SELF-REGULATION, EMOTION EXPRESSION & CLASSROOM ...
SELF-REGULATION, EMOTION EXPRESSION & CLASSROOM ...
SELF-REGULATION, EMOTION EXPRESSION & CLASSROOM ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of the model in this investigation. The decision to remove the aforementioned variables,<br />
led to increased reliability and factors loadings with the remaining manifest variables.<br />
The results of the outer model examination of the LVs hot and cool executive control,<br />
on-task involvement, competence motivation, attitude towards learning, and attention/<br />
persistence can be found in table 2.<br />
Inner model. Examining both the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and the<br />
correlations among LVs are the first steps in understanding the inner model. These<br />
results help determine discriminant and convergent validity. Discriminant validity<br />
indicates the extent to which an LV is significantly different from other LVs, which is<br />
determined by the AVE. According for Fornell and Larcker (1981), a score of .50 for the<br />
AVE demonstrates an acceptable level. The current model meets this criterion (see table<br />
2). Additionally, the comparison of square root of AVE (see diagonal values in table 3)<br />
compared with the correlations among the reflective constructs should indicate the all<br />
constructs are more strongly correlated with their own measures than with any other<br />
construct (Esposito Vinzi, et al., 2010) which suggests both discriminant and convergent<br />
validity.<br />
The LV correlations found in table 3 also serve as initial indicators of the<br />
hypothetical relations between LVs. The results in table 3 suggest that hot executive<br />
control only demonstrates a significant relation to cool executive control and a child’s<br />
on-task involvement, and not directly related to any of the classroom learning<br />
49