Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ... Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Chapter 2 with different characteristics were used, namely Herguido et al., (1992); Javier et al., (1997); Kim et al., (2001) and Rolando et al., (2002). It is expected that the rise of temperature leads to an increase in the rate of the several reactions that took place during gasification process, which, globally, produce hydrogen and carbon monoxide and eliminates hydrocarbons. At higher gasification temperatures lower solids and tar emissions are observed, which means that the produced gas may require a lower cost on gas cleaning processes. 2.3.3.2. Pressure Gasifiers can be operated at elevated pressures, the advantage being for those end use applications where the gas is required to be compressed afterwards, as in a gas turbine. tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 Pressurized gasifiers have the following significant features: - Feeding is more complex and very costly, and has a high inert gas requirement for purging. - Capital costs of pressure equipment are much higher than for atmospheric equipment, although equipment sizes are much smaller. - Pressurized gasification systems can cost up to four times as much as atmospheric systems at power outputs up to 20 MW e . This disadvantage is countered by the higher efficiency, and this effect becomes significant at 30-50 MW e , above which pressure systems are believed likely to be more economic than atmospheric systems. - Gas is supplied to the turbine at adequate pressure, removing the need for gas compression and also permitting relatively high tar contents in the gas; such tar needs to be completely burned in the turbine combustor. - Hot gas cleanup with mechanical filters (such as sintered metal or ceramic candles) is usually used, which reduces thermal and pressure energy losses and in principle in simpler and of lower cost than are scrubbing systems. - Overall system efficiency is higher owing to retention of sensible heat and chemical energy of tars in the product gas and the avoidance of a fuel gas compression stage ahead of the turbine. The only significant energy losses are to the environment and in provision of inert gas to the pressure feeders, and these can be as low as 5-8%, giving energy conversion efficiency for the gasifier itself of 92-95%. A corresponding atmospheric gasifier with water 37
Bibliographic revision scrubbing and product gas compression would have an analogous efficiency as low as 80-85%, depending on capacity and design. Atmospheric gasifiers have the following significant features: - For gas turbine applications the product gas is required to be sufficiently clean for compression before the turbine. Suggested specifications are given later. For engine applications the gas quality requirements are less onerous and pressure is not required. - Atmospheric systems have a potentially much lower capital cost at smaller capacities of below 30 MW e as discussed above. Gas compositions and heating values are not significantly different for either system (Bridgwater, 1995). tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 2.3.4 Influence of the oxidizer It is well-known that the heating value and the H 2 content of syngas are higher when gasification is made with steam than it is made with air (Javier et al., 1999). Table 2.7 shows experimental results of wood gasification using different types of oxidizers. Table 2.7 - Influence of the oxidizer in the final composition of syngas. Oxidizing agent Composition (% vol, dry base) HHV H (MJ/m 3 2 CO CO 2 CH 4 N 2 ) Reference Air (downdraft) 17 21 13 1 48 5.7 (Bridgwater, 1995) Air (updraft) 11 24 9 3 53 5.5 (Bridgwater, 1995) O 2 (downdraft) 32 48 15 2 3 10.4 (Bridgwater, 1995) Air (BFB) 9 14 20 7 50 5.4 (Bridgwater, 1995) Air (CFB) 14.1 18.7 14.7 3.5 47.7 n.d. (Mehrling et al. , 1989) Air (BFB) 9.5 18 13.5 4.5 45 n.d. (Narvaez, 1996) Steam (CFB) 34.2 27.2 22.7 11.1 4.8 n.d. ( Fercher et. al., 1998) Steam (BFB) 52 23 18 7 n.d. n.d. (Herguido et. al., 1992) It is verified that the use of steam or O 2 as oxidizer agent increases remarkably the production of H 2 and CO reflecting a significant increase of the syngas heat value. In the case of the fluidized bed reactors, an increase of the methane yields is also verified using steam as oxidizer. 38
- Page 1 and 2: THÈSE Pour l’obtention du Grade
- Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgements Acknowledgements T
- Page 5 and 6: Résumé __________________________
- Page 7 and 8: Nomenclature Nomenclature Roman tel
- Page 9 and 10: Nomenclature Subscripts tel-0062309
- Page 11 and 12: Contents tel-00623090, version 1 -
