Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...

Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ... Etude de la combustion de gaz de synthèse issus d'un processus de ...

tel.archives.ouvertes.fr
from tel.archives.ouvertes.fr More from this publisher
27.12.2013 Views

Experimental and numerical laminar syngas combustion Similar curves are obtained for all syngas compositions under study being shifted by a value around 0.06 m/s in average between downdraft and updraft compositions and about 0.1 m/s between fluidized and updraft syngas. These results could be endorsed to: tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 - the heat value of the syngas compositions. This value varies from 5.4 (fluidized bed syngas) to 5.7 MJ/m 3 (downdraft syngas), which is in agreement, however not proportional to the burning velocities. - the amount of H 2 , due to its high reactivity, is a very important parameter to be considered. As shown in the Table 3.1 the amount of H 2 of fluidized bed syngas (9% by volume) is very close to the updraft syngas (11% by volume) and about half of the downdraft syngas (17% by volume). This explains the lowest burning velocity of the fluidized bed syngas and the highest shift when compared to downdraft syngas. However, the close amount of H 2 between fluidized bed and updraft syngas is not reflected in the burning velocity values shown in the Fig. 4.19. - and the amount of dilution by N 2 and CO 2 in the fuel gases H 2 -CO-CH 4 that compose the typical syngas mixtures. Again, fluidized bed syngas is he highest diluted syngas (70% by volume), being updraft and downdraft less diluted with 61% and 62% by volume, respectively. Therefore, the highest shift in burning velocity of fluidized bed syngas could be explained by its highest dilution. Based on the experimental data the correlations of unstretched laminar burning velocities as function of equivalence ratio can be fitted as follows: S =− 0.8125φ + 1.6375φ − 0.5725 (Updraft) (4.10) 0 2 u S =− 0.7313φ + 1.5428φ − 0.4924 (Downdraft) (4.11) 0 2 u S =− 0.7500φ + 1.5450φ − 0.6210 (Fluidized) (4.12) 0 2 u for updraft, downdraft and fluidized bed syngas–air mixture combustion, respectively. Information for fluidized syngas is limited due to ignition difficulties of this mixture. Formula (4.12) was fitted for equivalence ratios between 0.8 and 1.0. 4.1.1.5 Karlovitz and Markstein numbers Figures 4.20-4.22 illustrates the evolution of the normalized laminar burning velocity, S u /S 0 u, as a function of the normalized stretch rate, the Karlovitz number for typical syngas compositions at various equivalence ratios. From Fig. 4.20 one can see that the 106

Chapter 4 variation of the normalized burning velocity of updraft syngas with the Karlovitz number is linear. From Fig. 4.21 one can see that the variation of the normalized burning velocity of downdraft syngas with the Karlovitz number is generally linear and quasilinear for φ=0.8. From Fig. 4.22 one can see that the variation of the normalized burning velocity of fluidized bed syngas with the Karlovitz number is linear for φ=0.8 and quasi-linear for φ =1.0. 2.0 Su/S 0 u 1.8 1.6 1.4 φ 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.2 tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011 1.0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Karlovitz Number Figure 4.20 – Evolution of the laminar burning velocity versus Karlovitz number for updraft syngas-air mixture at different equivalence ratios and 1.0 bar. Su/S 0 u 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 φ 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Karlovitz Number Figure 4.21 – Evolution of the laminar burning velocity versus Karlovitz number for downdraft syngas-air mixture at different equivalence ratios and 1.0 bar. 107

Experimental and numerical <strong>la</strong>minar syngas <strong>combustion</strong><br />

Simi<strong>la</strong>r curves are obtained for all syngas compositions un<strong>de</strong>r study being shifted by a<br />

value around 0.06 m/s in average between downdraft and updraft compositions and<br />

about 0.1 m/s between fluidized and updraft syngas. These results could be endorsed<br />

to:<br />

tel-00623090, version 1 - 13 Sep 2011<br />

- the heat value of the syngas compositions. This value varies from 5.4 (fluidized<br />

bed syngas) to 5.7 MJ/m 3 (downdraft syngas), which is in agreement, however<br />

not proportional to the burning velocities.<br />

- the amount of H 2 , due to its high reactivity, is a very important parameter to be<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red. As shown in the Table 3.1 the amount of H 2 of fluidized bed syngas<br />

(9% by volume) is very close to the updraft syngas (11% by volume) and about<br />

half of the downdraft syngas (17% by volume). This exp<strong>la</strong>ins the lowest burning<br />

velocity of the fluidized bed syngas and the highest shift when compared to<br />

downdraft syngas. However, the close amount of H 2 between fluidized bed and<br />

updraft syngas is not reflected in the burning velocity values shown in the Fig.<br />

4.19.<br />

- and the amount of dilution by N 2 and CO 2 in the fuel gases H 2 -CO-CH 4 that<br />

compose the typical syngas mixtures. Again, fluidized bed syngas is he highest<br />

diluted syngas (70% by volume), being updraft and downdraft less diluted with<br />

61% and 62% by volume, respectively. Therefore, the highest shift in burning<br />

velocity of fluidized bed syngas could be exp<strong>la</strong>ined by its highest dilution.<br />

Based on the experimental data the corre<strong>la</strong>tions of unstretched <strong>la</strong>minar burning<br />

velocities as function of equivalence ratio can be fitted as follows:<br />

S =− 0.8125φ + 1.6375φ<br />

− 0.5725 (Updraft) (4.10)<br />

0 2<br />

u<br />

S =− 0.7313φ + 1.5428φ<br />

− 0.4924 (Downdraft) (4.11)<br />

0 2<br />

u<br />

S =− 0.7500φ + 1.5450φ<br />

− 0.6210 (Fluidized) (4.12)<br />

0 2<br />

u<br />

for updraft, downdraft and fluidized bed syngas–air mixture <strong>combustion</strong>, respectively.<br />

Information for fluidized syngas is limited due to ignition difficulties of this mixture.<br />

Formu<strong>la</strong> (4.12) was fitted for equivalence ratios between 0.8 and 1.0.<br />

4.1.1.5 Karlovitz and Markstein numbers<br />

Figures 4.20-4.22 illustrates the evolution of the normalized <strong>la</strong>minar burning velocity,<br />

S u /S 0 u, as a function of the normalized stretch rate, the Karlovitz number for typical<br />

syngas compositions at various equivalence ratios. From Fig. 4.20 one can see that the<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!