genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...
genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...
genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Maren Depke<br />
Discussion and Conclusions<br />
genes repressed (Garzoni et al. 2007) or induced (this study), saeRS repressed (Garzoni et al.<br />
2007) or induced (this study).<br />
Clearly, the comparability is limited due to experimental differences, which underlines the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> performing global molecular studies (transcriptome and proteome pr<strong>of</strong>iling) in<br />
different models to finally achieve a complete picture <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>host</strong>-<strong>pathogen</strong><br />
<strong>interactions</strong>.<br />
Such different models include e. g. other epithelial cell lines, like the S9 cells used in this study,<br />
but can also be extended to immune cells. Such a study was performed <strong>by</strong> Voyich and colleagues<br />
in 2005. The authors analyzed the gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> different S. aureus strains upon<br />
phagocytosis <strong>by</strong> human neutrophils (Voyich et al. 2005). Again, several experimental parameters<br />
differed between the studies <strong>of</strong> Voyich and colleagues (2005), Garzoni and colleagues (2007), and<br />
this study, partly resulting from the very different <strong>host</strong> cell type employed <strong>by</strong> Voyich and<br />
coworkers. The authors described immune evasion mechanisms <strong>of</strong> S. aureus, which are initiated<br />
<strong>by</strong> transcriptional changes. First, the authors observed induction <strong>of</strong> stress response genes, e. g.<br />
superoxide dismutases sodA and sodM and several other genes involved in counteracting the<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> reactive oxygen intermediates. An as strong response was not observed in this study,<br />
which can be explained <strong>by</strong> the innate function <strong>of</strong> neutrophils to kill <strong>pathogen</strong>s, which is not given<br />
for epithelial cells. Thus, staphylococci internalized in S9 cells probably encounter less harmful<br />
molecules than staphylococci after uptake <strong>by</strong> neutrophils. The induction <strong>of</strong> TCA cycle genes after<br />
phagocytosis <strong>by</strong> neutrophils (Voyich et al. 2005) corresponds with results from this study using S9<br />
cells. Voyich and coworkers observed repression <strong>of</strong> genes involved in cell envelope synthesis, cell<br />
division, and replication, which was not as obvious in S9 cell internalized staphylococci.<br />
Nevertheless, cell wall remodeling processes were concluded from gene expression data (this<br />
study). Furthermore, staphylococci in neutrophils induced several toxins and adhesins (Voyich et<br />
al. 2005), <strong>of</strong> which some were also observed after S9 cell internalization, e. g. hlgB, hlgC, lukD,<br />
lukE; fnbB, coa, clfA (this study). The toxin gene induction appeared to be stronger in the<br />
neutrophil than in the S9 study, although hla was induced after internalization in S9 cells and not<br />
after phagocytosis <strong>by</strong> neutrophils. Anyway, the different staphylococcal strains, which were used<br />
in the studies, contribute considerably to the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the gene expression signature<br />
(Voyich et al. 2005). In the neutrophil phagocytosis dependent gene expression pattern,<br />
differential expression <strong>of</strong> regulatory genes was reported (Voyich et al. 2005). These included<br />
increased expression <strong>of</strong> vraRS, saeRS, and sarA. While induction or a trend <strong>of</strong> induction <strong>of</strong> saeRS<br />
and vraRS was also visible in this study, sarA was not differentially expressed when staphylococci<br />
were internalized in S9 cells. Furthermore, repression <strong>of</strong> agr or sigB was not observed in this<br />
study, but in the study <strong>of</strong> Voyich and coworkers.<br />
In total, after comparison <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> Voyich and colleagues (2005), Garzoni and<br />
colleagues (2007), and this study, it becomes clear that similarities in certain aspects do not<br />
necessarily lead to completely consistent results. This probably depends to a large extent on the<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>host</strong> cell and bacterial strain, but also on further experimental conditions which<br />
varied strongly between the studies. Nevertheless, parts <strong>of</strong> the results were also found in other<br />
studies. Since an admittedly slightly imprecise attempt to specify real internalization specific gene<br />
expression that did not occur in control samples revealed virulence associated genes in the study<br />
described in this thesis, the recorded gene expression pattern is probably physiologically<br />
relevant. Therefore, the gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling turned out to be an important basic study<br />
which will entail follow-up experiments like studies <strong>of</strong> bacterial mutants, comparison <strong>of</strong> different<br />
204