Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ... Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...
Experimental and numerical laminar syngas combustion Similar curves are obtained for all syngas compositions under study being shifted by a value around 0.06 m/s in average between downdraft and updraft compositions and about 0.1 m/s between fluidized and updraft syngas. These results could be endorsed to: tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 - the heat value of the syngas compositions. This value varies from 5.4 (fluidized bed syngas) to 5.7 MJ/m 3 (downdraft syngas), which is in agreement, however not proportional to the burning velocities. - the amount of H 2 , due to its high reactivity, is a very important parameter to be considered. As shown in the Table 3.1 the amount of H 2 of fluidized bed syngas (9% by volume) is very close to the updraft syngas (11% by volume) and about half of the downdraft syngas (17% by volume). This explains the lowest burning velocity of the fluidized bed syngas and the highest shift when compared to downdraft syngas. However, the close amount of H 2 between fluidized bed and updraft syngas is not reflected in the burning velocity values shown in the Fig. 4.19. - and the amount of dilution by N 2 and CO 2 in the fuel gases H 2 -CO-CH 4 that compose the typical syngas mixtures. Again, fluidized bed syngas is he highest diluted syngas (70% by volume), being updraft and downdraft less diluted with 61% and 62% by volume, respectively. Therefore, the highest shift in burning velocity of fluidized bed syngas could be explained by its highest dilution. Based on the experimental data the correlations of unstretched laminar burning velocities as function of equivalence ratio can be fitted as follows: S =− 0.8125φ + 1.6375φ − 0.5725 (Updraft) (4.10) 0 2 u S =− 0.7313φ + 1.5428φ − 0.4924 (Downdraft) (4.11) 0 2 u S =− 0.7500φ + 1.5450φ − 0.6210 (Fluidized) (4.12) 0 2 u for updraft, downdraft and fluidized bed syngas–air mixture combustion, respectively. Information for fluidized syngas is limited due to ignition difficulties of this mixture. Formula (4.12) was fitted for equivalence ratios between 0.8 and 1.0. 4.1.1.5 Karlovitz and Markstein numbers Figures 4.20-4.22 illustrates the evolution of the normalized laminar burning velocity, S u /S 0 u, as a function of the normalized stretch rate, the Karlovitz number for typical syngas compositions at various equivalence ratios. From Fig. 4.20 one can see that the 106
Chapter 4 variation of the normalized burning velocity of updraft syngas with the Karlovitz number is linear. From Fig. 4.21 one can see that the variation of the normalized burning velocity of downdraft syngas with the Karlovitz number is generally linear and quasilinear for φ=0.8. From Fig. 4.22 one can see that the variation of the normalized burning velocity of fluidized bed syngas with the Karlovitz number is linear for φ=0.8 and quasi-linear for φ =1.0. 2.0 Su/S 0 u 1.8 1.6 1.4 φ 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.2 tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 1.0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Karlovitz Number Figure 4.20 – Evolution of the laminar burning velocity versus Karlovitz number for updraft syngas-air mixture at different equivalence ratios and 1.0 bar. Su/S 0 u 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 φ 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Karlovitz Number Figure 4.21 – Evolution of the laminar burning velocity versus Karlovitz number for downdraft syngas-air mixture at different equivalence ratios and 1.0 bar. 107
- Page 59 and 60: Bibliographic revision where the su
- Page 61 and 62: Bibliographic revision the stretche
- Page 63 and 64: Bibliographic revision burning velo
- Page 65 and 66: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 67 and 68: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 69 and 70: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 71 and 72: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 73 and 74: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 75 and 76: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 77 and 78: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 79 and 80: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 81 and 82: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 83 and 84: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 85 and 86: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 87 and 88: Experimental set ups and diagnostic
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL AN
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 4 4.1 Laminar burning veloc
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4 4.1.1.1 Flame morphology
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 4 P i = 1.0 bar, Ti = 293 K
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 4 Figure 4.5 shows schliere
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 4 P i = 2.0 bar, T i = 293
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 4 Sn (m/s) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 4 5 ms 10 ms 15 ms 20 ms 25
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 4 behaviour of the curves r
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 4 1.50 Sn (m/s) 1.25 1.00 0
- Page 109: Chapter 4 0.5 0.4 φ =1.0 Su (m/s)
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 4 4.1.1.6 Comparison with o
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 4 The values of laminar bur
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Pressure (bar) 7 6 5 4 3
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 4 0.5 0.4 φ=1.2 Su (m/s) 0
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 4 0.3 φ=0.8 Su (m/s) 0.2 0
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 4 a minimum pressure to exp
- Page 125 and 126: Chapter 4 Notice the similar behavi
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 4 A very good agreement bet
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 4 ( ) Q = h T − T (4.21)
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 4 tel-00623090, version 1 -
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter 4 are tested and discussed.
