genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ... genomewide characterization of host-pathogen interactions by ...

ub.ed.ub.uni.greifswald.de
from ub.ed.ub.uni.greifswald.de More from this publisher
28.12.2013 Views

Maren Depke Results Gene Expression Pattern of Bone-Marrow Derived Macrophages after Interferon-gamma Treatment endoperoxide synthase 2 (Ptgs2), coding for the enzyme responsible for prostaglandin E 2 biosynthesis, was induced as well as different 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase genes (Oas2, Oas3, Oasl1, Oasl2). They are part of the innate immune response. Serum amyloid proteins are part of the acute phase response. In humans, Saa genes are known to be expressed not only in the liver, but also in activated monocytes/macrophages (Urieli-Shoval et al. 1994). In this study, serum amyloid A 3 (Saa3) was induced in murine BMM after IFN-γ treatment. BMM induced plasma membrane receptors after treatment with IFN-γ. Among others, the induction of IgG Fc receptor with high affinity I and with low affinity IV (Fcgr1 and Fcgr4), of tolllike receptors 2, 9, and 12 (Tlr2, Tlr9, Tlr12), and of co-stimulatory receptors Cd40 and Cd86 was observed. Additionally, CD274 (B7-H1, PD-L1), ligand for the immunoinhibitory receptor PD-1 on activated B and T cells, and the second PD-1 receptor, programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (Pdcd1lg2; PD-L2) exhibited induction (Table R.3.8). Table R.3.8: IFN-γ influence on expression of immune function related genes in BMM of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Rosetta Resolver Annotation fold change a strain difference gene Entrez description alias name Gene ID BALB/c C57BL/6 control IFN-γ Nos2 nitric oxide synthase 2, inducible iNOS,Nos2a 18126 18.6 25.5 Kynu kynureninase (L-kynurenine hydrolase) 70789 4.0 5.2 Wars tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase WRS 22375 3.7 4.4 Ptgs2 prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 COX2, PHS-2, Pghs2, TIS10, PGHS-2 19225 16.2 15.4 Oas2 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase 2 Oasl11 246728 2.3 2.4 x Oas3 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase 3 Oasl10 246727 3.0 4.4 Oasl1 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase-like 1 oasl9 231655 4.8 2.4 x x Oasl2 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase-like 2 Oasl, M1204, Mmu- OASL 23962 2.6 4.2 Saa3 serum amyloid A 3 l7R3, Saa-3 20210 3.8 5.7 Fcgr1 Fc receptor, IgG, high affinity I CD64, IGGHAFC, FcgammaRI 14129 4.6 4.9 x Fcgr4 Fc receptor, IgG, low affinity IV Fcrl3, CD16-2, FcgRIV, Fcgr3a, FcgammaRIV 246256 6.0 3.9 Tlr2 toll-like receptor 2 Ly105 24088 2.0 1.5 Tlr9 toll-like receptor 9 81897 2.8 2.3 Tlr12 toll-like receptor 12 Gm1365 384059 1.8 2.8 Cd40 CD40 antigen IGM, p50, Bp50, GP39, IMD3, TRAP, HIGM1, T- 21939 5.1 2.6 x BAM, Tnfrsf5 Cd86 CD86 antigen B7, B70, MB7, B7-2, B7.2, CLS1, Ly58, ETC-1, Ly-58, MB7-2, Cd28l2, 12524 6.5 5.4 TS/A-2 Cd274 CD274 antigen B7-H1, PD-L1, Pdcd1l1, Pdcd1lg1 60533 4.0 3.0 Pdcd1lg2 programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 Btdc, B7-DC, PD-L2 58205 5.5 8.6 a Fold change values were calculated from expression intensities of IFN-γ treated BMM in comparison to control BMM from the mean of three biological replicates. Differential expression in statistical testing with p* < 0.01 and a minimal absolute fold change of 1.5 is indicated in bold. Finally, the expression of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase 2 (Sod2) and glutaredoxin (Glrx), which are involved in the anti-oxidant defense, was induced. Contrarily, glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (Gstm1), which is associated to detoxification processes, was repressed. Furthermore, the induction of lysosomal enzymes cathepsin C and H (Ctsc, Ctsh) was observed. BMM induced cell adhesion molecules, integrins, and protocadherin (Icam1, Itgal, Itgb7, Pcdh7, Vcam1) after IFN-γ treatment, whereas they repressed the beta-integrin subunit Itgb3 (Table R.3.9). 102

