27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52<br />

DEMOCRACY TODAY<br />

The democratic element is brought in by the theory of political<br />

representation as it sets the context for the permanent possibility of<br />

feedback, i.e. the continuous circularity between state and society.<br />

Representative democracy is thus incomplete without the process-element<br />

(the temporal narrative). To sum up: the (spatial) division between<br />

ruler and ruled installs power, and the division of time in different<br />

legislatures creates the possibility of control to power. Periodic rule<br />

and the implied opportunities for contestation form the conditions for<br />

a system in which the representative can appropriately and creatively<br />

‘use’ the (originated) power. The temporal sequence thus prevents the<br />

embodiment or possession of power and ascertains that the place of<br />

power remains empty.<br />

Representation becomes a democratic instrument once the representational<br />

relationship becomes political. [9] I am alluding here to the<br />

way in which a partisan, and thus particular, viewpoint can temporarily<br />

fulfill the role of representing the whole of society and thus represent<br />

the general. The plurality of social and cultural identities that exist in<br />

society gets translated into political “alliances and programs” (Urbinati<br />

2006, 37). These alliances try to provide an answer to the fragmentation<br />

of society, by “articulat[ing] the ‘universal interest’ from peripheral<br />

viewpoints” (Ibid.). Although partisanship is concerned with the<br />

interests of its followers, the fact that their aspirations are “to represent<br />

the general” makes that they translate their partial interests “in a<br />

language that is general” (Ibid.). Laclau gives the same characterisation<br />

of “the only truly political society”. “Universality only exists incarnating<br />

– and subverting – particularity, but, conversely, no particularity<br />

can become political without being the locus of universalizing effects”<br />

(Laclau 2001, 10).<br />

9<br />

Urbinati states this clearly in the following citation. “This temporal perspective transforms<br />

representation into a political resource, a way to perfect democracy by emancipating it<br />

from the destabilizing force of presentism and the one-dimensional character of the will”<br />

(Urbinati 2006, 225). But we could phrase the sentence also the other way around. Politics<br />

would not be politics without the role of representation as it fulfills the role of mediation<br />

through “voice and gesture, spacing and temporality” (Ibid., 37).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!