28.12.2013 Views

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

MILIOLIDAE - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 EWA LUCZKOWSKA<br />

Studying the sections of forms, from the juvenile to the adult or<br />

gerontic one, in different species, or observing the developmental stages<br />

of individual specimens, we can arrive at the following conclusions:<br />

1) The size of test does not depend on the number of chambers but,<br />

above all, on the size of the proloculus. The larger the proloculus, the<br />

fewer are the chambers in specimens of the same size or, in other words,<br />

the juvenile stage of the mega I or mega II generation may be the same<br />

size as the adult stage of the micro ~eneration. This is particularly well<br />

seen in the genera marked by the presence of three generation, Le. in<br />

Quinqueloculina, Triloculina and Pyrgo (e.g. Quinqueloculina anagallis,<br />

Text-figs. 7, 8; Q. buchiana, Text-figs. 12, 13; Q. lentica, Text-fig. 18;<br />

Q. parakneriana, Text-fig. 19; Q. pseudobuchiana, Text-fig. 20; Triloculina<br />

neudorfensis, Text-fig. 46).<br />

2) In the genus Quinqueloculina, producing the massiline adult (or<br />

gerontic?) stage (Part I, p. 346) such forms are met with that their membership<br />

in a given species is determined by the quinqueloculine i.e. juvenile<br />

stage only, since the massiline forms of various species closely<br />

resemble each other in shape. For example, Quinqueloculina buchiana MS,<br />

Q. pseudobuchiana MS and Q. haidingeri MS or Q. akneriana MS, Q. triangularis<br />

MS and Q. parakneriana MS are very much alike. At the same<br />

time the quinqueloculine stage is different in each of these species, in<br />

whose populations it besides prevails most frequently (except for Q. haidingeri,<br />

found mostly as MS), owing to which they can be distinguished<br />

without resorting to sections. This can be interpreted in two ways: either<br />

the genus Massilina actually exists and then the various shapes of the<br />

juvenile stage seen in the sections of similar forms indicate their polyphyletic<br />

origin or Massilina represents only an ontogenetic stage of Quinqueloculina,<br />

isomorphic in different species. The latter view has been<br />

assumed in the present work (see Part I).<br />

3) As can be seen from sections, in a number of genera some species<br />

do not differ in their juvenile stage and their individual characters do not<br />

differentiate before several initial chambers have been developed. For<br />

example, in Cycloforina contorta and C. lachesis tubular chambers occur<br />

in the juvenile stage as in C. gracilis and C. lucida (Text-figs 26, 28) and<br />

only in a later stage angular edges appear in C. contorta and C. lachesis,<br />

but not in the other two species. Tubular chambers of the juvenile stage<br />

are also observed in other species which have edges or ribs in the adult<br />

stage: Lachlanella schroekingeri (Text-fig. 33/3, 4), L. undosa (Text-fig.<br />

33/5, 6), Cycloforina badenensis (Text-fig. 25), Triloculina intermedia<br />

(Text-fig. 46/4), T. neudorfensis (Text-fig. 46/3), etc. In the genera Miliolinella<br />

and Varidentella, which are characterized by a turn of the coiling<br />

axis in the juvenile stage, this stage has a similar form in different<br />

species. It resembles Miliolinella circularis in appearance (e.g. in Varidentella<br />

reussi, Part I, PI. XIII, Fig. 3) and is very often identified as that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!