Lynne Wong's PhD thesis
Lynne Wong's PhD thesis Lynne Wong's PhD thesis
Snow (1974) tested eight cane varieties of 11-month maturity, where the fibre/pith ratio varied from 0.66 to 1.52 and fibre % cane (presumably total fibre % cane) ranged from 9.0 to 12.2. Moodley (1991) tested four different varieties of cane aged 19 months and found that although the fibre/pith ratio did vary from 2.00 to 2.86, there was not much difference in pith % cane, but the hard fibre % cane did vary over a wide range from 8.85 to 12.86. In this study, with the four cane varieties aged 52 weeks, fibre/pith ratio in cane ranged from 1.06 to 1.21, in agreement with values found by Snow (1974). Hard fibre % cane varied from 3.68 to 4.46, pith % cane from 3.18 to 4.03, and fibre % cane from 6.98 to 8.27. As mentioned earlier, the fibre % cane values appear to be low, and so do those of hard fibre % cane. 3.5.3.3 Effect of extraneous matter on fibre/pith ratio in cane Moodley (1991) found that, by adding 12% by mass of cane tops to clean cane, hard fibre % cane is greatly increased from 8.78 to 10.99, and the pith % cane changes from 4.03 to 3.16 giving a fibre/pith ratio of 3.45, whereas with the addition of 12% by mass of dry leaves, hard fibre % cane was greatly increased to 14.06 and the pith % cane to 4.11 giving a fibre/pith ratio of 3.45 also. He also found that drought conditions affect fibre/pith ratio, normally it is 60:40, whereas during drought it changes to 40:60. In this study, by using data from Tables 3.8 – 3.10, the mass of stalk plus rind can be considered as clean cane, the effect of the presence of dry leaf in gross cane (clean cane + dry leaf) on hard fibre % cane, pith % cane, total fibre % cane and fibre/pith ratio in cane was evaluated and shown in Tables 3.14 – 3.16 for the four cane varieties at three ages. The first fraction > 1.18 mm collected after dry sieving was considered to be the hard fibre and the second fraction < 1.18 mm, the fines or pith. Similarly, the effect of green leaf and tops on the above parameters was also assessed. It can be seen that all the extraneous matter studied increases the fibre/pith ratio in cane (except dry leaf when added to 44 weeks old cane), hard fibre % cane, pith % cane and total fibre in cane. 3.5.3.4 Effect of extraneous matter on fibre % cane From Tables 3.14 – 3.16, it is evident that the addition of dry leaf and green leaf, but not cane tops, to clean cane increases fibre % cane. These increases in fibre % cane due to the presence of dry leaf and green leaf are calculated and shown in Table 3.17 for the four cane varieties of three ages. These calculated increases compare favourably with the prediction 105
from Figure 2.9 that the change in fibre % cane is 0.572, 0.132 and –0.001 due to one unit of dry leaf, green leaf and cane tops respectively; except in the case of dry leaf addition to 44 weeks old cane. 3.5.3.5 Fibre % cane results by direct cane analysis It has been pointed out that the fibre % cane calculated from the mass of the extracted fibres appear to be on the low side. This is confirmed by the fibre % cane results obtained by direct cane analysis (Anon., 1991) performed on parallel samples and shown in Table 3.18. For the samples aged 52 weeks, the calculated fibre % cane values are 2 – 4 units lower than the analytical results, whereas for the samples aged 44 and 36 weeks, only about one unit (except the M 1557/60 aged 44 weeks) difference was found. 3.5.4 Characterisation of sugar cane component parts The components separated from the sugar cane plant were characterised by measuring their gross calorific values and by investigating their structure and morphology by means of infra-red spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. 3.5.4.1 Gross calorific value Snow (1974) also mentioned that with a high pith content in cane, extensive problems would be encountered by the high residual moisture content of bagasse due to the fact that pith can easily pick up atmospheric moisture and absorb more water during cane processing than fibre, entailing additional expenses through increased consumption of auxiliary fuel oil to burn the bagasse. The results of the determination of the calorific value of the various cane components are shown in Table 3.19; it is evident that while extracted rind has the highest GCV of 19 443 kJ kg -1 , followed by stalk fibre (19 041 kJ kg -1 ) and dry leaf (18 268 kJ kg -1 ); stalk pith has the lowest GCV (17 512 kJ kg -1 ) of about 8% less than stalk fibre. The stalk fibres of R 579 and R 570 appear to have higher GCV than those of the other two cane varieties. 106
- Page 103 and 104: filter paper, rejecting the first f
- Page 105 and 106: Table 2.9. Effect of increased addi
- Page 107 and 108: Table 2.11. Effect of increased add
- Page 109 and 110: Table 2.13. Effect of increased add
- Page 111 and 112: various components such as stalk fi
- Page 113 and 114: in the presence of dry leaves, if c
- Page 115 and 116: Table 2.17. Moisture content in sug
- Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER 3. SEPARATION OF THE SUGAR
- Page 119 and 120: Table 3.1. It can be seen that the
- Page 121 and 122: Table 3.2. Fibrous physical composi
- Page 123 and 124: R 579 R 570 M 1557/70 M 1400/86 74
- Page 125 and 126: loosen the fibre. The woody core is
- Page 127 and 128: agitate the mixture in the pot, and
- Page 129 and 130: Figure 3.7. Custom-built fibre-pith
- Page 131 and 132: The extraction of fibres starting f
- Page 133 and 134: pre-treatment in a Jeffco cutter-gr
- Page 135 and 136: Figure 3.19. Stalk cake washed free
- Page 137 and 138: not have many dry leaves attached t
- Page 139 and 140: Table 3.5. Masses of cane samples a
- Page 141 and 142: Table 3.7. Masses of cane samples a
- Page 143 and 144: Table 3.9. Masses of cane component
- Page 145 and 146: 3 57.6 126.3 23.7 97.2 31.1 53.8 11
- Page 147 and 148: Table 3.12. Material loss (%) from
- Page 149 and 150: 3.5.3 Fibre/pith ratios in cane com
- Page 151 and 152: Table 3.15. Effect of extraneous ma
- Page 153: Snow (1974) investigated the season
- Page 157 and 158: Table 3.18. Fibre % cane results by
- Page 159 and 160: 110
- Page 161 and 162: (a). Dry leaf (b). Green leaf (c).
