Etudes et évaluation de processus océaniques par des hiérarchies ...
Etudes et évaluation de processus océaniques par des hiérarchies ... Etudes et évaluation de processus océaniques par des hiérarchies ...
94 CHAPITRE 4. ETUDES DE PROCESSUS OCÉANOGRAPHIQUES A. Wirth, B. Barnier / Ocean Modelling 12 (2006) 101–111 103 and rotation are aligned, presents the ‘‘traditional’’ convection case. Most Ocean General Circulation Models (OGCMS) use the traditional approximation. While preparing this manuscript the work by Sheremet (2004) was brought to our attention which clearly demonstrates the influence of a finite angle between the buoyancy and the axis of rotation in laboratory experiments. These pioneering laboratory experiments by Sheremet determine not only the influence of the axis of rotation on the direction of convection but also present a theoretical discussion of the phenomena. Our here presented work can indeed be seen as the numerical supplement to the laboratory experiments of Sheremet (2004), which present a fortuitous possibility to validate our calculations. To determine the influence of a finite angle between the axis of rotation and the direction of gravity we, however, performed calculations for four different angles. Following the work by Sheremet (2004) we also use the term ‘‘tilted’’ to describe the convection in instances where the axis and rotation and the buoyancy force are not colinear. 2. Model description tel-00545911, version 1 - 13 Dec 2010 The mathematical model of the here presented ocean convection experiment are the Boussinesq equations (Eq. (1)) of an incompressible flow (Eq. (2)) in a rotating frame, supplemented by boundary conditions. The flow field is given by u and the scalar (temperature) field by T. The buoyant scalar is transported by the flow (3). The source term S insures the prescribed heat fluxes through the upper boundary and the equation of state is linear with the expansion coefficient a. The ocean surface is modeled by a free-slip rigid-lid boundary condition, while the ocean floor is modeled by a no-slip boundary condition. In the horizontal directions periodic boundary conditions are employed. o t u þ u ru þ 2X u þ rP ¼ agT e ? þ mr 2 u r u ¼ 0 o t T þ u rT ¼ jr 2 T þ S The mathematical model is solved numerically using a pseudo-spectral scheme entirely based on Fourier expansion. The boundary conditions are implemented using a technique inspired by the immersed boundary condition (see Peskin, 1977; Goldstein et al., 1993). For a detailed discussion on the model and the new boundary technique we refer the reader to Wirth (2004). Our model will forth–worth be called HARmonic Ocean MODel (HAROMOD). The coherent structures dominating the convective dynamics are known to have comparable horizontal and vertical scales. A fact that has to be reflected in the aspect ratio of the numerical grid, which is unity in all the calculations presented here. We also choose the friction coefficients equal in the horizontal and vertical direction and the Prandtl number is unity (j = m) in all calculations. The area of integration spans 2 km · 2 km in the horizontal directions and 3 km in the vertical. The friction coefficients are, m = j = 0.1 m 2 /s the expansion coefficient a = 2.0 · 10 4 K 1 , gravity is g = 9.81 m/s 2 , density q = 1000 kg/m 3 and the specific heat capacity c = 3900 J/(kg K). The temperature in the upper 40 m is perfectly mixed, that is, the temperature is homogenized in this ð1Þ ð2Þ ð3Þ
4.4. TILTED CONVECTIVE PLUMES IN NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS 95 104 A. Wirth, B. Barnier / Ocean Modelling 12 (2006) 101–111 layer at every time-step. The ocean is cooled in a circular region attached to the surface, using a Gaussian profile given by ! H ¼ 1.28 W m exp x 2 þ y 2 z 2 ð4Þ 3 ð200mÞ 2 ð70mÞ 2 leading to a surface heat flux of ! H s ¼ 80 W m exp x 2 þ y 2 2 ð200mÞ 2 The total heating is thus P ¼ R R 3HdV ¼ 1.0 107 W and the buoyancy flux is F 0 ¼ ðPagÞ= ðcqÞ ¼ 5.03 10 3 m 4 =s 3 . The source term in Eq. (3) is given by S ¼ H=ðcqÞ The numerical resolution in the horizontal is 128 · 128 grid points, there are 192 grid points in the vertical direction and the time-step is Dt = 60 s. ð5Þ tel-00545911, version 1 - 13 Dec 2010 3. Tilted plumes The surface heat flux of 80 W/m 2 is smaller than the maximum values of heat exchange during specific convection events in the Labrador Sea, Greenland Sea and the Mediterranean (Marshall and Schott, 1999). We express the non-alignment of rotation and gravity by giving the latitude h of the