27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is never the result of an underlying necessity, however, it follows<br />

that every hegemony is susceptible to counter-hegemonic practices.<br />

In brief, if things could always be different, it can always be claimed<br />

that things should be different. Everything can become the object of<br />

political struggle.<br />

However, this positive consequence hangs together with a less<br />

positive one. If we accept this ontological position, we also have to<br />

accept that an all-inclusive, fixed system of meaning is impossible.<br />

There can be no meaning or identity without excluding something.<br />

Every identity meets in the end a limit which can no longer be grasped<br />

in a meaningful way. What lies beyond the limit is fundamentally<br />

threatening towards what lies inside. But if we start speaking about<br />

collective identities, this implies the following:<br />

“we are always dealing with the creation of a ‘we’ which can exist only by<br />

the demarcation of a ‘they’… [and] [s]ince all forms of political identities<br />

entail a we/they distinction, this means that the possibility of emergence<br />

of antagonism can never be eliminated. It is therefore an illusion to believe<br />

in a society from which antagonism would have been eradicated.” [10]<br />

This quotation from Mouffe points to the impossibility of society as<br />

such. Society becomes impossible in the sense that there will always be<br />

a ‘they’, something that cannot be included but that necessarily must<br />

be excluded. This impossibility of society makes every society political.<br />

But every society can institute the political in different ways. The<br />

concrete way in which antagonism is dealt with in particular societies<br />

is what Mouffe calls politics. Let us now look at how democracies deal<br />

with antagonism.<br />

93<br />

DEMOCRACY, HOPE<br />

AND NIHILISM<br />

Thomas Decreus<br />

Democratic politics and hope<br />

A democratic regime differs from other regimes in the way that it recognizes<br />

its own contingency as well as the antagonistic nature of the social.<br />

The latter is even cultivated by institutionalizing a space for contestation<br />

10<br />

Mouffe (2005) 15, 16.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!