MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
32 EWA LUCZKOWSKA<br />
The character that these species have in common is their rough surface<br />
with short incised lines, quite different from the smooth and shiny "porcellaneous"<br />
surface in other species. Except for pointing at the supposed<br />
relationship between these forms, however, the presence of rough walls<br />
does not seem to be of any major taxonomic importance.<br />
A relationship can also be seen between different species of Quinqueloculina<br />
with shiny "porcellaneous" tests. It is manifested by the fact that.<br />
e.g. in some juvenile specimens of Quinqueloculina anagallis, whose tests<br />
are normally ornamented with ribs, an entirely smooth and shiny chamber<br />
appears as in Q. buchiana (PI. I, Fig. 1). The relationship between Q. peregrina<br />
and Q. dichotoma is another example; they have quite a 'similar<br />
shape and internal structure and differ only in that Q. dichotoma has its<br />
surface ornamented with ribs. Q. buchiana also resembles Q. pseudobuchiana<br />
in shape and internal structure but differs from it in having slightly<br />
rounded edges of the chambers instead of keeled ones. Q. akneriana<br />
and Q. triangularis are also related forms and differ only in that Q. triangularis<br />
has a broader and higher test. There are presumably other related<br />
species as well: Articulina sarmatica and A. multibullata, Pyrgoella ventruosa<br />
and P. controversa, Sinuloculina consobrina and S. nitens, Affinetrina<br />
gualtieriana and A. planciana (both having a rough surface with<br />
short incised lines), Varidentella reussi, V. sarmatica and V. latelacunata,<br />
V. pseudocostata and V. rotunda and many other species.<br />
INTERGENERIC TRANSITION FORMS<br />
Difficulties encountered in determining some miliolid genera result<br />
chiefly from the fact that there are species having "mixed" diagnostic<br />
characters, which rose doubts if these species have been included in<br />
appropriate genera. Such characters are, above all, the shape of the<br />
aperture and tooth and the number of chambers seen from the outside.<br />
For example, Gla