Lynne Wong's PhD thesis

Lynne Wong's PhD thesis Lynne Wong's PhD thesis

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
29.12.2013 Views

ased on the manner in which the Brix-free water determination is performed on the sample (Mangion and Player, 1991). This is done by adding 150 mL of a 10° Brix sucrose solution to 8 g of dry sample (here the moist cake is assumed to contain 50% moisture and hence double this mass is used in the calculation), and measuring the increase of Brix in the resulting solution. The washing was repeated on the remainder of the sample until all was free from residual Brix. To separate pith from the fibre, the cakes from the Pinette Emidecau press were soaked in a bucket of water. A sieve assembly was mounted with a 2 mm, 1.18 mm and 38 μm sieve in order on top of each other. A handful of fibre and pith mixture was put onto the top sieve, and running tap water was used to wash the pith into the bottom sieve. Separation of pith from the fibre in the sample was thus effected. The separated fibre was hand pressed and placed in a metal tray for drying in an oven at 65 °C to constant mass. The separated pith was also dried in the same way. The dried fibre samples sometimes still contained some pith, and dry sieving by using a 1.18 mm sieve mounted on top of a receiver was used to ensure complete separation. 3.4.3.2 Rind, dry leaves and green leaves These samples were treated as for the cane stalk. Pre-treatment in a Jeffco cutter-grinder was necessary, the sample mass and the time of disintegration are indicated in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Preparatory treatment process for fibre extraction from sugar cane plant components. Sample Cutter-grinder Mass used in the Jeffco wet disintegrator/g Disintegration time/s Top Stalk Rind Dry leaves Green leaves - 400 500 300 100 300 60 30 75 60 30 3.4.3.3 Cane tops After the cane tops were detached from the stalks at the point where they naturally broke off the stalks, they were cut into 10 cm lengths and into thin strips lengthwise; in so doing, 83

pre-treatment in a Jeffco cutter-grinder was not necessary. The top sample was then treated as for the cane stalk; the sample mass and the time of disintegration required are indicated in Table 3.4. The three replicates (four stalks each) of the four varieties aged 44 weeks were treated in the same manner the following week, and those aged 36 weeks the week thereafter. Some relevant fibre extraction processes from the sugar cane plant are illustrated in Figs 3.9 – Fig 3.21. Figure 3.9. Removal of cane nodes. Figure 3.10. Removal of green leaves. Figure 3.11. Green leaf sample before and after cutter-grinding. Figure 3.12. Washing of green leaf sample after cutter-grinding and retting. 84

pre-treatment in a Jeffco cutter-grinder was not necessary. The top sample was then<br />

treated as for the cane stalk; the sample mass and the time of disintegration required are<br />

indicated in Table 3.4.<br />

The three replicates (four stalks each) of the four varieties aged 44 weeks were treated in<br />

the same manner the following week, and those aged 36 weeks the week thereafter.<br />

Some relevant fibre extraction processes from the sugar cane plant are illustrated in<br />

Figs 3.9 – Fig 3.21.<br />

Figure 3.9. Removal of cane nodes.<br />

Figure 3.10. Removal of green leaves.<br />

Figure 3.11. Green leaf sample before and after<br />

cutter-grinding.<br />

Figure 3.12. Washing of green leaf sample<br />

after cutter-grinding and retting.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!