27.12.2013 Views

Revisional study of neotropical Beilschmiedia species (Lauraceae ...

Revisional study of neotropical Beilschmiedia species (Lauraceae ...

Revisional study of neotropical Beilschmiedia species (Lauraceae ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Most <strong>of</strong> the revisional <strong>study</strong> was done at Missouri Botanical Garden (MO), St. Louis,<br />

U. S. A., where a specialist <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lauraceae</strong>, van der Werff, works and a large amount <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>neotropical</strong> <strong>Lauraceae</strong> col1ections are preserved. Loans <strong>of</strong> <strong>neotropical</strong> <strong>Beilschmiedia</strong> <strong>species</strong><br />

were requested from major herbaria (A, B, BM, BR, C, F, IEB, K, LL, MEXU, NY, P, R,<br />

RB, S, U, US, YEN). Two major herbaria in Costa Rica (CR, INB) were visited. Some<br />

collections obtained by the staffs <strong>of</strong> Missouri Botanical Garden had been observed before<br />

they were sent to the other herbaria (FCME, MEXU, INB, etc.).<br />

Field trips were carried out in Costa Rica in March, 1996. Habit and surroundings <strong>of</strong><br />

several <strong>Beilschmiedia</strong> <strong>species</strong> were observed in the field, and the leaves, flowers and fruits<br />

were collected for a further <strong>study</strong>. Most <strong>of</strong> the specimens collected there are kept at INB and<br />

MO.<br />

For the <strong>species</strong> delimitation I en1ployed morphological <strong>species</strong> concept. I usually tried<br />

to find more than one characters to delinlitate the <strong>species</strong>. If there are a series <strong>of</strong> intermediate<br />

collections, I did not divide the cmnplex even when the extremes appeared distinct enough.<br />

The complex should be kept rather than divided before they are studied with more materials<br />

or some biological (e.g., genetic) investigations. I avoided intraspecific categories, because I<br />

agree with Burger's opinion "we need much n1ore (biological) information to make a<br />

sub<strong>species</strong> than to make a <strong>species</strong>·" (quoted by Rohwer 1993 a). Neither did I make any<br />

infrageneric categories because comprehensive <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> the genus <strong>Beilschmiedia</strong> should be<br />

made before establishing any infrageneric categories.<br />

In this <strong>study</strong> I recognized four new <strong>species</strong>. However, I do not intend to publish these<br />

<strong>species</strong> formally in this dissertation because dissertations are not available to as many people<br />

as journals. The fom1al publication <strong>of</strong> these new <strong>species</strong> will be made in a botanical journal.<br />

A description <strong>of</strong> each <strong>species</strong> is in the following order; name <strong>of</strong> the <strong>species</strong>, a list <strong>of</strong><br />

basionym and taxonomical synonym, Latin diagnosis if it is a new <strong>species</strong>, general<br />

description, phenology, distribution, con1mon nan1e, economical use, a list <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

specimens exan1ined, and notes. In the list <strong>of</strong> additional specimens except for type<br />

collections, if the specimen is collected by a tean1, only last name <strong>of</strong> the first collector on the<br />

label is listed. But if the last name <strong>of</strong> the collector is a common name like "Smith" and<br />

"Allen", an initial <strong>of</strong> the first (and middle, if present) name <strong>of</strong> the collector might be also<br />

listed. For example, if it is a type collection, Berg & Akkem1ans becomes "Berg &<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!