- Page 163 and 164: dry fibre, or a factor, is used in
- Page 165 and 166: Steuerwald (1912) applied sucrose s
- Page 167 and 168: solution/fibre ratio was lowered fr
- Page 169 and 170: leave some residual moisture on the
- Page 171 and 172: instead of 150 g of 10° Brix sucro
- Page 173 and 174: Table 4.2. Determination of Brix-fr
- Page 175 and 176: Table 4.3. Comparison of Brix-free
- Page 177 and 178: Table 4.4. Results of the determina
- Page 179 and 180: In order to test for homogeneity of
- Page 181 and 182: Table 4.7. Results of the repeat de
- Page 183 and 184: The experiment was repeated with th
- Page 185 and 186: e any residual moisture in the samp
- Page 187 and 188: By means of the same technique, Won
- Page 189 and 190: was still hot. Since the filter was
- Page 191 and 192: value determined could be corrected
- Page 193 and 194: Qin and White’s finding was confi
- Page 195 and 196: A sample size of 3.5 g with 75 g co
- Page 197 and 198: Figure 4.4. Fibre samples drying in
- Page 199 and 200: - One large fibre sample (rind) of
- Page 201 and 202: Table 4.18. Brix-free water values/
- Page 203 and 204: Table 4.20. Brix-free water values/
Snow (1974) tested eight cane varieties of 11-month maturity, where the fibre/pith ratio<br />
varied from 0.66 to 1.52 and fibre % cane (presumably total fibre % cane) ranged from 9.0<br />
to 12.2.<br />
Moodley (1991) tested four different varieties of cane aged 19 months and found that<br />
although the fibre/pith ratio did vary from 2.00 to 2.86, there was not much difference in<br />
pith % cane, but the hard fibre % cane did vary over a wide range from 8.85 to 12.86.<br />
In this study, with the four cane varieties aged 52 weeks, fibre/pith ratio in cane ranged<br />
from 1.06 to 1.21, in agreement with values found by Snow (1974). Hard fibre % cane<br />
varied from 3.68 to 4.46, pith % cane from 3.18 to 4.03, and fibre % cane from 6.98 to<br />
8.27. As mentioned earlier, the fibre % cane values appear to be low, and so do those of<br />
hard fibre % cane.<br />
3.5.3.3 Effect of extraneous matter on fibre/pith ratio in cane<br />
Moodley (1991) found that, by adding 12% by mass of cane tops to clean cane, hard fibre<br />
% cane is greatly increased from 8.78 to 10.99, and the pith % cane changes from 4.03 to<br />
3.16 giving a fibre/pith ratio of 3.45, whereas with the addition of 12% by mass of dry<br />
leaves, hard fibre % cane was greatly increased to 14.06 and the pith % cane to 4.11 giving<br />
a fibre/pith ratio of 3.45 also. He also found that drought conditions affect fibre/pith ratio,<br />
normally it is 60:40, whereas during drought it changes to 40:60.<br />
In this study, by using data from Tables 3.8 – 3.10, the mass of stalk plus rind can be<br />
considered as clean cane, the effect of the presence of dry leaf in gross cane (clean cane +<br />
dry leaf) on hard fibre % cane, pith % cane, total fibre % cane and fibre/pith ratio in cane<br />
was evaluated and shown in Tables 3.14 – 3.16 for the four cane varieties at three ages.<br />
The first fraction > 1.18 mm collected after dry sieving was considered to be the hard fibre<br />
and the second fraction < 1.18 mm, the fines or pith. Similarly, the effect of green leaf and<br />
tops on the above parameters was also assessed. It can be seen that all the extraneous<br />
matter studied increases the fibre/pith ratio in cane (except dry leaf when added to 44<br />
weeks old cane), hard fibre % cane, pith % cane and total fibre in cane.<br />
3.5.3.4 Effect of extraneous matter on fibre % cane<br />
From Tables 3.14 – 3.16, it is evident that the addition of dry leaf and green leaf, but not<br />
cane tops, to clean cane increases fibre % cane. These increases in fibre % cane due to the<br />
presence of dry leaf and green leaf are calculated and shown in Table 3.17 for the four cane<br />
varieties of three ages. These calculated increases compare favourably with the prediction<br />
105