Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ... Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Chapter 3 These results show that the pressure has a definite effect on flammability limits of the syngas-air mixtures reducing the flammable region in the lean side. For hydrocarbon-air mixtures the rich limit become much wider with increasing pressure and the lean limit is not appreciably affected (Kuo, 2005). There is a dependence of the width of flammable region on the order of chemical reactions. The second order reactions that occur at low pressures give room to first order reactions at high pressures. To compare hydrocarbons flammability limits behavior with syngas higher pressure experiments are needed. 3.2.3 Pressure measurement on static chambers tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 A set of experiments were made in order to determine the repetition of the measured pressure versus time during the combustion of syngas-air mixtures. Figure 3.7 shows a set of three experiments with updraft syngas-air mixture in spherical chamber. Figure 3.8 shows a set of three experiments with updraft syngas-air mixture in rectangular chamber. In both cases the following initial conditions, P i = 1.0 bar, T i = 293 K and stoichiometric equivalence ratio where used. A very good repetition of the pressure signal was obtained in both cases. This behavior was verified for every syngas composition except for very lean mixtures. In those cases the number of experiments was increased to five, especially in the rectangular chamber due to higher leakages. 7 6 5 (1) (2) (3) Pressure (bar) 4 3 2 1 0 Shot 1 Shot 2 Shot 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (ms) Figure 3.7 - Pressure versus time in spherical chamber 71
Experimental set ups and diagnostics 7 6 5 (1) (2) (3) Pressure (bar) 4 3 2 1 0 Shot 1 Shot 2 Shot 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (ms) Figure 3.8 - Pressure versus time in rectangular chamber tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 Three combustion stages can be observed from the pressure versus time curves shown in the figures 3.7 and 3.8: (1) development of a flame kernel followed by flame propagation at constant pressure; (2) flame development followed by rapid pressure increase and (3) flame quenching followed by burned gases cooling. The first stage, that has a changeable duration in accordance with the initial conditions of the mixture, corresponds to the formation of the initial flame kernel. The ignition is provoked by a spark of duration of approximately 5 ms and allows inflaming the mixture creating a flame kernel that develops at sensibly constant pressure. During this phase, flame development could be difficult. In one hand, the reduced flame radius makes the curvature effect more significant. On the other hand, the electrodes can provoke the quenching of the flame due to heat absorption. In the second stage, a stable flame is established. It begins when the pressure starts to increase and ends when the pressure reaches its maximum value. Fisson et al. (1994), shown that a well established flame is obtained when the pressure reaches 1.5 times the initial pressure. At the end of this stage, the flame approaches the wall magnifying the heat losses, which can violate the hypothesis of adiabatic compression. For this reason, the maximum pressure P max is lower than the adiabatic pressure P v which would be obtained if the process were adiabatic throughout all this phase. The third and last phase represents the end of combustion, where the flame reaches the wall nonuniformly. On the double effect of the thermal losses and the deactivation of the free radicals, the flame is quenched followed by the burned gases cooling. 72
- Page 23 and 24: Bibliographic revision point today
- Page 25 and 26: Bibliographic revision - Boudouard
- Page 27 and 28: Bibliographic revision Table 2.1 -
- Page 29 and 30: Bibliographic revision Biomass Dryi
- Page 31 and 32: Bibliographic revision Circulating
- Page 33 and 34: Bibliographic revision or eliminate
- Page 35 and 36: Bibliographic revision established
- Page 37 and 38: Bibliographic revision Hydrogen Hyd
- Page 39 and 40: Bibliographic revision of low moist
- Page 41 and 42: Bibliographic revision scrubbing an
- Page 43 and 44: Bibliographic revision suggests tha
- Page 45 and 46: Bibliographic revision 1 d( δ A) 1
- Page 47 and 48: Bibliographic revision Since n is
- Page 49 and 50: Bibliographic revision 2 ( rsr ) 2
- Page 51 and 52: Bibliographic revision This evoluti
- Page 53 and 54: Bibliographic revision The burning
- Page 55 and 56: Bibliographic revision δVG = − a
- Page 57 and 58: Bibliographic revision 2 1 − −
- Page 59 and 60: Bibliographic revision where the su
- Page 61 and 62: Bibliographic revision the stretche
