genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...
genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ... genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...
Maren Depke Introduction phenotype of macrophages changes from production of IL-12 to IL-10 production, whereas TNFα, IL-1, and IL-6 are still secreted (Mosser 2003). Type II activation initiates a Th2-based immune response. There is experimental evidence that the phenotype of macrophages is primarily determined by the first cytokine type to which they are subjected (Erwig et al. 1998). A naïve macrophage can react to activation stimuli. Nevertheless, when the macrophage received a priming signal in advance, it had the possibility to prepare for the potentially following second stimulus by transcriptional regulation and is able to react stronger and faster to activation. Low-dose IFN-γ is the most important macrophage priming signal. Primed macrophages are not activated yet and do not secrete proinflammatory cytokines. This occurs in classical activation after a second signal like IFN-γ or LPS, peptidoglycan, and others (Dalton et al. 1993, Huang et al. 1993, Ma J et al. 2003, Mosser 2003). Fig. I.6: Inducers and selected functional properties of different polarized macrophage populations. Abbreviations: DTH – delayed-type hypersensitivity; IC – immune complexes; IFN-γ – interferon-γ; iNOS – inducible nitric oxide synthase; LPS – lipopolysaccharide; MR – mannose receptor; PTX3 – the long pentraxin PTX3; RNI – reactive nitrogen intermediates; ROI – reactive oxygen intermediates; SLAM – signaling lymphocytic activation molecule; SRs – scavenger receptors; TLR – Toll-like receptor. From: Mantovani et al. 2004. Studies aiming to analyze the reaction in general and more specific the gene expression pattern of macrophages are impaired by the influence of immunological factors on the mature macrophages which can be prepared from animal organs, even under highly standardized laboratory conditions. This problem can be circumvented when using bone-marrow derived macrophages (BMM). Bone marrow stem cells are prepared from the animal and cultivated in vitro for proliferation and differentiation. Under the influence of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) cells differentiate into macrophages, which have the advantage of having never received any in vivo stimulus or immunological conditioning that might influence their cellular reaction. Until recently, further uncontrollable influences on macrophage or BMM experiments were introduced by the utilization of serum-supplemented culture medium. Serum contains immune 34
Maren Depke Introduction cell stimulating substances like cytokines, hormones or endotoxin, and to worsen the problem, these substances might vary not only between the sera from different vendors but also between batches of serum from the same manufacturer. To overcome such sources of experimental variation, Eske et al. introduced in 2009 serum-free culture conditions for BMM. Standard cell culture medium RPMI 1640 was supplemented with a defined mixture of proteins, hormones, and other compounds. Differentiation of stem cells with recombinant murine GM-CSF yielded BMM expressing macrophage markers F4/80, CD11b, CD11c, MOMA-2, and CD13 after 10 days of cultivation, and further characteristics of BMM differentiated in serum-containing medium were additionally retained (Eske et al. 2009). Host-pathogen interaction experiments have revealed differences in reactions of BMM derived from BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice when confronted with Burkholderia pseudomallei especially after IFN-γ stimulation and at higher multiplicities of infection (MOI). Also other infection studies uncovered differences between these two mouse strains in vivo and in vitro (Breitbach et al. 2006, Autenrieth et al. 1994, van Erp et al. 2006). The mouse strains BALB/c and C57BL/6 are characterized by a Th2 and Th1 centered type of immune response, respectively. Accordingly and possibly causatively, the main type of macrophage activation differs between the strains, with BALB/c preponderating the alternative macrophage activation pattern and C57BL/6 prevailing classical activation (Mills et al. 2000). Against the background of genetic influences on the BMM reactions, a combined proteome (Dinh Hoang Dang Khoa) and transcriptome (Maren Depke) study was initiated. In a first experiment, BALB/c and C57BL/6 BMM were stimulated with IFN-γ to specify on a molecular level the reaction to the priming signal IFN-γ as basic principle. Furthermore, the study aimed to profile potential differences of reaction between the BMM of both mouse strains. Model Systems for Studies of Host-Pathogen Interactions S. aureus strain RN1HG The genetic background of different S. aureus strains influences the reaction of the bacterium to experimental conditions. Therefore, the strain for experimental analysis must be chosen carefully because not all observations can be transferred from one to another S. aureus strain. The number of strains available for studies of S. aureus has grown recently when the group of Friedrich Götz (Department of Microbial Genetics, Eberhards-Karls University of Tübingen, Germany) provided a rsbU + repaired RN1-derivative strain called RN1HG(001) and later tcaR + and rsbU + tcaR + repaired RN1-derivative strains to the scientific community (Herbert et al. 2010). The parental strain RN1 (NCTC8325) has already been widely used as model organism for diverse studies on staphylococcal physiology. On the other hand its defect in the important regulator rsbU was known (Kullik/Giachino 1997), which resulted in compromised conclusions from studies addressing the regulation of virulence factors (Giachino et al. 2001). Therefore, strain RN1HG in which the mutation in the regulatory gene rsbU has been complemented has been chosen in the experimental setup of the studies described in this thesis. 35
