Lynne Wong's PhD thesis
Lynne Wong's PhD thesis Lynne Wong's PhD thesis
value extracted from Tables 4.17 – 4.21 and corrected for residual moisture content. The H 1 values were extracted from Table 6.3. The results are shown in Table 6.6. Table 6.6. Comparison of the calculated bound water (primary, secondary and tertiary) with the Brix-free water values of the nine cane components of R 570 of two ages. Sample 52 weeks 36 weeks Bound water at moisture content/% Brix-free water/% Bound water at moisture content/% Brix-free water/% Primary Secondary Tertiary Primary Secondary Tertiary Stalk fibre 8 10 22 12.37 6 9 20 14.37 Stalk pith 10 11 20 25.05 - 14 22 22.48 Rind fibre 9 10 21 12.02 7 10 21 13.65 Rind fines 8 10 22 11.47 7 13 30 15.58 Top fibre 10 13 23 16.76 12 14 25 15.82 Dry leaf fibre 10 13 20 16.13 13 14 25 15.70 Dry leaf fines 14 15 26 18.17 8 10 25 17.64 Green leaf fibre - 15 21 13.77 8 10 25 13.63 Green leaf fines 9 10 25 14.79 7 9 20 16.20 It can be seen from Table 6.6 that the Brix-free water values of sugar cane component parts correspond most closely to the secondary bound water, except those of stalk pith with inherent high surface area, which indicate the similarity to the tertiary bound water, or the free water point, reported by some research workers (Kaleemullah and Kailappan, 2007; Arslan and Toğrul, 2005). Kaleemullah and Kailappan (2007) found the primary, secondary and tertiary bound waters of red chillies end at moisture contents of 1.5, 14 and 53.6% db respectively. 261
Binding energy/kJ (kg mol) -1 2 0 0 15 0 10 0 5 0 0 - 5 0 Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 9 5 0 15 0 7 5 0 5 5 0 3 5 0 5 0 15 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 - 5 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 - 5 0 Binding energy/kJ (kg mol) -1 15 0 10 0 5 0 0 - 5 0 Rind fines Top fibre Dry leaf fibre 2 5 0 15 0 5 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 - 5 0 2 5 0 15 0 5 0 - 5 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 Binding energy/kJ (kg mol) -1 2 5 0 15 0 5 0 - 5 0 Dry leaf fines Green leaf fibre Green leaf fines 10 0 5 0 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 - 5 0 2 0 0 15 0 10 0 5 0 0 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 - 5 0 EMC /% db Figure 6.11. Average energy of water binding by sugar cane component parts of cane variety R 570 aged 52 weeks. 262
- Page 263 and 264: 5.6.4.4 Fitting of sorption models
- Page 265 and 266: Table 5.19. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 267 and 268: Table 5.21. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 269 and 270: Table 5.23. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 271 and 272: Table 5.25. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 273 and 274: Table 5.27. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 275 and 276: Modified GAB Kuhn Iglesias - Chirif
- Page 277 and 278: Table 5.28. Classification of resid
- Page 279 and 280: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 4
- Page 281 and 282: 5.6.4.5 Calculated EMC values of re
- Page 283 and 284: Table 5.30. Calculated equilibrium
- Page 285 and 286: m/m of 96% Table 5.32. Calculated e
- Page 287 and 288: Table 5.33. Parameters of the Hailw
- Page 289 and 290: CHAPTER 6. PROPERTIES OF THE SORBED
- Page 291 and 292: where m is the equilibrium moisture
- Page 293 and 294: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 8
- Page 295 and 296: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 4
- Page 297 and 298: 6.2 THE NUMBER OF ADSORBED MONOLAYE
- Page 299 and 300: 6.3 TOTAL SOLID SURFACE AREA AVAILA
- Page 301 and 302: Thus, for each cane component of ea
- Page 303 and 304: abscissa. For each moisture level (
- Page 305 and 306: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 1
- Page 307 and 308: A similar procedure was followed to
- Page 309 and 310: 10 0 Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fi
- Page 311 and 312: Moreover, if T β > T hm the proces
- Page 313: Table 6.5. Characteristic parameter
- Page 317 and 318: 6.8 CALCULATION OF BOUND WATER AND
- Page 319 and 320: The values of K 1 , K 2 and W were
- Page 321 and 322: Table 6.7. Separation of the total
- Page 323 and 324: Table 6.7. (Contd.) Sample 30 o C 4
- Page 325 and 326: 3 0 S talk fibre 4 0 Stalk pith 3 0
- Page 327 and 328: 3 0 Reconstituted cane at 30 o C 3
- Page 329 and 330: when water is added to dry wood, wh
- Page 331 and 332: It is evident that in some cases ma
- Page 333 and 334: The number of adsorbed monolayers,
- Page 335 and 336: Data in Tables 2.9 and 2.11 show th
- Page 337 and 338: particular fibre is systematically
- Page 339 and 340: Anon. (1985b). Laboratory manual fo
- Page 341 and 342: Blanchi R.H. and A.G. Keller (1952)
- Page 343 and 344: Day D.L. and G.L. Nelson (1965). De
- Page 345 and 346: Heyrovsky J. (1970). Determination
- Page 347 and 348: Kuhn I.J. (1964). A new theoretical
- Page 349 and 350: Madamba P.S., R.H. Driscoll and K.A
- Page 351 and 352: Prinsen Geerligs, H.C. (1897). Stud
- Page 353 and 354: Sing K.S.W., D.H. Everett, R.A.W. H
- Page 355 and 356: Van der Pol C., C.M. Young and K. D
value extracted from Tables 4.17 – 4.21 and corrected for residual moisture content. The<br />
H 1 values were extracted from Table 6.3. The results are shown in Table 6.6.<br />
Table 6.6. Comparison of the calculated bound water (primary, secondary and tertiary)<br />
with the Brix-free water values of the nine cane components of R 570 of two ages.<br />
Sample 52 weeks 36 weeks<br />
Bound water at moisture content/% Brix-free water/% Bound water at moisture content/% Brix-free water/%<br />
Primary Secondary Tertiary Primary Secondary Tertiary<br />
Stalk fibre 8 10 22 12.37 6 9 20 14.37<br />
Stalk pith 10 11 20 25.05 - 14 22 22.48<br />
Rind fibre 9 10 21 12.02 7 10 21 13.65<br />
Rind fines 8 10 22 11.47 7 13 30 15.58<br />
Top fibre 10 13 23 16.76 12 14 25 15.82<br />
Dry leaf fibre 10 13 20 16.13 13 14 25 15.70<br />
Dry leaf fines 14 15 26 18.17 8 10 25 17.64<br />
Green leaf fibre - 15 21 13.77 8 10 25 13.63<br />
Green leaf fines 9 10 25 14.79 7 9 20 16.20<br />
It can be seen from Table 6.6 that the Brix-free water values of sugar cane component parts<br />
correspond most closely to the secondary bound water, except those of stalk pith with<br />
inherent high surface area, which indicate the similarity to the tertiary bound water, or the<br />
free water point, reported by some research workers (Kaleemullah and Kailappan, 2007;<br />
Arslan and Toğrul, 2005). Kaleemullah and Kailappan (2007) found the primary,<br />
secondary and tertiary bound waters of red chillies end at moisture contents of 1.5, 14 and<br />
53.6% db respectively.<br />
261