- Page 63 and 64: Bibliographic revision burning velo
- Page 65 and 66: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 67 and 68: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 69 and 70: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 71 and 72: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 73: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 77 and 78: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 79 and 80: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 81 and 82: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 83 and 84: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 85 and 86: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 87 and 88: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL AN
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 4 4.1 Laminar burning veloc
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4 4.1.1.1 Flame morphology
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 4 P i = 1.0 bar, Ti = 293 K
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 4 Figure 4.5 shows schliere
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 4 P i = 2.0 bar, T i = 293
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 4 Sn (m/s) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 4 5 ms 10 ms 15 ms 20 ms 25
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 4 behaviour of the curves r
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 4 1.50 Sn (m/s) 1.25 1.00 0
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 4 0.5 0.4 φ =1.0 Su (m/s)
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 4 variation of the normaliz
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 4 4.1.1.6 Comparison with o
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 4 The values of laminar bur
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Pressure (bar) 7 6 5 4 3
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 4 0.5 0.4 φ=1.2 Su (m/s) 0
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 4 0.3 φ=0.8 Su (m/s) 0.2 0
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 4 a minimum pressure to exp
Experimental set ups and diagnostics<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
(1) (2)<br />
(3)<br />
Pressure (bar)<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Shot 1<br />
Shot 2<br />
Shot 3<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
Time (ms)<br />
Figure 3.8 - Pressure versus time in rectangu<strong>la</strong>r chamber<br />
tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011<br />
Three <strong>combustion</strong> stages can be observed from the pressure versus time curves<br />
shown in the figures 3.7 and 3.8: (1) <strong>de</strong>velopment of a f<strong>la</strong>me kernel followed by f<strong>la</strong>me<br />
propagation at constant pressure; (2) f<strong>la</strong>me <strong>de</strong>velopment followed by rapid pressure<br />
increase and (3) f<strong>la</strong>me quenching followed by burned gases cooling.<br />
The first stage, that has a changeable duration in accordance with the initial conditions<br />
of the mixture, corresponds to the formation of the initial f<strong>la</strong>me kernel. The ignition is<br />
provoked by a spark of duration of approximately 5 ms and allows inf<strong>la</strong>ming the mixture<br />
creating a f<strong>la</strong>me kernel that <strong>de</strong>velops at sensibly constant pressure. During this phase,<br />
f<strong>la</strong>me <strong>de</strong>velopment could be difficult. In one hand, the reduced f<strong>la</strong>me radius makes the<br />
curvature effect more significant. On the other hand, the electro<strong>de</strong>s can provoke the<br />
quenching of the f<strong>la</strong>me due to heat absorption. In the second stage, a stable f<strong>la</strong>me is<br />
established. It begins when the pressure starts to increase and ends when the<br />
pressure reaches its maximum value. Fisson et al. (1994), shown that a well<br />
established f<strong>la</strong>me is obtained when the pressure reaches 1.5 times the initial pressure.<br />
At the end of this stage, the f<strong>la</strong>me approaches the wall magnifying the heat losses,<br />
which can vio<strong>la</strong>te the hypothesis of adiabatic compression. For this reason, the<br />
maximum pressure P max is lower than the adiabatic pressure P v which would be<br />
obtained if the process were adiabatic throughout all this phase. The third and <strong>la</strong>st<br />
phase represents the end of <strong>combustion</strong>, where the f<strong>la</strong>me reaches the wall nonuniformly.<br />
On the double effect of the thermal losses and the <strong>de</strong>activation of the free<br />
radicals, the f<strong>la</strong>me is quenched followed by the burned gases cooling.<br />
72