28.12.2013 Views

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Maren Depke<br />

Introduction<br />

Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> S. aureus Adaptation to its Environment<br />

For its survival in changing environments, the bacterium needs an adaptive response and thus<br />

an effective regulation <strong>of</strong> all cellular processes including gene expression, protein synthesis, and<br />

turnover allowing adaptation to different conditions. Such regulation not only controls cell<br />

division and metabolism, but also systems for exploiting limited nutrients, adaptation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the cell wall as outer boundary, surface factors like adhesins, and systems<br />

rendering stress resistance and guaranteeing endurance in situations non-favorable for growth or<br />

survival. In bacteria, the regulation <strong>of</strong>ten affects the transcription <strong>of</strong> genes as starting point for<br />

changes in the following levels like protein synthesis. Two-component systems (TCS) mediate the<br />

sensing <strong>of</strong> environmental signals with the sensor component and the adequate reaction with the<br />

response regulator component. An example for such TCS is the agr system. Additionally,<br />

transcription factors like SarA modulate staphylococcal gene expression (Cheung et al. 2004).<br />

Another well-conserved system is the use <strong>of</strong> alternative sigma factors. Transcription in<br />

bacteria is only initiated when the catalytic core complex <strong>of</strong> RNA polymerase, formed <strong>of</strong> the five<br />

subunits α 2 ββ’ω, is associated with a sigma factor recognizing the promoter (-10/-35-region). A<br />

so-called house-keeping sigma factor (in S. aureus: σ A ; Deora/Misra 1995) maintains the baseline<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> a “standard” set <strong>of</strong> genes that is generally needed <strong>by</strong> the cell. Alternative sigmafactors<br />

are activated in specific situations, e. g. after heat shock or salt stress. They recognize a<br />

specific set <strong>of</strong> promoters <strong>of</strong> genes whose function is required to encounter the corresponding<br />

physiological conditions. This set <strong>of</strong> genes includes further transcriptional regulators which<br />

themselves positively or negatively influence the expression <strong>of</strong> genes depending on the need <strong>of</strong><br />

the bacterial cell. S. aureus possesses three alternative sigma factors: σ B , σ H , and − most recently<br />

discovered − σ S (Wu et al. 1996; Morikawa et al. 2003; Shaw et al. 2008). SigB is homologous to<br />

sigB <strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis which has been subjected to intensive studies. Despite the similarity <strong>of</strong><br />

sigB in B. subtilis and S. aureus, only half <strong>of</strong> the gene cluster coding for proteins belonging to the<br />

control cascade <strong>of</strong> SigB activation/inactivation (rsbU-rsbV-rsbW-sigB) is conserved in S. aureus. Of<br />

special importance is the gene rsbU, coding for the phosphatase that is the starting point for<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> the alternative sigma factor SigB. After dephosphorylation <strong>by</strong> RsbU the anti-antisigma<br />

factor RsbV becomes active and binds RsbW leading to liberation <strong>of</strong> SigB from its antisigma<br />

factor RsbW. Contrarily to B. subtilis where further rsb gene products are regulators <strong>of</strong><br />

RsbU activity, in S. aureus an increase in RsbU already leads to SigB activation (Senn et al. 2005).<br />

Deletion <strong>of</strong> sigB in S. aureus leads among other things to a loss <strong>of</strong> pigmentation, increased<br />

sedimentation rate and increased sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide in the stationary growth<br />

phase. Different effects are observed on the expression <strong>of</strong> genes and on the abundance <strong>of</strong><br />

proteins. On the one hand some proteins are missing in sigB deletion mutants (e. g. Asp23) that<br />

are directly regulated and transcribed <strong>by</strong> SigB. On the other hand, other proteins have a higher<br />

abundance in the sigB deletion mutants (e. g. lipase, thermonuclease). For such genes a negative<br />

regulation <strong>by</strong> SigB itself or a SigB controlled regulator is basis <strong>of</strong> the regulation observed (Kullik et<br />

al. 1998). Bisch<strong>of</strong>f et al. (2004) propose YabJ, SpoVG, SarA, SarS and ArlRS as regulators possibly<br />

responsible for the indirect SigB effects.<br />

The SigB regulon in S. aureus has some similarities to that <strong>of</strong> B. subtilis, but the main function<br />

to obtain a broad-range stress resistance to the triggering stimulus and in advance also to other<br />

stressors is not conserved in S. aureus. Energy and ethanol stress do not trigger a SigB response<br />

in S. aureus. Nevertheless, some stress conditions such as heat shock, MnCl 2 , NaCl and alkaline<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!