28.12.2013 Views

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Maren Depke<br />

Discussion and Conclusions<br />

genes repressed (Garzoni et al. 2007) or induced (this study), saeRS repressed (Garzoni et al.<br />

2007) or induced (this study).<br />

Clearly, the comparability is limited due to experimental differences, which underlines the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> performing global molecular studies (transcriptome and proteome pr<strong>of</strong>iling) in<br />

different models to finally achieve a complete picture <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>host</strong>-<strong>pathogen</strong><br />

<strong>interactions</strong>.<br />

Such different models include e. g. other epithelial cell lines, like the S9 cells used in this study,<br />

but can also be extended to immune cells. Such a study was performed <strong>by</strong> Voyich and colleagues<br />

in 2005. The authors analyzed the gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> different S. aureus strains upon<br />

phagocytosis <strong>by</strong> human neutrophils (Voyich et al. 2005). Again, several experimental parameters<br />

differed between the studies <strong>of</strong> Voyich and colleagues (2005), Garzoni and colleagues (2007), and<br />

this study, partly resulting from the very different <strong>host</strong> cell type employed <strong>by</strong> Voyich and<br />

coworkers. The authors described immune evasion mechanisms <strong>of</strong> S. aureus, which are initiated<br />

<strong>by</strong> transcriptional changes. First, the authors observed induction <strong>of</strong> stress response genes, e. g.<br />

superoxide dismutases sodA and sodM and several other genes involved in counteracting the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> reactive oxygen intermediates. An as strong response was not observed in this study,<br />

which can be explained <strong>by</strong> the innate function <strong>of</strong> neutrophils to kill <strong>pathogen</strong>s, which is not given<br />

for epithelial cells. Thus, staphylococci internalized in S9 cells probably encounter less harmful<br />

molecules than staphylococci after uptake <strong>by</strong> neutrophils. The induction <strong>of</strong> TCA cycle genes after<br />

phagocytosis <strong>by</strong> neutrophils (Voyich et al. 2005) corresponds with results from this study using S9<br />

cells. Voyich and coworkers observed repression <strong>of</strong> genes involved in cell envelope synthesis, cell<br />

division, and replication, which was not as obvious in S9 cell internalized staphylococci.<br />

Nevertheless, cell wall remodeling processes were concluded from gene expression data (this<br />

study). Furthermore, staphylococci in neutrophils induced several toxins and adhesins (Voyich et<br />

al. 2005), <strong>of</strong> which some were also observed after S9 cell internalization, e. g. hlgB, hlgC, lukD,<br />

lukE; fnbB, coa, clfA (this study). The toxin gene induction appeared to be stronger in the<br />

neutrophil than in the S9 study, although hla was induced after internalization in S9 cells and not<br />

after phagocytosis <strong>by</strong> neutrophils. Anyway, the different staphylococcal strains, which were used<br />

in the studies, contribute considerably to the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the gene expression signature<br />

(Voyich et al. 2005). In the neutrophil phagocytosis dependent gene expression pattern,<br />

differential expression <strong>of</strong> regulatory genes was reported (Voyich et al. 2005). These included<br />

increased expression <strong>of</strong> vraRS, saeRS, and sarA. While induction or a trend <strong>of</strong> induction <strong>of</strong> saeRS<br />

and vraRS was also visible in this study, sarA was not differentially expressed when staphylococci<br />

were internalized in S9 cells. Furthermore, repression <strong>of</strong> agr or sigB was not observed in this<br />

study, but in the study <strong>of</strong> Voyich and coworkers.<br />

In total, after comparison <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> Voyich and colleagues (2005), Garzoni and<br />

colleagues (2007), and this study, it becomes clear that similarities in certain aspects do not<br />

necessarily lead to completely consistent results. This probably depends to a large extent on the<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>host</strong> cell and bacterial strain, but also on further experimental conditions which<br />

varied strongly between the studies. Nevertheless, parts <strong>of</strong> the results were also found in other<br />

studies. Since an admittedly slightly imprecise attempt to specify real internalization specific gene<br />

expression that did not occur in control samples revealed virulence associated genes in the study<br />

described in this thesis, the recorded gene expression pattern is probably physiologically<br />

relevant. Therefore, the gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling turned out to be an important basic study<br />

which will entail follow-up experiments like studies <strong>of</strong> bacterial mutants, comparison <strong>of</strong> different<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!