- Page 1 and 2: G E N O M E W I D E C H A R A C T E
- Page 3 and 4: Maren Depke C O N T E N T S GENOMEW
- Page 5 and 6: Maren Depke Z U S A M M E N F A S S
- Page 7 and 8: Maren Depke Zusammenfassung der Dis
- Page 9 and 10: Maren Depke S U M M A R Y O F D I S
- Page 11 and 12: Maren Depke Summary of Dissertation
- Page 13 and 14: Maren Depke I N T R O D U C T I O N
- Page 15 and 16: Maren Depke Introduction Besides op
- Page 17 and 18: Maren Depke Introduction Extracellu
- Page 19 and 20: Maren Depke Introduction with heigh
- Page 21 and 22: Maren Depke Introduction 2005). SaP
- Page 23 and 24: Maren Depke Introduction contains a
- Page 25 and 26: Maren Depke Introduction via fibron
- Page 27 and 28: Maren Depke Introduction cathelicid
- Page 29 and 30: Maren Depke Introduction shock are
- Page 31 and 32: Maren Depke Introduction STUDIES OF
- Page 33: Maren Depke Introduction are effect
- Page 37 and 38: Maren Depke Introduction channel CF
- Page 39 and 40: Maren Depke M A T E R I A L A N D M
- Page 41: Maren Depke Material and Methods Li
- Page 44 and 45: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ki
- Page 47 and 48: Maren Depke Material and Methods GE
- Page 49: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ge
- Page 52 and 53: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ho
- Page 54 and 55: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ho
- Page 56 and 57: Maren Depke Material and Methods Pa
- Page 58 and 59: Maren Depke Material and Methods Pa
- Page 60 and 61: Maren Depke Material and Methods Pa
- Page 63 and 64: corticosterone [pg/ml plasma] corti
- Page 65 and 66: Maren Depke Results Liver Gene Expr
- Page 67 and 68: lood glucose levels [nmol/l] resist
- Page 69 and 70: LBP [ng/ml] CPR [ng/ml] Maren Depke
- Page 71 and 72: Maren Depke Results Liver Gene Expr
- Page 73 and 74: liver weight [g] Maren Depke Result
- Page 75 and 76: infection rate cfu / 10 mg tissue c
- Page 77 and 78: Maren Depke Results Kidney Gene Exp
- Page 79 and 80: Table R.2.1: Genes displaying stati
- Page 81 and 82: Maren Depke BR1 sign DsigB vs wt BR
- Page 83 and 84: Maren Depke Results Kidney Gene Exp
Maren Depke<br />
Introduction<br />
phenotype <strong>of</strong> macrophages changes from production <strong>of</strong> IL-12 to IL-10 production, whereas TNFα,<br />
IL-1, and IL-6 are still secreted (Mosser 2003). Type II activation initiates a Th2-based immune<br />
response. There is experimental evidence that the phenotype <strong>of</strong> macrophages is primarily<br />
determined <strong>by</strong> the first cytokine type to which they are subjected (Erwig et al. 1998).<br />
A naïve macrophage can react to activation stimuli. Nevertheless, when the macrophage<br />
received a priming signal in advance, it had the possibility to prepare for the potentially following<br />
second stimulus <strong>by</strong> transcriptional regulation and is able to react stronger and faster to<br />
activation. Low-dose IFN-γ is the most important macrophage priming signal. Primed<br />
macrophages are not activated yet and do not secrete proinflammatory cytokines. This occurs in<br />
classical activation after a second signal like IFN-γ or LPS, peptidoglycan, and others (Dalton et al.<br />
1993, Huang et al. 1993, Ma J et al. 2003, Mosser 2003).<br />
Fig. I.6: Inducers and selected functional properties <strong>of</strong> different polarized macrophage populations.<br />
Abbreviations: DTH – delayed-type hypersensitivity; IC – immune complexes; IFN-γ – interferon-γ; iNOS – inducible nitric oxide<br />
synthase; LPS – lipopolysaccharide; MR – mannose receptor; PTX3 – the long pentraxin PTX3; RNI – reactive nitrogen intermediates;<br />
ROI – reactive oxygen intermediates; SLAM – signaling lymphocytic activation molecule; SRs – scavenger receptors; TLR – Toll-like<br />
receptor.<br />
From: Mantovani et al. 2004.<br />
Studies aiming to analyze the reaction in general and more specific the gene expression<br />
pattern <strong>of</strong> macrophages are impaired <strong>by</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> immunological factors on the mature<br />
macrophages which can be prepared from animal organs, even under highly standardized<br />
laboratory conditions. This problem can be circumvented when using bone-marrow derived<br />
macrophages (BMM). Bone marrow stem cells are prepared from the animal and cultivated<br />
in vitro for proliferation and differentiation. Under the influence <strong>of</strong> granulocyte-macrophage<br />
colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) cells differentiate into macrophages, which have the<br />
advantage <strong>of</strong> having never received any in vivo stimulus or immunological conditioning that<br />
might influence their cellular reaction.<br />
Until recently, further uncontrollable influences on macrophage or BMM experiments were<br />
introduced <strong>by</strong> the utilization <strong>of</strong> serum-supplemented culture medium. Serum contains immune<br />
34