genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...
genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ... genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...
Maren Depke Introduction extracellular fibrinogen-binding protein Efb. Efb most probably inhibits the binding of C3b, the bigger fragment of C3 after cleavage during complement activation, to the bacterial surface and therefore reduces opsonization. Efb is able to bind both C3 and fibrinogen at the same time, because the C3-binding region is located C-terminal and the fibrinogen-binding region N-terminal in the Efb protein (Lee et al. 2004a, 2004b). More recently, a homologous and 44 % identical protein to Efb was identified. The protein called “Efb homologous protein”, Ehp, features the same C3b-deposition inhibitory function as Efb does, but in an even more potent manner. An additional C3-binding domain is proposed to cause this stronger inhibitory effect (Hammel et al. 2007). S. aureus does not only use its own proteins for immune-modulatory purposes, but also engages and manipulates host factors to perform a protective effect for the bacterium. Host plasminogen is the inactive precursor of the serine protease plasmin, which is the main enzyme involved in fibrinolysis, the degradation of fibrin clots after injury and blood coagulation. Bacterial staphylokinase binds plasminogen to the staphylococcal cell surface and mediates the activation of the precursor into active plasmin. The plasminogen activation mechanism is not mediated via cleavage by staphylokinase as the bacterial protein does not possess enzymatic activity. More precisely, staphylokinase binds plasminogen in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio and renders the enzyme precursor by formation changes more susceptible for activation. Activation finally occurs by other already active proteases, e. g. trace amounts of plasmin, which are able to start a reinforcing activation cascade (Silence et al. 1995). In a simple mode, active plasmin will help the pathogen to spread from site of infection, either by enzymatic fibrinolysis of blood coagulation clots or by degradation of extracellular matrix molecules. More sophisticated, the activated plasmin protease molecules degrade IgG and C3b from the bacterial surface and thus reverse opsonization (Rooijakkers et al. 2005a). When S. aureus is finally phagocytosed it has to deal with reactive oxygen species (ROS). Superoxide dismutase enzymes and non-enzymatic superoxide dismutase Mn 2+ inactivate superoxide anion O 2 – . Deletion mutants in superoxide dismutase or manganese cation uptake systems are less virulent than wild type strains. When ROS react with protein residues to methionine sulfoxide, these residues are reduced by methionine sulphoxide reductases, which also have impact on in vivo virulence (Foster 2005, Horsburgh et al. 2002a, Karavolos et al. 2003, Singh/Moskovitz 2003). Modulation of complement, opsonization and phagocytosis is not the only mechanism S. aureus applies for immune evasion. It also developed resistance mechanisms against killing by antimicrobial peptides, especially after phagocytosis, when the four groups of antimicrobial substances interfere with the bacterial integrity: small anionic peptides (e. g. dermicidin in airway surfactant), small cationic peptides (e. g. cathelicidins in neutrophils), cationic disulphide bond forming peptides (e. g. α- and β-defensins), and anionic and cationic peptide fragments derived from larger proteins (Foster, 2005). In this context, staphylokinase has a further function. It binds α-defensins, which are secreted by neutrophils, and inhibits most of the defensins’ bactericidal potency (Jin et al. 2004). Vice versa, defensins inhibit the staphylokinase’s ability of activating plasminogen. This effect can be relevant in clinical settings when recombinant staphylokinase (sakSTAR) is planned to be developed into a thrombolytic pharmaceutical and might be applied in inflammation paralleled disorders like vascular occlusive diseases (Bokarewa/Tarkowski 2004). S. aureus secretes different proteases. One of them, aureolysin, cleaves the bactericidal peptide 26
