Wearing the hair shirt Wearing the hair shirt - Microsoft Research
Wearing the hair shirt Wearing the hair shirt - Microsoft Research Wearing the hair shirt Wearing the hair shirt - Microsoft Research
Syntactic redundancy Seductive idea: provide just one way of doing any particular thing Haskell’s choice: provide multiple ways, and let the programmer decide Main example: “declaration style” vs “expression style”
“Declaration style” Define a function as a series of independent equations map f [] = [] map f (x:xs) = f x : map f xs sign x | x>0 = 1 | x==0 = 0 | x
- Page 1 and 2: Wearing the hair shirt A retrospect
- Page 3 and 4: Haskell is 15 years old (born FPCA
- Page 5 and 6: Timeline Sept 87: kick off Apr 90:
- Page 7 and 8: Reflections on the process The i
- Page 9: Reflections on process Self-appoin
- Page 14 and 15: “Expression style” Define a fun
- Page 16 and 17: Example (ICFP02 prog comp) Pattern
- Page 18 and 19: What really matters?
- Page 20 and 21: But... Laziness makes it much, muc
- Page 22: Combinator libraries Recursive valu
- Page 25 and 26: Monadic I/O A value of type (IO t)
- Page 27 and 28: Connecting I/O operations (>>=) ::
- Page 29 and 30: Control structures Values of type (
- Page 31 and 32: Monads Exceptions type Exn a = E
- Page 33 and 34: The IO monad The IO monad allows
- Page 35 and 36: What have we achieved? ...without
- Page 37 and 38: Open challenge 1 Open problem: the
- Page 39 and 40: Monad summary Monads are a beautif
- Page 41 and 42: What really matters? Laziness Purit
- Page 44 and 45: Type classes class Eq a where (==)
- Page 46 and 47: Type classes over time Type classe
- Page 48 and 49: Quickcheck propRev :: [Int] -> Bool
- Page 50 and 51: Extensiblity Like OOP, one can add
- Page 52 and 53: Type-based dispatch class Num a whe
- Page 54 and 55: Cool generalisations Multi-paramet
- Page 56: Type classes summary A much more f
- Page 59 and 60: Is sexy good? Yes! Well typed prog
- Page 61 and 62: Destination = F w
Syntactic redundancy<br />
Seductive idea: provide just one way<br />
of doing any particular thing<br />
Haskell’s choice: provide multiple<br />
ways, and let <strong>the</strong> programmer decide<br />
Main example: “declaration style” vs<br />
“expression style”
Change language