2)<br />
Subconcern # D<br />
Allowing boating as desired outcome. The season for boating should be extended by 2 months. All sections<br />
should be open for floating at the same time. (Ltr# 52, Cmt# 1)<br />
Subconcern # E<br />
My “vote” is to ban all boat traffic, commercial or otherwise, from the river. From my standpoint, it is<br />
disgusting to see a plastic object like a kayak violating the natural beauty of this rare stream. So, I am<br />
212