Chapter 2 Review of Forces and Moments - Brown University
Chapter 2 Review of Forces and Moments - Brown University
Chapter 2 Review of Forces and Moments - Brown University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(1) All surfaces are rough;<br />
(2) All surfaces are covered with a thin film <strong>of</strong> oxide, an adsorbed layer <strong>of</strong> water, or an<br />
organic film.<br />
Surface roughness can be controlled to some extent – a cast<br />
surface is usually very rough; if the surface is machined the<br />
roughness is somewhat less; roughness can be reduced further<br />
by grinding, lapping or polishing the surfaces. But you can’t get<br />
rid <strong>of</strong> it altogether. Many surfaces can be thought <strong>of</strong> as having a<br />
fractal geometry. This means that the roughness is statistically<br />
self-similar with length scale – as you zoom in on the surface, it<br />
always looks (statistically) the same (more precisely the<br />
surfaces are self-affine. When you zoom in, it looks like the<br />
surface got stretched vertically – surfaces are rougher at short<br />
wavelengths than at long ones).<br />
Of course no surface can be truly fractal: roughness can’t be<br />
smaller than the size <strong>of</strong> an atom <strong>and</strong> can’t be larger than the<br />
component; but most surfaces look fractal over quite a large range <strong>of</strong> lengths. Various statistical<br />
measures are used to quantify surface roughness, but a discussion <strong>of</strong> these parameters is beyond the scope<br />
<strong>of</strong> this course.<br />
Now, visualize what the contact between two rough surfaces looks like. The surfaces will only touch at<br />
high spots (these are known in the trade as `asperities’) on the two surfaces. Experiments suggest that<br />
there are huge numbers <strong>of</strong> these contacts (nobody has really been able to determine with certainty how<br />
many there actually are). The asperity tips are squashed flat where they contact, so that there is a finite<br />
total area <strong>of</strong> contact between the two surfaces. However, the true contact area (at asperity tips) is much<br />
smaller than the nominal contact area.<br />
N<br />
Nominal contact area A nom<br />
True contact<br />
area A true<br />
The true contact area can be estimated by measuring the surface roughness, <strong>and</strong> then calculating how the<br />
surfaces deform when brought into contact. At present there is some uncertainty as to how this should be<br />
done – this is arguably the most important unsolved problem in the field. The best estimates we have<br />
today all agree that:<br />
The true area <strong>of</strong> contact between two rough surfaces is proportional to the normal force pressing them<br />
together.<br />
Atrue<br />
= CN