Maren Depke Results Gene Expression Pattern of Bone-Marrow Derived Macrophages after Interferon-gamma Treatment Table R.3.9: IFN-γ influence on gene expression of anti-oxidant, detoxification, and lysosomal enzymes and of adhesion molecules in BMM of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Rosetta Resolver Annotation fold change a strain difference gene Entrez description alias name Gene ID BALB/c C57BL/6 control IFN-γ Sod2 superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial MnSOD 20656 2.1 2.2 Glrx glutaredoxin Grx1, Glrx1, Ttase 93692 2.0 2.2 Gstm1 glutathione S-transferase, mu 1 Gstb1, Gstb-1 14862 -1.9 -1.9 Ctsc cathepsin C DPP1, DPPI 13032 4.0 4.5 x Ctsh cathepsin H Ctsh 13036 2.2 1.6 x x Icam1 intercellular adhesion molecule 1 CD54, Ly-47, Icam-1, MALA-2 15894 2.3 2.2 Itgal integrin alpha L Cd11a, LFA-1, Ly-15, Ly-21 16408 2.8 2.0 x Itgb3 integrin beta 3 CD61, GP3A, INGRB3 16416 -2.3 -2.9 Itgb7 integrin beta 7 Ly69 16421 2.5 2.1 Pcdh7 protocadherin 7 54216 1.7 1.7 x Vcam1 vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 CD106, Vcam-1 22329 3.1 1.7 a Fold change values were calculated from expression intensities of IFN-γ treated BMM in comparison to control BMM from the mean of three biological replicates. Differential expression in statistical testing with p* < 0.01 and a minimal absolute fold change of 1.5 is indicated in bold. Biological context of gene expression differences between BALB/c BMM and C57BL/6 BMM Comparison of differentially expressed gene lists (Fig. R.3.3 A) and comparison of log 2 -ratio data (Fig. R.3.3 B) revealed highly similar strain differences between BALB/c and C57BL/6 BMM at both treatment levels, non-treated medium control and after IFN-γ treatment, even for genes which were differentially expressed only in one of the two comparisons. Therefore, the biological context of strain differences was further analyzed using the union set of differences at control level and after IFN-γ treatment. First, the list of in total 324 genes, which exhibited differences between the strains in at least one of the two treatment conditions, was subjected to a global functional analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, www.ingenuity.com), which compared functional categories within the data set with those of the complete array and assigned a p-value to rate on significant overrepresentation (Table R.3.10). This analysis revealed on the one hand categories with immune response related functions like “Inflammatory Response”, “Antigen Presentation”, and “Immune Cell Trafficking”, which was not surprising because the gene expression repertoire of BMM independent from the strain of which the cells were derived is focused at the immune response as the proprietary function of the BMM. Metabolic functions and the category “Cell Death” additionally appeared in the analysis of strain differences. Also for the strain difference aspect of this study, IPA’s canonical pathway analysis was applied for a more detailed view (Table R.3.11). Here, the pathway “Complement System” appeared with the highest ratio value. Four genes differentially expressed between the strains were included in this pathway. Noticeably, the ratio values for this and further pathways were lower than in the analysis of IFN-γ effects on BMM. This might reflect the smaller number of genes exhibiting differences between the strains in comparison to the number of genes which are influenced by IFN-γ, but also the possibility that the strain differences are more distributed among the pathways and functions. 103

Maren Depke<br />

Results<br />

Gene Expression Pattern <strong>of</strong> Bone-Marrow Derived Macrophages after Interferon-gamma Treatment<br />

endoperoxide synthase 2 (Ptgs2), coding for the enzyme responsible for prostaglandin E 2<br />

biosynthesis, was induced as well as different 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase genes (Oas2, Oas3,<br />

Oasl1, Oasl2). They are part <strong>of</strong> the innate immune response. Serum amyloid proteins are part <strong>of</strong><br />

the acute phase response. In humans, Saa genes are known to be expressed not only in the liver,<br />

but also in activated monocytes/macrophages (Urieli-Shoval et al. 1994). In this study, serum<br />

amyloid A 3 (Saa3) was induced in murine BMM after IFN-γ treatment.<br />

BMM induced plasma membrane receptors after treatment with IFN-γ. Among others, the<br />

induction <strong>of</strong> IgG Fc receptor with high affinity I and with low affinity IV (Fcgr1 and Fcgr4), <strong>of</strong> tolllike<br />

receptors 2, 9, and 12 (Tlr2, Tlr9, Tlr12), and <strong>of</strong> co-stimulatory receptors Cd40 and Cd86 was<br />

observed. Additionally, CD274 (B7-H1, PD-L1), ligand for the immunoinhibitory receptor PD-1 on<br />

activated B and T cells, and the second PD-1 receptor, programmed cell death 1 ligand 2<br />