Maren Depke Introduction cathelicidin LL-37 at a special site, which is not recognized by the V8 protease. After aureolysin cleavage, LL-37 loses its antistaphylococcal activity (Sieprawska-Lupa et al. 2004). S. aureus cell wall is subjected to modifications of the teichoic acid structure. Dlt proteins (encoded by the dltABCD operon) lead to D-alanine incorporation. The alanine residues are further esterified. Without these alanine esters the bacterial surface would carry a strongly negative net charge, which would attract positively charged cationic antimicrobial molecules. Therefore, Dlt decreases the vulnerability of the bacterial cell wall via reduction of molecule charge (Peschel et al. 1999). On the other hand, a stronger negative charge would reduce S. aureus’ capacity to adhere to polystyrene or glass. Dlt mutants are thus impaired in their capability of biofilm formation (Gross et al. 2001). Also the MprF protein neutralizes charges of the cell wall, in this case by linking lysine to phosphatidylglycerol (Peschel et al. 2001). Biofilm formation, which is often associated with intra-vascular medical devices like catheters, is another option for S. aureus to protect the bacterial cells from the immune system and antimicrobials. The material of the medical devices will be covered with host (serum) molecules like fibrinogen or fibronectin soon after implantation. Therefore, it serves as an ideal attachment site for the various adhesins of staphylococci (Lowy 1998). In biofilms, S. aureus aggregates in a multi-cellular structure which already hinders contact between immune cells and substances with bacterial cells by physical means. Bacterial cells are surrounded by a polysaccharide matrix, composed of poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG). The ica operon, which is present in almost all S. aureus strains although not all of them form biofilms in in vitro assays, encodes the proteins necessary for PNAG biosynthesis. Its expression is regulated by IcaR and TcaR and the environmental conditions, and SarA and its homologues influence the regulation. Quorum sensing mechanisms are important in coordination of the individual bacterial cell’s gene expression, which enables the establishment of the biofilm (Fitzpatrick et al. 2005, Grinholc et al. 2007). For bacteria, the most effective way of evading the immune response is to hide inside the host cell. Intracellularly, S. aureus can mask its presence by changing its phenotype into the so-called small colony variant (SCV). These variants are characterized by physiological adaptation like slow growth and reduced toxin production, which is caused by alterations of the electron transport chain. They contribute to persistence and recurrence of staphylococcal infections (McNamara/Proctor 2000, von Eiff et al. 2006) Not all staphylococcal strains harbor the information for all virulence factors in their genome, and they do not necessarily express all virulence factors which are encoded. Virulence factor expression is limited by strict regulation to avoid wasting of energy or nutrient resources. Furthermore, the long list of different virulence factors and mechanism underlines the fact that S. aureus virulence factors are both redundant and multiple in function, with several factors performing the same or similar function and also one factor harboring several functions (Gordon RJ/Lowy 2008). 27
- Page 1 and 2: G E N O M E W I D E C H A R A C T E
- Page 3 and 4: Maren Depke C O N T E N T S GENOMEW
- Page 5 and 6: Maren Depke Z U S A M M E N F A S S
- Page 7 and 8: Maren Depke Zusammenfassung der Dis
- Page 9 and 10: Maren Depke S U M M A R Y O F D I S
- Page 11 and 12: Maren Depke Summary of Dissertation
- Page 13 and 14: Maren Depke I N T R O D U C T I O N
- Page 15 and 16: Maren Depke Introduction Besides op
- Page 17 and 18: Maren Depke Introduction Extracellu
- Page 19 and 20: Maren Depke Introduction with heigh
- Page 21 and 22: Maren Depke Introduction 2005). SaP
- Page 23 and 24: Maren Depke Introduction contains a
- Page 25: Maren Depke Introduction via fibron
- Page 29 and 30: Maren Depke Introduction shock are
- Page 31 and 32: Maren Depke Introduction STUDIES OF
- Page 33 and 34: Maren Depke Introduction are effect
- Page 35 and 36: Maren Depke Introduction cell stimu
- Page 37 and 38: Maren Depke Introduction channel CF
- Page 39 and 40: Maren Depke M A T E R I A L A N D M
- Page 41: Maren Depke Material and Methods Li
- Page 44 and 45: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ki
- Page 47 and 48: Maren Depke Material and Methods GE
- Page 49: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ge
- Page 52 and 53: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ho
- Page 54 and 55: Maren Depke Material and Methods Ho
- Page 56 and 57: Maren Depke Material and Methods Pa
- Page 58 and 59: Maren Depke Material and Methods Pa
- Page 60 and 61: Maren Depke Material and Methods Pa
- Page 63 and 64: corticosterone [pg/ml plasma] corti
- Page 65 and 66: Maren Depke Results Liver Gene Expr
- Page 67 and 68: lood glucose levels [nmol/l] resist
- Page 69 and 70: LBP [ng/ml] CPR [ng/ml] Maren Depke
- Page 71 and 72: Maren Depke Results Liver Gene Expr
- Page 73 and 74: liver weight [g] Maren Depke Result
- Page 75 and 76: infection rate cfu / 10 mg tissue c
