28.12.2013 Views

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48 EWA LUCZKOWSKA<br />

Particular stages of the ontogenetic development of massiline forms<br />

may be observed on specimens the chambers of which are being removed<br />

successively (Text-fig. 14).<br />

Fig. 14. Quinqueloculina buchiana d'Orbigny and its juvenile stage, Lower Tortonian,<br />

Benczyn; 1 - MS; 2-4 - QS from inside of the MS; a front view, b apertural view.<br />

Remarks. - D'Orbigny (1846) described two species from the Miocene<br />

of the Vienna Basin, the morphology of which corresponds with that of<br />

our quinqueloculine forms: Quinqueloculina buchiana, having a smooth<br />

and polished test (d'Orbigny's illustration represents probably a damaged<br />

specimens with traces of regeneration) and Q. ungeriana, the surface of<br />

which is covered with oblique folds. Since such folds, regarded as signs<br />

of disturbances in the normal growth of tests may be observed in some<br />

specimens of both quinqueloculine and massiline forms not only in Q. buchiana<br />

but also in other species (e.g. Q. haidingeri d'Orbigny, Q. anagallis<br />

n.sp), Q. ungeriana has been recognized as a synonym of Q. buchiana.<br />

Q. ungeriana stenostoma Karrer is identical with the quinqueloculine<br />

forms of Q. buchiana and its corrugate border undoubtedly also represents<br />

marks of the abnormal growth of the test. Abundant specimens of Q. buchiana<br />

QS identical with ours were found in the materials from Baden,<br />

but none of them was massiline, probably owing to the small amount of<br />

the material examined. Surely, rare massiline forms were not observed<br />

by d'Orbigny either.<br />

Q. buchiana MS is morphologically nearly identical with Q. anagallis<br />

sp.n. MS, from which it however differs in having a more solid test and<br />

no ornamentation, but it is indistinguishable fromQ. haidingeri d'Orbigny<br />

MS, which is isomorphic but smaller. Differences between these two<br />

species are visible only in cross-sections which show high triangular<br />

quinqueloculine stage with flattened or slightly inflated sides and angular<br />

edges in Q. haidingeri MS (Text-fig. 16), whereas the quinqueloculine<br />

stage of Q. buchiana MS is lower, with flat or concave sides and acute,<br />

sharply keeled edges (Text-fig. 12).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!