28.12.2013 Views

Impact of agricultural management on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal ...

Impact of agricultural management on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal ...

Impact of agricultural management on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

N. Mathimaran et al. / Agriculture, Ecosystems and Envir<strong>on</strong>ment 119 (2007) 22–32 25<br />

Hombrechtik<strong>on</strong>, Switzerland), ligated into a pDrive cl<strong>on</strong>ing<br />

vector (Qiagen), heat-shock transformed into DH5a<br />

competent cells, and selected <strong>on</strong> ampicillin media<br />

(100 mg l<br />

1 ). Plasmids c<strong>on</strong>taining inserts were isolated<br />

from overnight cultures by using a plasmid purificati<strong>on</strong> kit<br />

(Qiagen) and sequenced at Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland).<br />

Five cl<strong>on</strong>es per AMF species were sequenced. All<br />

sequences were manually edited and blasted against the<br />

GenBank sequence database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)<br />

to ensure affinities with glomalean sequences. The<br />

sequences successfully read in full length were deposited<br />

in the Genbank under accessi<strong>on</strong> numbers AY900494 through<br />

AY900517. Those sequences were aligned with a selecti<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sequences previously published in the Genbank by using<br />

Clustal X (Versi<strong>on</strong> 1.83), and used for c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

phylogenetic tree.<br />

2.5. Calculati<strong>on</strong>s and statistical analysis<br />

Spore abundances estimated <strong>on</strong> a fresh weight basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

field soil were adjusted to dry weight using the soil humidity<br />

values. Spore abundance classes in the trap pots were<br />

replaced with class means. AMF spore densities in each<br />

sample were calculated by summing abundances <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all<br />

species recorded in the sample. Species richness was<br />

calculated as a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species recorded in each sample.<br />

Shann<strong>on</strong>–Wiener diversity index (H 0 ) was calculated for<br />

each field sample/trap pot using the Eq. (1), where p i was the<br />

relative spore abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the i-th species am<strong>on</strong>g all N<br />

identified species in a sample.<br />

H 0 ¼<br />

XN<br />

i¼1<br />

p i lnð p i Þ (1)<br />

Two- and <strong>on</strong>e-way analyses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> variance (ANOVAs) were<br />

performed in Statgraphics (Versi<strong>on</strong> 3.1) so as to assess the<br />

effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crop rotati<strong>on</strong> and P fertilizati<strong>on</strong> in the field as well<br />

as the effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> soil P fertilizati<strong>on</strong> history and trap plant<br />

species identity in trap pots <strong>on</strong> AMF spore densities, species<br />

richness and diversity. These ANOVAs were performed<br />

with n<strong>on</strong>transformed data after ensuring c<strong>on</strong>formity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

data with ANOVA assumpti<strong>on</strong>s. Following significant<br />

ANOVAs, differences between treatment means were<br />

analyzed by multiple range comparis<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> leastsignificant<br />

difference (LSD). Further, the effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crop<br />

rotati<strong>on</strong> and P fertilizati<strong>on</strong> in the field as well as the effects<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> soil P fertilizati<strong>on</strong> history and trap plant species identity<br />

in the traps were assessed <strong>on</strong> AMF spore community<br />

compositi<strong>on</strong> (relative abundances <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the AMF species) by a<br />

multivariate redundancy analysis (RDA) in CANOCO<br />

(Versi<strong>on</strong> 4.5). Up<strong>on</strong> identificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors, or their<br />

interacti<strong>on</strong>s, which significantly affected community<br />

compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the AMF spores, the data were further<br />

analyzed by n<strong>on</strong>parametric Kruskal–Wallis test because<br />

significant deviati<strong>on</strong>s from ANOVA assumpti<strong>on</strong>s were<br />

noted in the datasets. Differences between treatment means<br />

were analyzed as above. Mean values with accompanying<br />

standard errors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> means are reported unless specified<br />

otherwise. Significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> results refer to p < 0.05, unless<br />

specified otherwise.<br />

3. Results<br />

3.1. Spore densities in the field soil and in the traps<br />

In field soil, low density <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> AMF spores was generally<br />

observed (0.94 0.08 per g dry weight soil). Spore<br />

densities were affected neither by crop rotati<strong>on</strong><br />

( p = 0.14) not by P fertilizati<strong>on</strong> ( p =0.34) nor by<br />

interacti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the two above factors ( p =0.31). In trap<br />

pots, a mean <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 7.40 0.71 spores per g fresh weight<br />

substrate was found. The spore densities were significantly<br />

affected by plant species identity in the trap pots<br />

( p < 0.001), but not by P fertilizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> field soil used<br />

for setting up the traps ( p = 0.76) nor by the interacti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

plant species and P fertilizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the soil ( p =0.96).<br />

Significantly more spores were found under crotalaria<br />

(14.2 1.75 per g fresh weight substrate) than under any<br />

other plant species in the traps. Maize in trap pots supported<br />

significantly higher spore densities (8.97 1.16 g 1 )than<br />

sunflower (3.66 0.89 g 1 )orleek(2.75 0.54 g 1 ).<br />

3.2. Identificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> AMF species<br />

Identificati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> spore morphologies indicated<br />

presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 AMF species in the field soil and 16 species<br />

in the trap pots (see electr<strong>on</strong>ic supplementary materials for<br />

photos). Altogether, 18 AMF species were recorded either in<br />

the field soil or in the traps (Table 1). Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these species<br />

were not detected in field soils, but were found exclusively in<br />

the trap pots (Acaulospora lacunosa, A. laevis, Archaeospora<br />

trappei, Glomus lamellosum, G. microaggregatum,<br />

Scutellopora heterogama, S. pellucida, and S. persica).<br />

Spores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two species (Glomus fasciculatum and Scutellospora<br />

dipurpurascens) previously observed in field soil could<br />

not be detected in the traps. DNA sequences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> six out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

eight AMF species subjected to PCR and cl<strong>on</strong>ing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> LSU<br />

showed similarities with glomalean sequences and were thus<br />

included into the phylogenetic analysis. All sequences from<br />

spores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> A. denticulata and A. scrobiculata proved to<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>g to asco and basidiomycetous fungi and, therefore,<br />

were excluded from the phylogenetic analysis. The LSU<br />

from any <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the six AMF species from which we obtained the<br />

sequence data has never been sequenced before (or<br />

sequences are not yet available in public databases).<br />

Therefore, species affiliati<strong>on</strong>s were not possible to compare<br />

with other datasets, although affinities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sequenced<br />

AMF species to their genera could be broadly c<strong>on</strong>firmed (see<br />

electr<strong>on</strong>ic supplementary materials for the phylogram). The<br />

LSU sequences from spores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. nigra, S. heterogama, S.<br />

verrucosa, and G. gigantea clustered together with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!