Lynne Wong's PhD thesis

Lynne Wong's PhD thesis Lynne Wong's PhD thesis

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
29.12.2013 Views

⎛ F + G ⎞ TP = 33.9 − 13.4log10 ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ Ash ⎠ Target purity of molasses is that level of purity below which no more sucrose can be recovered from molasses. This target purity depends on a number of factors, most importantly, the viscosity and the crystal content of the massecuite, the saturation temperature at crystallization and the nature of the non-sucrose fraction in the final molasses, namely, the reducing sugars, notably fructose and glucose, as well as the inorganic ash such as potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium. Normally the TP of molasses is predicted from molasses data; however, in this experiment, mixed juice data were used to calculate mixed juice-based TP by using the above equation, from which molasses-based TP can be deduced since Lionnet and Koster (1986) have shown that molasses-based TP is two units higher than the mixed juice-based TP. In Mauritius, average monthly molasses from 17 sugar factories analysed by the Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute (MSIRI) over the years 1996-1999 (unpublished data) show that the average target purity difference (TPD), the difference between the molasses true purity (the percentage of sucrose in the dry solids) and its target purity, is on the rise (Table 2.1). As 1999 was an abnormal year when severe drought conditions prevailed, the 1998 average of 2.4 units was added to the estimated molasses-based TP to predict the expected true purity of Mauritian molasses. According to the 1998 data, Clerget purity is 0.1 unit higher than the true purity (not shown), therefore a further 0.1 unit was added. Hence, a constant totalling 4.5 units (2 + 2.4 + 0.1) was added to the mixed juice-based TP to predict Clerget purity of molasses. Table 2.1. Mauritian average of molasses target purity difference (TPD) compiled from MSIRI unpublished data. July August September October Mean 1999 3.6 3.4 2.5 1.7 2.8 1998 3.4 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.4 1997 2.6 2.3 1.3 1.9 2.0 1996 - 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 29

Since the extrapolated purity of molasses (M) and the purities of mixed juice (J) and sugar (S) were known, the SJM formula of Deerr (1921) could be used to predict the portion of the sucrose in the original material that goes to the sugar produced, after deduction of sucrose losses in filter cake and undetermined losses. The latter is the unaccounted sucrose loss when sucrose is extracted from cane after taking into account the sucrose losses in bagasse, in filter cake and in molasses. The SJM formula states that given a juice (or initial material, e.g. syrup or massecuite) of J purity and producing a sugar of S purity with a molasses of M purity, the percentage of the total sucrose (or pol) in the original material to go into the sugar will be 100S(J-M)/[J(S-M)]. The formula predicts the portion of the sucrose (or pol) in the original material that goes to the sugar produced, and the remainder goes to the molasses. No losses of any kind are taken into account in this formula. In this experiment, sucrose losses in filter cake and undetermined losses were unknown, and they were assumed to be 0.08 and 0.13% cane, respectively. These were the 1998 island average (Anon., 1999). When these values are compared to the 2004 values (Anon., 2005a) of 0.08 and 0.08% cane, respectively, it can be seen that they have remained more or less constant. The experiment also enabled the estimation of mill extraction (or more appropriately, press extraction, in the context in which the experiment was carried out); sucrose losses in bagasse and in molasses, boiling house recovery and overall recovery. Mill extraction is defined as the percent mass of pol originally present in the cane that has been extracted into the mixed juice. Boiling house recovery is the percentage of the pol in mixed juice that passes into the sugar produced. The product of mill extraction and boiling house recovery is known as overall recovery. 2.1.1 Materials For each trial of EM addition to clean cane, about 2 kg each of dry leaves, green leaves and cane tops, and about 20 kg of cane stalks were obtained from a neighbouring sugar factory. The cane stalks were cleaned of dry leaves, green leaves and cane tops. 1.3.1 Mercuric iodide juice preservative This is prepared by dissolving 500 g of red mercuric iodide in a saturated aqueous solution of potassium iodide and made up to a total volume of 1 L. The potassium iodide solution 30

⎛ F + G ⎞<br />

TP = 33.9 − 13.4log10<br />

⎜ ⎟<br />

⎝ Ash ⎠<br />

Target purity of molasses is that level of purity below which no more sucrose can be<br />

recovered from molasses. This target purity depends on a number of factors, most<br />

importantly, the viscosity and the crystal content of the massecuite, the saturation<br />

temperature at crystallization and the nature of the non-sucrose fraction in the final<br />

molasses, namely, the reducing sugars, notably fructose and glucose, as well as the<br />

inorganic ash such as potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium.<br />

Normally the TP of molasses is predicted from molasses data; however, in this experiment,<br />

mixed juice data were used to calculate mixed juice-based TP by using the above equation,<br />

from which molasses-based TP can be deduced since Lionnet and Koster (1986) have<br />

shown that molasses-based TP is two units higher than the mixed juice-based TP.<br />

In Mauritius, average monthly molasses from 17 sugar factories analysed by the Mauritius<br />

Sugar Industry Research Institute (MSIRI) over the years 1996-1999 (unpublished data)<br />

show that the average target purity difference (TPD), the difference between the molasses<br />

true purity (the percentage of sucrose in the dry solids) and its target purity, is on the rise<br />

(Table 2.1). As 1999 was an abnormal year when severe drought conditions prevailed, the<br />

1998 average of 2.4 units was added to the estimated molasses-based TP to predict the<br />

expected true purity of Mauritian molasses. According to the 1998 data, Clerget purity is<br />

0.1 unit higher than the true purity (not shown), therefore a further 0.1 unit was added.<br />

Hence, a constant totalling 4.5 units (2 + 2.4 + 0.1) was added to the mixed juice-based TP<br />

to predict Clerget purity of molasses.<br />

Table 2.1. Mauritian average of molasses target purity difference (TPD)<br />

compiled from MSIRI unpublished data.<br />

July August September October Mean<br />

1999 3.6 3.4 2.5 1.7 2.8<br />

1998 3.4 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.4<br />

1997 2.6 2.3 1.3 1.9 2.0<br />

1996 - 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!