28.12.2013 Views

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>MILIOLIDAE</strong> FROM MIOCENE OF POLAND 11<br />

the group Spiroloculininae to the rank of subfamily, in which, in addition<br />

to the above-mentioned genera, he placed also Tubinellina gen.n., Flintina<br />

Cushman, Ptychomiliola Eimer et Fickert, Nubeculina Cushman and<br />

Flintia Schubert, and separated two new genera on the basis of their<br />

having a plate-like tooth in the aperture; these are Miliolinella and<br />

Biloculinella. In this concection the genus Miliolina was split into three<br />

genera: Miliolina Williamson proper, with a simple tooth, Miliolinella<br />

gen.n., with a plate-like tooth, and Miliola Lamarck, with a trematophore<br />

aperture, and the genus Biloculina into two genera: Biloculina proper (now<br />

Pyrgo), with a bifid tooth, and Biloculinella gen.n., with a plate-like tooth.<br />

Wiesner (1918) was, therefore, one of the first writers who acknowledged<br />

the taxonomic value of such characters, hardly taken into consideration<br />

up to then, as the shape of the aperture, the mode of its narrowing,<br />

the type of the apertural tooth and the material of the test walls. He even<br />

paid attention to the differences between the surfaces of tests in the<br />

Miliolidae, distinguishing there degrees of lustre, dull, oily, and porcellaneous<br />

or brilliant, and applying this differentiation in his division<br />

into "Formenkreise". Unfortunately, the series of forms established by<br />

him so meticulously are only of practical significance, they facilitate the<br />

identification of species, rather than of systematic import, because they<br />

do not include the internal structure of tests nor do they utilize the<br />

criterion of apertural structure fUlly, although they show first steps taken<br />

in this direction.<br />

Bogdanowich (1947 and 1952), who in his studies based himself chiefly<br />

on the classification of Brady (1884) and, partly, that of Wiesner (1932),<br />

did not go any further. In his monograph of the Miliolidae of the USSR<br />

(1952) he acknowledged the genus Miliolina Williamson together with its<br />

synonyms, among which he also numbered Miliolinella Wiesner. Later,<br />

Bogdanowich (in Rauzer-Chernousova & Fursenko, 1959) gave up the<br />

genus Miliolina and recognized the genera Quinqueloculina and Triloculina.<br />

He considered most of the former synonyms of Miliolina, e.g. Adelosina<br />

d'Orbigny, Massilina Schlumberger and Miliolinella Wiesner to be synonymous<br />

with the genus Quinqueloculina. However, he did not recognize<br />

the genus Biloculinella Wiesner in the paper referred to and treated it as<br />

a synonym of Pyrgo. As can be seen, in this classification the significance<br />

of apertural characters diminished compared with Wiesner's views and<br />

Bogdanowich laid stress on the internal structure and genetic relationships<br />

instead.<br />

The investigators who assented to and supplemented d'Orbigny's<br />

division of the Miliolidae into genera were, in the first place, Reuss, active<br />

in the middle of the nineteenth century, Schlumberger towards the end<br />

of the nineteenth century, and Cushman at the beginning of the present<br />

century. Reuss (1862) grouped the porcellaneous calcareous foraminifera

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!