corresponding situation, that is: h = 90° N for an alignment of rotation and gravity on the North Pole (NP), h = 60° N for the situation in the Labrador Sea (LS), h = 45° N for the situation in the Golf of Lions (GL) and h = 0° for the situation at the equator (EQ) (rotation being perpendicular to gravity). We are aware of the fact that there is no deep convection at the equator but included the case for completeness of the dynamical picture. We also performed calculations for the case with vanishing rotation (NR) in this case the horizontal expansion of the plume is not arrested, as it is in the rotating case. One-and-a-half days after the onset of cooling the NRplumeÕs horizontal extension is such that the plume dynamics is strongly influenced by the finite (periodic) domain size (Fig. 1(a)). In the cases with rotation, the horizontal expansion of the plume is arrested and it only spans a fraction of the horizontal domain size. The most conspicuous feature in tilted convection is that the plumes extend in the direction of the axis of rotation rather than gravity (see Fig. 1). This finding, which has been explored by Sheremet (2004) in laboratory experiments for the oceanic context, is well known to researches considering convection in rotating spheres (see e.g. Busse et al., 1998). The elongation of dynamical structures along the axis of rotation is attributed to the Taylor–Proudman theorem, which states that, in flows dominated by rotation the velocity vector is constant along the axis of rotation. For the first 5–8 h of the convection experiment the influence of rotation is not visible and all experiments look identical during this time the plume has dropped by about 500 m, being in perfect agreement with the scaling in time t 1 = 2.4/X and distance h c1 = 3.3(F 0 /X 3 ) 1/4 proposed by Fernando et al. (1998) (based on laboratory experiments). After that period the plume starts
- Page 49 and 50: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 51 and 52: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 53 and 54: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 55 and 56: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 57 and 58: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 59 and 60: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 61 and 62: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 63 and 64: 4.1. VARIABILITY OF THE GREAT WHIRL
- Page 65 and 66: 4.2. THE PARAMETRIZATION OF BAROCLI
- Page 67 and 68: 4.2. THE PARAMETRIZATION OF BAROCLI
- Page 69 and 70: 4.2. THE PARAMETRIZATION OF BAROCLI
- Page 71 and 72: 4.2. THE PARAMETRIZATION OF BAROCLI
- Page 73 and 74: 4.2. THE PARAMETRIZATION OF BAROCLI
- Page 75 and 76: 4.2. THE PARAMETRIZATION OF BAROCLI
- Page 77 and 78: 4.2. THE PARAMETRIZATION OF BAROCLI
- Page 79 and 80: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 81 and 82: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 83 and 84: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 85 and 86: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 87 and 88: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 89 and 90: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 91 and 92: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 93 and 94: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 95 and 96: 4.3. A NON-HYDROSTATIC FLAT-BOTTOM
- Page 97 and 98: 4.4. TILTED CONVECTIVE PLUMES IN NU
- Page 99: 4.4. TILTED CONVECTIVE PLUMES IN NU
- Page 103 and 104: 4.4. TILTED CONVECTIVE PLUMES IN NU
- Page 105 and 106: 4.4. TILTED CONVECTIVE PLUMES IN NU
- Page 107 and 108: 4.4. TILTED CONVECTIVE PLUMES IN NU
- Page 109 and 110: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 111 and 112: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 113 and 114: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 115 and 116: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 117 and 118: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 119 and 120: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 121 and 122: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 123 and 124: 4.5. MEAN CIRCULATION AND STRUCTURE
- Page 125 and 126: 4.6. ESTIMATION OF FRICTION PARAMET
- Page 127 and 128: 4.6. ESTIMATION OF FRICTION PARAMET
- Page 129 and 130: 4.6. ESTIMATION OF FRICTION PARAMET
- Page 131 and 132: 4.6. ESTIMATION OF FRICTION PARAMET
- Page 133 and 134: 4.6. ESTIMATION OF FRICTION PARAMET
- Page 135 and 136: 4.6. ESTIMATION OF FRICTION PARAMET
- Page 137 and 138: 4.7. ON THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF OCEA
