Lynne Wong's PhD thesis
Lynne Wong's PhD thesis Lynne Wong's PhD thesis
The isotherm parameters of the Hailwood-Horrobin and GAB models were estimated by the non-linear regression procedure of SigmaPlot (SPSS Inc.) for the calculated EMC data of reconstituted R 570 cane stalk, dry leaf and green leaf aged 52 weeks (Tables 5.29 and 5.31) and aged 36 weeks (Tables 5.30 and 5.32). The values of the isotherm parameters, together with the calculated regression criteria: coefficient of determination R 2 , the mean deviation modulus P and the standard error of the estimate E s , for each model and for the reconstituted cane stalk, dry leaf and green leaf aged 52 and 36 weeks are shown in Table 5.33. All R 2 values approach one and the P values are less than 10, except for reconstituted green leaf aged 36 weeks as predicted by the Hailwood-Horrobin model, and the E s values are also low. The good-fit of the Hailwood-Horrobin and GAB models to the calculated EMC values of reconstituted cane and leaves is confirmed by inspection of the isotherm plots (Fig 5.15). 5.7 CONCLUSIONS The EMC of cane components of variety R 570 aged 52 and 36 weeks were determined at 30, 45, 55 and 60 °C for water activities ranging from 0.17 to 0.98. The resulting sorption isotherms exhibit a type II sigmoid pattern. Three models were found to provide a good-fit to the experimental data: the modified GAB, Hailwood-Horrobin and GAB models in this order. However, the modified GAB model did not extend to water activity values greater than 0.95, whereas the other two models covered the whole range of water activities studied. The EMC of sugar cane stalk of variety R 570 aged 36 and 52 weeks was estimated from the dry mass fractions of cane stalk fibre, stalk pith, rind fibre and rind fines, and the respective individual observed EMC values. Similarly, the EMC of dry leaf and green leaf was calculated from the dry mass fractions of fibre and fines and their constituent experimental EMC. The GAB model was found to fit the calculated EMC values of the reconstituted cane stalk, dry leaf and green leaf of R 570 aged 36 and 52 weeks well; similarly for the Hailwood-Horrobin model except for green leaf aged 36 weeks. The models of the sorption characteristics of the sugar cane component parts could now be used to determine a number of thermodynamic parameters that enable the bound water to be characterised. This work is described in Chapter 6. 233
Table 5.33. Parameters of the Hailwood Horrobin and GAB sorption isotherm models, the coefficient of determination R 2 , mean relative deviation modulus P, and the standard error of the estimate E s for reconstituted R 570 of two ages and at various temperatures. Reconstituted Model Parameter 52 weeks 36 weeks R 570 30 o C 45 o C 55 o C 60 o C 30 o C 45 o C 55 o C 60 o C Cane stalk Hailwood Horrobin b 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 c 0.18 0.19 0.24 0.31 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.24 d -0.15 -0.18 -0.24 -0.29 -0.17 -0.19 -0.25 -0.22 R 2 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 P 4.397 11.79 3.916 6.224 6.340 4.846 4.616 6.604 E s 1.288 2.228 0.7431 1.243 1.060 0.9785 1.167 0.8600 GAB m o 5.05 4.58 3.55 3.07 4.67 3.75 3.39 3.66 b 25.90 16.67 13.79 40.23 34.06 -300000000 24.38 14.98 c 0.81 0.85 0.90 0.92 0.82 0.88 0.89 0.87 R 2 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 P 4.530 4.349 3.934 6.217 5.988 9.930 4.656 6.407 E s 1.288 0.694 0.737 1.244 1.032 1.170 0.9805 0.8417 Dry leaf