MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>MILIOLIDAE</strong> FROM MIOCENE OF POLAND 37<br />
nerations (Text-fig. 4). The mega II generation has not been found. PD:<br />
micro 20!l' mega I 70-160fl.<br />
Ontogeny. - Only a few MS specimens have been found beside a large<br />
number of QS ones. The massiline stage was probably rarely attained in<br />
this species and mature individuals remained quinqueloculine. If we<br />
expose the juvenile stage by removing the external chambers of a specimen<br />
of "Quinqueloculina pauperata d'Orbigny" appearance, we receive<br />
a form of Quinqueloculina akneriana d'Orbigny appearance. (Text-fig. 5).<br />
lmm<br />
@a<br />
~b<br />
Fig. 5. Quinqueloculina akneriana d'Orbigny and its juvenile stage, Lower Tortonian,<br />
Wieliczka; 1 - MS; 2 - QS from inside MS; a front view, b apertural view.<br />
The morphology of tests derived from the same sample indicates the<br />
presence of transitional forms between Q. akneriana and "Q. pauperata"<br />
(Text-fig. 3).<br />
Remarks. - Our specimens are identical with the topotypes from<br />
Baden, but differ somewhat from d'Orbigny's illustration from 1846 in<br />
having a less rounded periphery. There is great morphological resemblance<br />
and probably also a relationship in internal structure between Q. akneriana<br />
and Q. triangularis d'Orbigny. Q. akneriana QS differs from Q. triangularis<br />
QS in its more· slender shape and more distinct and depressed<br />
sutures. The aperture shape and the internal structure are identical in<br />
these species. The difference in the shape of tooth noted by d'Orbigny is<br />
insignificant as both species may have either a simple or a bifid tooth.<br />
The MS of both species is however indistinguishable, even in slightly<br />
damaged specimens. The QS of the mega II generation of both species is<br />
probably indistinguishable too, hence they are hard to identify. In spite<br />
of this conformity the quinqueloculine stage of these two species can be<br />
easily distinguished from each other on the basis of the test shape and<br />
therefore they are not regarded here as synonyms, as they are by some<br />
authors (e.g. Marks 1951, Verhoeve 1970). In the materials from Baden<br />
(Sooss) and Wieliczka both species are common and they differ evidently<br />
one from another. Both authors mentioned above synonymize a number<br />
of other species of d'Orbigny, Reuss, Bornemann and even Q. seminulum