28.12.2013 Views

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Maren Depke<br />

Discussion and Conclusions<br />

Similarly, the expression <strong>of</strong> extracellular and membrane-bound enzymes, which contribute to<br />

virulence or spreading, was difficult to interpret. Expression <strong>of</strong> serine proteases (splABCDEF) and<br />

lipase (lip) was increased, whereas the expression <strong>of</strong> hyaluronate lyase (hysA), a membrane<br />

bound serine protease (htrA), nuclease (nuc), and glutamyl endopeptidase alias V8 peptidase<br />

(sspA) was repressed in internalized staphylococci. Some spl genes were found to be SaeRSregulated<br />

(Rogasch et al. 2006). Thus, the induction <strong>of</strong> the spl operon fits to the proposed activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SaeRS two-component system.<br />

Gene expression changes which might have influence on cell wall remodeling were also<br />

observed in internalized staphylococci. Surprisingly, this included repression <strong>of</strong> the dlt operon.<br />

The proteins encoded <strong>by</strong> dlt participate in incorporation and esterification <strong>of</strong> D-alanine residues<br />

into the cell wall teichoic acids. In this way, the negative charge <strong>of</strong> the cell wall structures is<br />

reduced and thus is less attractant for positively charged antimicrobial molecules (Peschel et al.<br />

1999). With the aim to evade the immune response, an induction <strong>of</strong> dlt expression had been<br />

expected. In parallel, the induction <strong>of</strong> peptidoglycan hydrolase lytM and staphylococcal secretory<br />

antigen ssaA was recorded (this study), which are also involved in cell wall remodeling (Dubrac et<br />

al. 2007). Repression <strong>of</strong> dlt and induction <strong>of</strong> lytM were also observed <strong>by</strong> Garzoni and coworkers<br />

(Garzoni et al. 2007). Furthermore, the induction <strong>of</strong> prsA, coding for a foldase involved in<br />

translocation and folding <strong>of</strong> secreted proteins (Sarvas et al. 2004), was observed in internalized<br />

staphylococci 2.5 h after infection <strong>of</strong> S9 cells (this study). This regulation was in accordance with<br />

protein abundance data in internalized staphylococci which were determined <strong>by</strong> Sandra Scharf<br />

(Schmidt et al. 2010). She also found an increased abundance <strong>of</strong> VraR, regulatory component <strong>of</strong><br />

the VraRS two-component system and known to be positively auto-regulated (Kuroda et al.<br />

2003), which led to the examination <strong>of</strong> vraRS gene expression: vraR (1.8) and vraS (1.6) were not<br />

significantly different in internalized staphylococci (2.5 h) in comparison to control, but the fold<br />

change values indicated a slight trend for induction. Hence, the observed differential expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> cell wall remodeling related genes was in agreement with the proteome data <strong>of</strong> Sandra Scharf.<br />

Additionally, genes described to belong to the VraRS regulon (Kuroda et al. 2003) were examined.<br />

Internalized staphylococci induced about 20 % <strong>of</strong> the published VraRS regulon (Kuroda et al.<br />

2003) at the same time point when a trend <strong>of</strong> vraRS induction was detected. Since the VraRS<br />

two-component system was suggested to be activated upon cell wall damage or inhibition <strong>of</strong> cell<br />

wall biosynthesis (Kuroda et al. 2000, Kuroda et al. 2003), the observation <strong>of</strong> cell wall remodeling<br />

associated gene expression changes might indicate a reaction to stressful influences which<br />

possibly operate on the bacterial cell wall after internalization into the <strong>host</strong> cell. Another possible<br />

explanation proposed <strong>by</strong> Garzoni and colleagues (2007) is that the gene induction (e. g. lytM) is<br />

associated with cell division processes.<br />

The gene expression analysis <strong>of</strong> internalized staphylococci in S9 cells led to the recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

changes in the expression <strong>of</strong> metabolic genes. Purine biosynthesis, tRNA synthetases, and<br />

glycolysis were repressed, whereas gluconeogenesis, TCA cycle enzyme genes, and especially<br />

genes related to amino acid biosynthesis were induced. The induction <strong>of</strong> amino acid biosynthesis<br />

and TCA cycle genes as well as the repression <strong>of</strong> purine biosynthesis and tRNA synthetase genes<br />

was clearly confirmed in the proteome analysis <strong>of</strong> Sandra Scharf. Additionally, transporter genes<br />

were differentially expressed. Induction was observed especially for phosphate transporters, but<br />

also for transporters <strong>of</strong> phosphonate, methionine, peptide/oligopeptide, sugar/maltose,<br />

osmoprotectants, amino acids, and gluconate. Repression was detected for urea,<br />

202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!