- Page 139 and 140: 4.7. ON THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF OCEA
- Page 141 and 142: 4.7. ON THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF OCEA
- Page 143 and 144: 4.7. ON THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF OCEA
- Page 145 and 146: 4.7. ON THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF OCEA
- Page 147 and 148: 4.7. ON THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF OCEA
- Page 149 and 150: 4.7. ON THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF OCEA
94 CHAPITRE 4. ETUDES DE PROCESSUS OCÉANOGRAPHIQUES<br />
A. Wirth, B. Barnier / Ocean Mo<strong>de</strong>lling 12 (2006) 101–111 103<br />
and rotation are aligned, presents the ‘‘traditional’’ convection case. Most Ocean General Circulation<br />
Mo<strong>de</strong>ls (OGCMS) use the traditional approximation.<br />
While pre<strong>par</strong>ing this manuscript the work by Sherem<strong>et</strong> (2004) was brought to our attention<br />
which clearly <strong>de</strong>monstrates the influence of a finite angle b<strong>et</strong>ween the buoyancy and the axis of<br />
rotation in laboratory experiments. These pioneering laboratory experiments by Sherem<strong>et</strong> d<strong>et</strong>ermine<br />
not only the influence of the axis of rotation on the direction of convection but also present a<br />
theor<strong>et</strong>ical discussion of the phenomena. Our here presented work can in<strong>de</strong>ed be seen as the<br />
numerical supplement to the laboratory experiments of Sherem<strong>et</strong> (2004), which present a fortuitous<br />
possibility to validate our calculations. To d<strong>et</strong>ermine the influence of a finite angle b<strong>et</strong>ween<br />
the axis of rotation and the direction of gravity we, however, performed calculations for four<br />
different angles. Following the work by Sherem<strong>et</strong> (2004) we also use the term ‘‘tilted’’ to <strong>de</strong>scribe<br />
the convection in instances where the axis and rotation and the buoyancy force are not colinear.<br />
2. Mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>de</strong>scription<br />
tel-00545911, version 1 - 13 Dec 2010<br />
The mathematical mo<strong>de</strong>l of the here presented ocean convection experiment are the Boussinesq<br />
equations (Eq. (1)) of an incompressible flow (Eq. (2)) in a rotating frame, supplemented by<br />
boundary conditions. The flow field is given by u and the scalar (temperature) field by T. The<br />
buoyant scalar is transported by the flow (3). The source term S insures the prescribed heat fluxes<br />
through the upper boundary and the equation of state is linear with the expansion coefficient a.<br />
The ocean surface is mo<strong>de</strong>led by a free-slip rigid-lid boundary condition, while the ocean floor is<br />
mo<strong>de</strong>led by a no-slip boundary condition. In the horizontal directions periodic boundary conditions<br />
are employed.<br />
o t u þ u ru þ 2X u þ rP ¼ agT e ? þ mr 2 u<br />
r u ¼ 0<br />
o t T þ u rT ¼ jr 2 T þ S<br />
The mathematical mo<strong>de</strong>l is solved numerically using a pseudo-spectral scheme entirely based on<br />
Fourier expansion. The boundary conditions are implemented using a technique inspired by the<br />
immersed boundary condition (see Peskin, 1977; Goldstein <strong>et</strong> al., 1993). For a d<strong>et</strong>ailed discussion<br />
on the mo<strong>de</strong>l and the new boundary technique we refer the rea<strong>de</strong>r to Wirth (2004). Our mo<strong>de</strong>l will<br />
forth–worth be called HARmonic Ocean MODel (HAROMOD).<br />
The coherent structures dominating the convective dynamics are known to have com<strong>par</strong>able<br />
horizontal and vertical scales. A fact that has to be reflected in the aspect ratio of the numerical<br />
grid, which is unity in all the calculations presented here. We also choose the friction coefficients<br />
equal in the horizontal and vertical direction and the Prandtl number is unity (j = m) in all<br />
calculations.<br />
The area of integration spans 2 km · 2 km in the horizontal directions and 3 km in the vertical.<br />
The friction coefficients are, m = j = 0.1 m 2 /s the expansion coefficient a = 2.0 · 10 4 K 1 , gravity<br />
is g = 9.81 m/s 2 , <strong>de</strong>nsity q = 1000 kg/m 3 and the specific heat capacity c = 3900 J/(kg K). The<br />
temperature in the upper 40 m is perfectly mixed, that is, the temperature is homogenized in this<br />
ð1Þ<br />
ð2Þ<br />
ð3Þ