- Page 13 and 14: Contents 6.4. SYNGAS FUELLED-ENGINE
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
- Page 17 and 18: Introduction proves to have higher
- Page 19 and 20: Introduction Chapter 3 - Experiment
- Page 21 and 22: Bibliographic revision CHAPTER 2 BI
- Page 23 and 24: Bibliographic revision point today
- Page 25 and 26: Bibliographic revision - Boudouard
- Page 27 and 28: Bibliographic revision Table 2.1 -
- Page 29 and 30: Bibliographic revision Biomass Dryi
- Page 31 and 32: Bibliographic revision Circulating
- Page 33 and 34: Bibliographic revision or eliminate
- Page 35 and 36: Bibliographic revision established
- Page 37 and 38: Bibliographic revision Hydrogen Hyd
- Page 39: Bibliographic revision of low moist
- Page 43 and 44: Bibliographic revision suggests tha
- Page 45 and 46: Bibliographic revision 1 d( δ A) 1
- Page 47 and 48: Bibliographic revision Since n is
- Page 49 and 50: Bibliographic revision 2 ( rsr ) 2
- Page 51 and 52: Bibliographic revision This evoluti
- Page 53 and 54: Bibliographic revision The burning
- Page 55 and 56: Bibliographic revision δVG = − a
- Page 57 and 58: Bibliographic revision 2 1 − −
- Page 59 and 60: Bibliographic revision where the su
- Page 61 and 62: Bibliographic revision the stretche
- Page 63 and 64: Bibliographic revision burning velo
- Page 65 and 66: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 67 and 68: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 69 and 70: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 71 and 72: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 73 and 74: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 75 and 76: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 77 and 78: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 79 and 80: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 81 and 82: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 83 and 84: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 85 and 86: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 87 and 88: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL AN
Chapter 2<br />
with different characteristics were used, namely Herguido et al., (1992); Javier et al.,<br />
(1997); Kim et al., (2001) and Ro<strong>la</strong>ndo et al., (2002).<br />
It is expected that the rise of temperature leads to an increase in the rate of the several<br />
reactions that took p<strong>la</strong>ce during gasification process, which, globally, produce hydrogen<br />
and carbon monoxi<strong>de</strong> and eliminates hydrocarbons. At higher gasification<br />
temperatures lower solids and tar emissions are observed, which means that the<br />
produced gas may require a lower cost on gas cleaning processes.<br />
2.3.3.2. Pressure<br />
Gasifiers can be operated at elevated pressures, the advantage being for those end<br />
use applications where the gas is required to be compressed afterwards, as in a gas<br />
turbine.<br />
tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011<br />
Pressurized gasifiers have the following significant features:<br />
- Feeding is more complex and very costly, and has a high inert gas requirement<br />
for purging.<br />
- Capital costs of pressure equipment are much higher than for atmospheric<br />
equipment, although equipment sizes are much smaller.<br />
- Pressurized gasification systems can cost up to four times as much as<br />
atmospheric systems at power outputs up to 20 MW e . This disadvantage is<br />
countered by the higher efficiency, and this effect becomes significant at 30-50<br />
MW e , above which pressure systems are believed likely to be more economic<br />
than atmospheric systems.<br />
- Gas is supplied to the turbine at a<strong>de</strong>quate pressure, removing the need for gas<br />
compression and also permitting re<strong>la</strong>tively high tar contents in the gas; such tar<br />
needs to be completely burned in the turbine combustor.<br />
- Hot gas cleanup with mechanical filters (such as sintered metal or ceramic<br />
candles) is usually used, which reduces thermal and pressure energy losses<br />
and in principle in simpler and of lower cost than are scrubbing systems.<br />
- Overall system efficiency is higher owing to retention of sensible heat and<br />
chemical energy of tars in the product gas and the avoidance of a fuel gas<br />
compression stage ahead of the turbine. The only significant energy losses are<br />
to the environment and in provision of inert gas to the pressure fee<strong>de</strong>rs, and<br />
these can be as low as 5-8%, giving energy conversion efficiency for the<br />
gasifier itself of 92-95%. A corresponding atmospheric gasifier with water<br />
37