(Pdcd1lg2; PD-L2) exhibited induction (Table R.3.8).<br />

Table R.3.8: IFN-γ influence on expression <strong>of</strong> immune function related genes in BMM <strong>of</strong> BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice.<br />

Rosetta Resolver Annotation fold change a strain<br />

difference<br />

gene<br />

Entrez<br />

description<br />

alias<br />

name<br />

Gene ID<br />

BALB/c C57BL/6 control IFN-γ<br />

Nos2 nitric oxide synthase 2, inducible iNOS,Nos2a 18126 18.6 25.5<br />

Kynu kynureninase (L-kynurenine hydrolase) 70789 4.0 5.2<br />

Wars tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase WRS 22375 3.7 4.4<br />

Ptgs2 prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2<br />

COX2, PHS-2, Pghs2,<br />

TIS10, PGHS-2<br />

19225 16.2 15.4<br />

Oas2 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase 2 Oasl11 246728 2.3 2.4 x<br />

Oas3 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase 3 Oasl10 246727 3.0 4.4<br />

Oasl1 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase-like 1 oasl9 231655 4.8 2.4 x x<br />

Oasl2 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase-like 2<br />

Oasl, M1204, Mmu-<br />

OASL<br />

23962 2.6 4.2<br />

Saa3 serum amyloid A 3 l7R3, Saa-3 20210 3.8 5.7<br />

Fcgr1 Fc receptor, IgG, high affinity I<br />

CD64, IGGHAFC,<br />

FcgammaRI<br />

14129 4.6 4.9 x<br />

Fcgr4 Fc receptor, IgG, low affinity IV<br />

Fcrl3, CD16-2, FcgRIV,<br />

Fcgr3a, FcgammaRIV<br />

246256 6.0 3.9<br />

Tlr2 toll-like receptor 2 Ly105 24088 2.0 1.5<br />

Tlr9 toll-like receptor 9 81897 2.8 2.3<br />

Tlr12 toll-like receptor 12 Gm1365 384059 1.8 2.8<br />

Cd40 CD40 antigen<br />

IGM, p50, Bp50, GP39,<br />

IMD3, TRAP, HIGM1, T- 21939 5.1 2.6 x<br />

BAM, Tnfrsf5<br />

Cd86 CD86 antigen<br />

B7, B70, MB7, B7-2,<br />

B7.2, CLS1, Ly58, ETC-1,<br />

Ly-58, MB7-2, Cd28l2,<br />

12524 6.5 5.4<br />

TS/A-2<br />

Cd274 CD274 antigen<br />

B7-H1, PD-L1, Pdcd1l1,<br />

Pdcd1lg1<br />

60533 4.0 3.0<br />

Pdcd1lg2 programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 Btdc, B7-DC, PD-L2 58205 5.5 8.6<br />

a Fold change values were calculated from expression intensities <strong>of</strong> IFN-γ treated BMM in comparison to control BMM from the mean<br />

<strong>of</strong> three biological replicates. Differential expression in statistical testing with p* < 0.01 and a minimal absolute fold change <strong>of</strong> 1.5 is<br />

indicated in bold.<br />

Finally, the expression <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial superoxide dismutase 2 (Sod2) and glutaredoxin<br />

(Glrx), which are involved in the anti-oxidant defense, was induced. Contrarily, glutathione<br />

S-transferase mu 1 (Gstm1), which is associated to detoxification processes, was repressed.<br />

Furthermore, the induction <strong>of</strong> lysosomal enzymes cathepsin C and H (Ctsc, Ctsh) was observed.<br />

BMM induced cell adhesion molecules, integrins, and protocadherin (Icam1, Itgal, Itgb7, Pcdh7,<br />

Vcam1) after IFN-γ treatment, whereas they repressed the beta-integrin subunit Itgb3<br />

(Table R.3.9).<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!