Hailwood Horrobin b 0.015 0.008 0.012 -0.015 0.005 0.003 0.009 -0.057 c 0.133 0.230 0.246 0.392 0.205 0.242 0.218 0.628 d -0.111 -0.206 -0.227 -0.356 -0.176 -0.215 -0.194 -0.554 R 2 0.977 0.992 0.973 0.961 0.988 0.978 0.984 0.808 P 6.584 3.922 8.018 11.12 4.638 12.60 8.067 28.32 E s 1.567 1.038 2.082 3.348 1.216 1.875 1.479 8.345 GAB m o 6.424 3.933 3.581 2.846 4.669 4.055 4.094 2.166 b 13.807 -30000000 -10000000 40000000 48.238 96.221 -50000000 8362848 c 0.770 0.874 0.891 0.938 0.839 0.879 0.867 0.960 R 2 0.977 0.992 0.972 0.960 0.988 0.978 0.983 0.804 P 6.707 5.114 5.114 9.505 4.412 12.61 9.801 27.90 E s 1.550 1.073 1.073 3.325 1.165 1.874 1.508 8.425 Green leaf Hailwood Horrobin b 0.018 0.010 0.007 -0.002 0.219 0.243 0.251 0.597 c 0.158 0.227 0.279 0.312 0.004 0.009 0.011 -0.052 d -0.141 -0.208 -0.261 -0.285 -0.188 -0.222 -0.232 -0.532 R 2 0.978 0.996 0.994 0.973 0.986 0.997 0.991 0.870 P 5.844 4.361 5.758 6.633 44.17 45.78 44.41 63.69 E s 1.622 0.8335 1.213 2.471 5.869 6.288 5.976 14.93 GAB m o 4.664 4.095 3.429 3.257 4.419 3.878 3.698 2.218 b -200000000 28.513 45.999 4013274 66.576 33.752 27.781 10000000 c 0.839 0.881 0.915 0.918 0.844 0.888 0.891 0.969 R 2 0.973 0.996 0.994 0.973 0.986 0.997 0.991 2.218 P 11.18 4.443 5.768 5.768 2.882 6.269 5.576 25.22 E s 1.789 0.8266 1.217 1.217 1.263 0.7331 1.217 8.099 Note: m o , b, c and d are constants. 234
- Page 235 and 236: Bruijn (1963) studied the mass incr
- Page 237 and 238: After measuring the EMC of dry corn
- Page 239 and 240: approached, that is, either by adso
- Page 241 and 242: Table 5.4. Water activity (a w ) of
- Page 243 and 244: 5.6.3 Procedure to determine equili
- Page 245 and 246: 5.6.4 Results and discussion An exa
- Page 247 and 248: Table 5.8. Equilibrium moisture con
- Page 249 and 250: Table 5.10. Equilibrium moisture co
- Page 251 and 252: Table 5.12. Equilibrium moisture co
- Page 253 and 254: 30 o C 45 o C 55 o C 60 o C Water w
- Page 255 and 256: m/m of 96% activity, a w (g/100g dr
- Page 257 and 258: vaporisation generally decreases fr
- Page 259 and 260: 30 o C isotherm 45 o C isotherm 55
- Page 261 and 262: 4 0 Stalk fibre 5 0 Stalk pith 5 0
- Page 263 and 264: 5.6.4.4 Fitting of sorption models
- Page 265 and 266: Table 5.19. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 267 and 268: Table 5.21. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 269 and 270: Table 5.23. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 271 and 272: Table 5.25. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 273 and 274: Table 5.27. Parameters of the sorpt
- Page 275 and 276: Modified GAB Kuhn Iglesias - Chirif
- Page 277 and 278: Table 5.28. Classification of resid
- Page 279 and 280: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 4
- Page 281 and 282: 5.6.4.5 Calculated EMC values of re
- Page 283 and 284: Table 5.30. Calculated equilibrium
- Page 285: m/m of 96% Table 5.32. Calculated e
- Page 289 and 290: CHAPTER 6. PROPERTIES OF THE SORBED
- Page 291 and 292: where m is the equilibrium moisture
- Page 293 and 294: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 8
- Page 295 and 296: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 4
- Page 297 and 298: 6.2 THE NUMBER OF ADSORBED MONOLAYE
- Page 299 and 300: 6.3 TOTAL SOLID SURFACE AREA AVAILA
- Page 301 and 302: Thus, for each cane component of ea
- Page 303 and 304: abscissa. For each moisture level (
- Page 305 and 306: Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fibre 1