- Page 135 and 136: Chapter 4 7 500 Pressure (bar) 6 5
- Page 137 and 138: Chapter 4 Pressure (bar) 7 6 5 4 3
- Page 139 and 140: Chapter 4 4.2.3.4 Quenching distanc
- Page 141 and 142: Chapter 4 10000 Quenching distance
- Page 143 and 144: Chapter 5 CHAPTER 5 EXPERIMENTAL ST
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 5 30 10 25 8 Pressure (bar)
- Page 147 and 148: Chapter 5 30 Piston position (mm) 2
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 5 5.1.1.4 In-cylinder press
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 5 estimation of various par
- Page 153 and 154: Chapter 5 TDC 1.25 ms 2.5 ms 3.75 m
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 5 Piston position (mm) 500
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 5 tel-00623090, version 1 -
- Page 159 and 160: Chapter 5 From figure 5.15 is possi
Experimental and numerical <strong>la</strong>minar syngas <strong>combustion</strong><br />
Simi<strong>la</strong>r curves are obtained for all syngas compositions un<strong>de</strong>r study being shifted by a<br />
value around 0.06 m/s in average between downdraft and updraft compositions and<br />
about 0.1 m/s between fluidized and updraft syngas. These results could be endorsed<br />
to:<br />
tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011<br />
- the heat value of the syngas compositions. This value varies from 5.4 (fluidized<br />
bed syngas) to 5.7 MJ/m 3 (downdraft syngas), which is in agreement, however<br />
not proportional to the burning velocities.<br />
- the amount of H 2 , due to its high reactivity, is a very important parameter to be<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>red. As shown in the Table 3.1 the amount of H 2 of fluidized bed syngas<br />
(9% by volume) is very close to the updraft syngas (11% by volume) and about<br />
half of the downdraft syngas (17% by volume). This exp<strong>la</strong>ins the lowest burning<br />
velocity of the fluidized bed syngas and the highest shift when compared to<br />
downdraft syngas. However, the close amount of H 2 between fluidized bed and<br />
updraft syngas is not reflected in the burning velocity values shown in the Fig.<br />
4.19.<br />
- and the amount of dilution by N 2 and CO 2 in the fuel gases H 2 -CO-CH 4 that<br />
compose the typical syngas mixtures. Again, fluidized bed syngas is he highest<br />
diluted syngas (70% by volume), being updraft and downdraft less diluted with<br />
61% and 62% by volume, respectively. Therefore, the highest shift in burning<br />
velocity of fluidized bed syngas could be exp<strong>la</strong>ined by its highest dilution.<br />
Based on the experimental data the corre<strong>la</strong>tions of unstretched <strong>la</strong>minar burning<br />
velocities as function of equivalence ratio can be fitted as follows:<br />
S =− 0.8125φ + 1.6375φ<br />
− 0.5725 (Updraft) (4.10)<br />
0 2<br />
u<br />
S =− 0.7313φ + 1.5428φ<br />
− 0.4924 (Downdraft) (4.11)<br />
0 2<br />
u<br />
S =− 0.7500φ + 1.5450φ<br />
− 0.6210 (Fluidized) (4.12)<br />
0 2<br />
u<br />
for updraft, downdraft and fluidized bed syngas–air mixture <strong>combustion</strong>, respectively.<br />
Information for fluidized syngas is limited due to ignition difficulties of this mixture.<br />
Formu<strong>la</strong> (4.12) was fitted for equivalence ratios between 0.8 and 1.0.<br />
4.1.1.5 Karlovitz and Markstein numbers<br />
Figures 4.20-4.22 illustrates the evolution of the normalized <strong>la</strong>minar burning velocity,<br />
S u /S 0 u, as a function of the normalized stretch rate, the Karlovitz number for typical<br />
syngas compositions at various equivalence ratios. From Fig. 4.20 one can see that the<br />
106