27.12.2013 Views

Etudes et évaluation de processus océaniques par des hiérarchies ...

Etudes et évaluation de processus océaniques par des hiérarchies ...

Etudes et évaluation de processus océaniques par des hiérarchies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.6. ESTIMATION OF FRICTION PARAMETERS AND LAWS IN 1.5D SHALLOW-WATER GRAVI<br />

Ocean Dynamics<br />

tel-00545911, version 1 - 13 Dec 2010<br />

information can travel to the next assimilation point<br />

1 km away, but it cannot reach over the distance of two<br />

assimilation grid points. In b<strong>et</strong>ween assimilation points,<br />

h is interpolated linearly.<br />

In general, the observed value of the vertical extension<br />

of the gravity current h obs (x, t) inclu<strong>de</strong>s measurement<br />

errors η(x, t) and is related to the true value<br />

by h obs (x, t) = h true (x, t) + η(x, t). For consistency, the<br />

measurement error η(x, t) has the same first- (zero<br />

mean) and second-or<strong>de</strong>r moments (˜σ 2 ) as the noise<br />

vectors ǫ i (x, t), but it does not <strong>de</strong>pend on the actual<br />

realisation, that is, i. When assimilating data, σ has to be<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>d prior to the experiment, whereas ˜σ is usually<br />

not known and can only be estimated.<br />

In our <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>er estimation experiments, the ensemble<br />

size is m = 100; this is much larger than the<br />

number of <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers to estimate, that is, two, equal<br />

to the number of observations at each assimilation<br />

time, but smaller than the dimension of the augmented<br />

state vector x = (h, u, v, τ, c D ), that is, 302. Using an<br />

ensemble size an or<strong>de</strong>r of magnitu<strong>de</strong> larger did not<br />

improve the convergence significantly, reducing the ensemble<br />

size an or<strong>de</strong>r of magnitu<strong>de</strong> leads to a frequent<br />

divergence of the assimilation.<br />

Another important point is that the <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>er values<br />

are s<strong>et</strong> to be constant in time. This allows us to iterate<br />

our estimation experiment, that is, once we performed<br />

an entire estimation run, we could take the analysed<br />

values of the <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers after the last assimilation and<br />

use them for the first guess of a new experiment, iterating,<br />

thus, the same gravity current dynamics several<br />

times, always keeping the same data.<br />

The values of the friction <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers are clearly<br />

non-negative, so every time the assimilation scheme<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>s a negative value of one of these <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers,<br />

which is possible due to the linearity of the analysis step<br />

and the statistical nature of the EnKF, the value is put<br />

to zero.<br />

4 Twin experiments<br />

The goal of our data assimilation experiment is to<br />

d<strong>et</strong>ermine the friction law acting on the gravity extension<br />

(h) of the gravity current. The vertical extension,<br />

that is, the <strong>de</strong>nsity structure of a gravity current, is<br />

the variable that is easiest to measure and observe in<br />

the ocean and in laboratory experiments. In our twin<br />

experiments, the data from observations or laboratory<br />

experiments are replaced by data from a control run<br />

(dynamics not subject to data assimilation) using the<br />

same numerical mo<strong>de</strong>l as in the data assimilation experiments<br />

(see Section 2). In some experiments, the<br />

initial conditions in the control runs differ from those<br />

of the assimilation runs. In Fig. 2, the vertical extension<br />

is shown for the control runs of three different s<strong>et</strong>s of<br />

the friction <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers. The differences in the shapes of<br />

these curves are a prerequisite for the possible success<br />

of our experiments. It is a time series of these shapes,<br />

and only these, which is provi<strong>de</strong>d to the assimilation<br />

run and which has to d<strong>et</strong>ermine the friction <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers<br />

on their basis. The observed variables must be sensitive<br />

to the <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers to be controlled. By performing<br />

twin experiments, we thus evaluate the feasibility of the<br />

data assimilation strategy by assimilating data that were<br />

produced by the very same mo<strong>de</strong>l that is used for the assimilation<br />

experiment with the actual <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>er values<br />

fixed. We thus explore the prerequisites un<strong>de</strong>r which<br />

the <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>er estimation scheme is able to come up<br />

with the right s<strong>et</strong> of <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers un<strong>de</strong>r these favourable<br />

conditions.<br />

To explore the feasibility of the <strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>er estimation,<br />

we performed a series of experiments, which are<br />

summarised in Table 1, where σ gives the standard<br />

<strong>de</strong>viation of the noise ad<strong>de</strong>d to the “observation” of<br />

the vertical extension of the layer. When the perturbed<br />

layer thickness is smaller than 10 −6 m, it is put to<br />

10 −6 m. The initial distribution of the ensemble of<br />

<strong>par</strong>am<strong>et</strong>ers (τ i , c i D ) i=1,...,100 has a normal distribution,<br />

with a mean of (8. · 10 −3 , 7. · 10 −4 ) and a standard variation<br />

of (5. · 10 −3 , 3.5 · 10 −4 ). Please note that the initial<br />

ensemble has a mean that is significantly different from<br />

the true values (τ 0 , c D0 ) (values used in the control<br />

run). The evaluation of the assimilation procedure is<br />

based on the convergence of the ensemble mean to the<br />

true values tog<strong>et</strong>her with the <strong>de</strong>crease of the ensemble<br />

dispersion.<br />

All pseudo-random numbers were generated by a<br />

“Mersenne Twister” (Matsumoto and Nishimura 1998).<br />

Other experiments, not shown here, with different<br />

mean values and standard <strong>de</strong>viations of the initial dis-<br />

Fig. 2 Vertical extension of the gravity current (control runs) for<br />

experiments G0001 (blue), G0011 (red) and G0021 (green). At<br />

t = 0 (all curves superpose on black line), at t = 96 h, shapes in<br />

the three experiments are different

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!