- Page 307 and 308: A similar procedure was followed to
- Page 309 and 310: 10 0 Stalk fibre Stalk pith Rind fi
- Page 311 and 312: Moreover, if T β > T hm the proces
- Page 313 and 314: Table 6.5. Characteristic parameter
- Page 315 and 316: Binding energy/kJ (kg mol) -1 2 0 0
- Page 317 and 318: 6.8 CALCULATION OF BOUND WATER AND
- Page 319 and 320: The values of K 1 , K 2 and W were
- Page 321 and 322: Table 6.7. Separation of the total
- Page 323 and 324: Table 6.7. (Contd.) Sample 30 o C 4
- Page 325 and 326: 3 0 S talk fibre 4 0 Stalk pith 3 0
- Page 327 and 328: 3 0 Reconstituted cane at 30 o C 3
- Page 329 and 330: when water is added to dry wood, wh
- Page 331 and 332: It is evident that in some cases ma
- Page 333 and 334: The number of adsorbed monolayers,
- Page 335 and 336: Data in Tables 2.9 and 2.11 show th
Table 5.33. Parameters of the Hailwood Horrobin and GAB sorption isotherm models, the coefficient of determination R 2 ,<br />
mean relative deviation modulus P, and the standard error of the estimate E s for<br />
reconstituted R 570 of two ages and at various temperatures.<br />
Reconstituted Model Parameter 52 weeks 36 weeks<br />
R 570 30 o C 45 o C 55 o C 60 o C 30 o C 45 o C 55 o C 60 o C<br />
Cane stalk Hailwood Horrobin b 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02<br />
c 0.18 0.19 0.24 0.31 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.24<br />
d -0.15 -0.18 -0.24 -0.29 -0.17 -0.19 -0.25 -0.22<br />
R 2 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99<br />
P 4.397 11.79 3.916 6.224 6.340 4.846 4.616 6.604<br />
E s 1.288 2.228 0.7431 1.243 1.060 0.9785 1.167 0.8600<br />
GAB m o 5.05 4.58 3.55 3.07 4.67 3.75 3.39 3.66<br />
b 25.90 16.67 13.79 40.23 34.06 -300000000 24.38 14.98<br />
c 0.81 0.85 0.90 0.92 0.82 0.88 0.89 0.87<br />
R 2 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99<br />
P 4.530 4.349 3.934 6.217 5.988 9.930 4.656 6.407<br />
E s 1.288 0.694 0.737 1.244 1.032 1.170 0.9805 0.8417<br />
Dry leaf Hailwood Horrobin b 0.015 0.008 0.012 -0.015 0.005 0.003 0.009 -0.057<br />
c 0.133 0.230 0.246 0.392 0.205 0.242 0.218 0.628<br />
d -0.111 -0.206 -0.227 -0.356 -0.176 -0.215 -0.194 -0.554<br />
R 2 0.977 0.992 0.973 0.961 0.988 0.978 0.984 0.808<br />
P 6.584 3.922 8.018 11.12 4.638 12.60 8.067 28.32<br />
E s 1.567 1.038 2.082 3.348 1.216 1.875 1.479 8.345<br />
GAB m o 6.424 3.933 3.581 2.846 4.669 4.055 4.094 2.166<br />
b 13.807 -30000000 -10000000 40000000 48.238 96.221 -50000000 8362848<br />
c 0.770 0.874 0.891 0.938 0.839 0.879 0.867 0.960<br />
R 2 0.977 0.992 0.972 0.960 0.988 0.978 0.983 0.804<br />
P 6.707 5.114 5.114 9.505 4.412 12.61 9.801 27.90<br />
E s 1.550 1.073 1.073 3.325 1.165 1.874 1.508 8.425<br />
Green leaf Hailwood Horrobin b 0.018 0.010 0.007 -0.002 0.219 0.243 0.251 0.597<br />
c 0.158 0.227 0.279 0.312 0.004 0.009 0.011 -0.052<br />
d -0.141 -0.208 -0.261 -0.285 -0.188 -0.222 -0.232 -0.532<br />
R 2 0.978 0.996 0.994 0.973 0.986 0.997 0.991 0.870<br />
P 5.844 4.361 5.758 6.633 44.17 45.78 44.41 63.69<br />
E s 1.622 0.8335 1.213 2.471 5.869 6.288 5.976 14.93<br />
GAB m o 4.664 4.095 3.429 3.257 4.419 3.878 3.698 2.218<br />
b -200000000 28.513 45.999 4013274 66.576 33.752 27.781 10000000<br />
c 0.839 0.881 0.915 0.918 0.844 0.888 0.891 0.969<br />
R 2 0.973 0.996 0.994 0.973 0.986 0.997 0.991 2.218<br />
P 11.18 4.443 5.768 5.768 2.882 6.269 5.576 25.22<br />
E s 1.789 0.8266 1.217 1.217 1.263 0.7331 1.217 8.099<br />
Note: m o , b, c and d are constants.<br />
234