Maren Depke<br />
Introduction<br />
extracellular fibrinogen-binding protein Efb. Efb most probably inhibits the binding <strong>of</strong> C3b, the<br />
bigger fragment <strong>of</strong> C3 after cleavage during complement activation, to the bacterial surface and<br />
therefore reduces opsonization. Efb is able to bind both C3 and fibrinogen at the same time,<br />
because the C3-binding region is located C-terminal and the fibrinogen-binding region N-terminal<br />
in the Efb protein (Lee et al. 2004a, 2004b). More recently, a homologous and 44 % identical<br />
protein to Efb was identified. The protein called “Efb homologous protein”, Ehp, features the<br />
same C3b-deposition inhibitory function as Efb does, but in an even more potent manner. An<br />
additional C3-binding domain is proposed to cause this stronger inhibitory effect (Hammel et al.<br />
2007).<br />
S. aureus does not only use its own proteins for immune-modulatory purposes, but also<br />
engages and manipulates <strong>host</strong> factors to perform a protective effect for the bacterium. Host<br />
plasminogen is the inactive precursor <strong>of</strong> the serine protease plasmin, which is the main enzyme<br />
involved in fibrinolysis, the degradation <strong>of</strong> fibrin clots after injury and blood coagulation. Bacterial<br />
staphylokinase binds plasminogen to the staphylococcal cell surface and mediates the activation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the precursor into active plasmin. The plasminogen activation mechanism is not mediated via<br />
cleavage <strong>by</strong> staphylokinase as the bacterial protein does not possess enzymatic activity. More<br />
precisely, staphylokinase binds plasminogen in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio and renders the enzyme<br />
precursor <strong>by</strong> formation changes more susceptible for activation. Activation finally occurs <strong>by</strong> other<br />
already active proteases, e. g. trace amounts <strong>of</strong> plasmin, which are able to start a reinforcing<br />
activation cascade (Silence et al. 1995). In a simple mode, active plasmin will help the <strong>pathogen</strong><br />
to spread from site <strong>of</strong> infection, either <strong>by</strong> enzymatic fibrinolysis <strong>of</strong> blood coagulation clots or <strong>by</strong><br />
degradation <strong>of</strong> extracellular matrix molecules. More sophisticated, the activated plasmin<br />
protease molecules degrade IgG and C3b from the bacterial surface and thus reverse<br />
opsonization (Rooijakkers et al. 2005a).<br />
When S. aureus is finally phagocytosed it has to deal with reactive oxygen species (ROS).<br />
Superoxide dismutase enzymes and non-enzymatic superoxide dismutase Mn 2+ inactivate<br />
superoxide anion O 2 – . Deletion mutants in superoxide dismutase or manganese cation uptake<br />
systems are less virulent than wild type strains. When ROS react with protein residues to<br />
methionine sulfoxide, these residues are reduced <strong>by</strong> methionine sulphoxide reductases, which<br />
also have impact on in vivo virulence (Foster 2005, Horsburgh et al. 2002a, Karavolos et al. 2003,<br />
Singh/Moskovitz 2003).<br />
Modulation <strong>of</strong> complement, opsonization and phagocytosis is not the only mechanism<br />
S. aureus applies for immune evasion. It also developed resistance mechanisms against killing <strong>by</strong><br />
antimicrobial peptides, especially after phagocytosis, when the four groups <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial<br />
substances interfere with the bacterial integrity: small anionic peptides (e. g. dermicidin in airway<br />
surfactant), small cationic peptides (e. g. cathelicidins in neutrophils), cationic disulphide bond<br />
forming peptides (e. g. α- and β-defensins), and anionic and cationic peptide fragments derived<br />
from larger proteins (Foster, 2005). In this context, staphylokinase has a further function. It binds<br />
α-defensins, which are secreted <strong>by</strong> neutrophils, and inhibits most <strong>of</strong> the defensins’ bactericidal<br />
potency (Jin et al. 2004). Vice versa, defensins inhibit the staphylokinase’s ability <strong>of</strong> activating<br />
plasminogen. This effect can be relevant in clinical settings when recombinant staphylokinase<br />
(sakSTAR) is planned to be developed into a thrombolytic pharmaceutical and might be applied in<br />
inflammation paralleled disorders like vascular occlusive diseases (Bokarewa/Tarkowski 2004).<br />
S. aureus secretes different proteases. One <strong>of</strong> them, aureolysin, cleaves the bactericidal peptide<br />
26