Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ... Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Experimental and numerical laminar syngas combustion In order to quantify the thermal losses of different mixtures special care must be taken in the heat flux integration. The integration time should capture the entire phenomenon. The cooling time is possible to control by establishing a certain cooling period. However, the combustion time changes with the fuel, initial pressure and equivalence ratio, which calculation is not straightforward. Therefore, the comparison of heat flux estimative already shown in figures 4.41-4.49 is made based on the heat flux peaks (Table 4.4). Table 4.4 – Heat Flux peaks for stoichiometric syngas-air and methane-air mixtures. tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 Qw (kW/m 2 ) Updraft Downdraft Methane (Boust, 2006) 1.0 bar, φ=0.8 216 kW/m 2 350 kW/m 2 - 1.0 bar, φ=1.0 368 kW/m 2 402 kW/m 2 649 kW/m 2 1.0 bar, φ=1.2 220 kW/m 2 313 kW/m 2 - 5.0 bar, φ=1.0 777 kW/m 2 949 kW/m 2 (*) 1622 kW/m 2 (*) linear interpolation. From Table 4.4 some conclusions can be drawn: - The heat flux increases with initial pressure increase for all cases. The amount (volume and energy) of the explosive mixture inside the vessel increases with initial pressure increase. - The heat flux increases with the heat value of the fuel-air mixture. In this case, one should also take into account the air-fuel ratio. - The equivalence ratio has the influence of decreasing the heat flux compared to stoichiometric mixtures and follows the behavior of pressure peak. The thickness of wall quench layers is a primary source of unburned fuels (Saeed and Stone, 2004). Thus, this combustion characteristic is very important and was predicted for stoichiometric updraft and downdraft syngas compositions by the Westbrook criterion defined by a zero flame stretch (figure 4.51). This is practically the case when the flame reaches the wall given the large curvature radius. The Westbrook criterion is valid in pressure range 1-40 bar and burning velocity correlation used in the code shows to be valid up to 33 bar, thus one impose this limit to quenching distance estimation. 136
Chapter 4 10000 Quenching distance (10 -6 m) 1000 100 10 Updraft Dow ndraft Methane 1 1 10 100 1000 Pressure (bar) tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 Figure 4.51 – Quenching distance estimation for stoichiometric syngas-air mixtures and comparison with stoichiometric methane-air mixture (Boust, 2006). Figure 4.51 also includes quenching distance of stoichiometric methane-air mixture for comparison reasons. The following correlation determined by Boust, (2006) was adopted δ q =50 P -0.45 (P>3.0 bar) with P in Mpa and δ q in μm. One can conclude that quenching distance decreases with the increase of pressure and is higher for lower heating value mixtures. The following correlations are developed for stoichiometric updraft and downdraft syngas-air mixtures, similar to the one presented by Westbrook et al., (1981) and Boust, (2006) for methane-air mixtures: δ q =450 P -0.79 , P>0.3 MPa (Updraft) (4.28) δ q =300 P -0.89 , P>0.3 MPa (Downdraft) (4.29) With δ q in μm and P in MPa. 4.3 Conclusion Laminar flame characteristics of three typical syngas compositions were studied in a constant volume chamber for various equivalence ratios. The influence of stretch rate on flame was determined by the correspondent Markstein and Karlovitz numbers. Combustion demonstrates a linear relationship between flame radius and time for syngas–air flames. The maximum value of syngas-air flame speeds is presented at the stoichiometric equivalence ratio, while lean or rich mixtures decrease the flame speeds. 137
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL AN
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 4 4.1 Laminar burning veloc
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4 4.1.1.1 Flame morphology
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 4 P i = 1.0 bar, Ti = 293 K
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 4 Figure 4.5 shows schliere
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 4 P i = 2.0 bar, T i = 293
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 4 Sn (m/s) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 4 5 ms 10 ms 15 ms 20 ms 25
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 4 behaviour of the curves r
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 4 1.50 Sn (m/s) 1.25 1.00 0
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 4 0.5 0.4 φ =1.0 Su (m/s)
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 4 variation of the normaliz
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 4 4.1.1.6 Comparison with o
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 4 The values of laminar bur
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Pressure (bar) 7 6 5 4 3
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 4 0.5 0.4 φ=1.2 Su (m/s) 0
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 4 0.3 φ=0.8 Su (m/s) 0.2 0
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 4 a minimum pressure to exp
- Page 125 and 126: Chapter 4 Notice the similar behavi
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 4 A very good agreement bet
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 4 ( ) Q = h T − T (4.21)
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 4 tel-00623090, version 1 -
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter 4 are tested and discussed.
