29.12.2013 Views

Lynne Wong's PhD thesis

Lynne Wong's PhD thesis

Lynne Wong's PhD thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This is attributable to possible residual sucrose in the fibre sample, despite repeated<br />

washing and pressing during the fibre extraction process, resulting in an over-estimation of<br />

the Brix increase in the sucrose contacting solution, and hence an over-estimation of the<br />

Brix-free water content.<br />

Reports exist on the use of detergent to clean plant tissue prior to certain analyses, e.g. Van<br />

Soest (1963) experimented with detergents to dissolve forage nitrogen in the preparation of<br />

fibrous portions of plant tissue of low nitrogen content for analysis such as lignin, and<br />

found cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide in strongly acid solution or sodium lauryl sulfate<br />

in slightly alkaline solutions most effective. However, one must ensure that any residual<br />

reagent does not affect the subsequent Brix-free water determination. It would be much<br />

simpler to effect a blank determination in distilled water, and subtract the Brix value of the<br />

sample blank from that of the test solution. Since it would be difficult to adjust to have the<br />

same mass of distilled water in the blank as that of the contact solution in the test solution,<br />

let alone to have the same mass of fibre sample in the blank and test solution, bearing in<br />

mind the hygroscopic nature of cellulose fibre; a corrected blank is needed to compensate<br />

for the differences in masses. The advantage of the corrected blank is that if one sample is<br />

used several times in the same experiment for different test purposes, only one blank will<br />

be required.<br />

Thus, if w 1 and w 3 are the mass of sample in the blank and test solution respectively, and<br />

w 2 is the mass of distilled water in the blank and w 4 , the mass of the contacting solution in<br />

the test solution; p 1 and p 2 are the Brix of the sample blank before and after equilibrium,<br />

and p 3 and p 4 are the Brix of the test solution before and after equilibrium, the corrected<br />

blank, b, is given by b = p 2 w 2 w 3 /(w 1 w 4 ) and the net Brix increase by p = p 4 – b.<br />

Hence the Brix-free water in the sample is given by BFW = [100 w 4 (1 – p 3 p -1 )]/w 3 .<br />

Results obtained from almost sucrose-free fibre samples (Table 4.3) confirmed that the<br />

samples still had high residual sucrose content as evidenced by the high Brix p 2 after<br />

equilibration with distilled water, and the Brix-free water results are now 30-40% lower<br />

than those obtained had the sample blank not been incorporated in the method. Most other<br />

workers performed their studies on bagasse which probably has a low residual sucrose.<br />

122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!