K - College of Natural Resources - University of California, Berkeley
K - College of Natural Resources - University of California, Berkeley
K - College of Natural Resources - University of California, Berkeley
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Descriptions <strong>of</strong> all outbreaks and issues specific to each dataset are outlined later in the<br />
SOM.<br />
For the Poisson, geometric and negative binomial models, the maximum<br />
likelihood estimate <strong>of</strong> the basic reproductive number (R0 or R) was the sample mean<br />
(Rice 1995). For the negative binomial distribution, the shape parameter k was also<br />
estimated by maximum likelihood estimation (mle). A numerical algorithm was used<br />
for maximization, which required that an upper bound be set for the range <strong>of</strong> k sampled.<br />
This upper bound was set to k=1000, and when this bound was returned as the mle<br />
estimate then ˆ was set to infinity, because a NegB(R0,k=1000) distribution is<br />
k mle<br />
indistinguishable in practice from Poisson(R0).<br />
Having computed the maximum likelihood scores for each dataset, we compared<br />
the Poisson, geometric and negative binomial models using Akaike’s information<br />
criterion (AIC) (Anderson et al. 2000):<br />
where ( L(<br />
ˆ | data )<br />
( L(<br />
ˆ | data ) K<br />
AIC = -2 ln θ + 2<br />
ln θ is the log-likelihood maximized over the unknown parameters (θ),<br />
given the model and the data, and K is the number <strong>of</strong> parameters estimated in the model.<br />
Because some <strong>of</strong> our datasets are small, we used the modified criterion AICc, which<br />
reduces to the conventional expression as sample size N becomes larger (Anderson et al.<br />
2000):<br />
AIC c<br />
= -2 ln θ<br />
( ( ˆ<br />
2K<br />
) ( K + 1)<br />
L | data + 2K<br />
+<br />
129<br />
N − K −1