- Page 135 and 136: Chapter 4 7 500 Pressure (bar) 6 5
- Page 137 and 138: Chapter 4 Pressure (bar) 7 6 5 4 3
- Page 139: Chapter 4 4.2.3.4 Quenching distanc
- Page 143 and 144: Chapter 5 CHAPTER 5 EXPERIMENTAL ST
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 5 30 10 25 8 Pressure (bar)
- Page 147 and 148: Chapter 5 30 Piston position (mm) 2
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 5 5.1.1.4 In-cylinder press
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 5 estimation of various par
- Page 153 and 154: Chapter 5 TDC 1.25 ms 2.5 ms 3.75 m
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 5 Piston position (mm) 500
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 5 tel-00623090, version 1 -
- Page 159 and 160: Chapter 5 From figure 5.15 is possi
- Page 161 and 162: Chapter 5 From figure 5.16 is obser
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 5 80 Pressure (bar) 70 60 5
- Page 165 and 166: Chapter 5 80 10 Pmax (bar) 70 60 50
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 5 -5.0 ms -3.75 ms -2.5 ms
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 5 observation emphasis the
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 6 CHAPTER 6 NUMERICAL SIMUL
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 6 centered at the spark plu
- Page 175 and 176: Chapter 6 H 2 O, (3) N 2 , (4) O 2
- Page 177 and 178: Chapter 6 For all the above express
- Page 179 and 180: Chapter 6 motions within the cylind
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 6 tel-00623090, version 1 -
- Page 183 and 184: Chapter 6 Heat transfer Wei et al.,
- Page 185 and 186: Chapter 6 The calibration coefficie
- Page 187 and 188: Chapter 6 6.3.2.2 In-cylinder volum
- Page 189 and 190: Chapter 6 40 Experimental 30 Numeri
Chapter 4<br />
10000<br />
Quenching distance (10 -6 m)<br />
1000<br />
100<br />
10<br />
Updraft<br />
Dow ndraft<br />
Methane<br />
1<br />
1 10 100 1000<br />
Pressure (bar)<br />
tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011<br />
Figure 4.51 – Quenching distance estimation for stoichiometric syngas-air mixtures and<br />
comparison with stoichiometric methane-air mixture (Boust, 2006).<br />
Figure 4.51 also inclu<strong>de</strong>s quenching distance of stoichiometric methane-air mixture for<br />
comparison reasons. The following corre<strong>la</strong>tion <strong>de</strong>termined by Boust, (2006) was<br />
adopted δ q =50 P -0.45 (P>3.0 bar) with P in Mpa and δ q in μm. One can conclu<strong>de</strong> that<br />
quenching distance <strong>de</strong>creases with the increase of pressure and is higher for lower<br />
heating value mixtures.<br />
The following corre<strong>la</strong>tions are <strong>de</strong>veloped for stoichiometric updraft and downdraft<br />
syngas-air mixtures, simi<strong>la</strong>r to the one presented by Westbrook et al., (1981) and<br />
Boust, (2006) for methane-air mixtures:<br />
δ q =450 P -0.79 , P>0.3 MPa (Updraft) (4.28)<br />
δ q =300 P -0.89 , P>0.3 MPa (Downdraft) (4.29)<br />
With δ q in μm and P in MPa.<br />
4.3 Conclusion<br />
Laminar f<strong>la</strong>me characteristics of three typical syngas compositions were studied in a<br />
constant volume chamber for various equivalence ratios. The influence of stretch rate<br />
on f<strong>la</strong>me was <strong>de</strong>termined by the correspon<strong>de</strong>nt Markstein and Karlovitz numbers.<br />
Combustion <strong>de</strong>monstrates a linear re<strong>la</strong>tionship between f<strong>la</strong>me radius and time for<br />
syngas–air f<strong>la</strong>mes. The maximum value of syngas-air f<strong>la</strong>me speeds is presented at the<br />
stoichiometric equivalence ratio, while lean or rich mixtures <strong>de</strong>crease the f<strong>la</strong>me speeds.<br />
137