27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the rest of this paper I will take the aesthetic understanding of<br />

representation as the one that is best able to inform our understanding<br />

of political representation. Saward’s theory of the representative claim<br />

also draws on this understanding. What he calls the representative<br />

claim is the ‘basic currency of political representation’ (Saward 2006,<br />

299). It is a detailed analysis of what I called before the core that is characteristic<br />

of all forms of representation. The definition is as follows:<br />

A maker of representations (‘M’) puts forward a subject (‘S’) which stands<br />

for an object (‘O’) that is related to a referent (‘R’) and is offered to an audience<br />

(‘A’) (Saward 2010, 36). [5]<br />

Here, Saward captures the aesthetic understanding of representation<br />

in a clear definition. As we saw, the etymology of the concept<br />

designates only two instances literally: something that is absent (the<br />

represented) is made present by something else (the representative).<br />

Saward however states that represented and representative can both<br />

be split up in respectively a referent and an object, and a maker and<br />

a subject. By inserting these divisions Saward makes explicit in what<br />

the aesthetic gap between the representative and represented exists.<br />

On the side of the represented, we should differentiate between the<br />

image that is created of the represented (the object) and the represented<br />

itself (referent). On the side of the representative: the one who stands<br />

for the object, who presents him/herself as the representative (the<br />

subject) is not always the same as the maker of the claim. The maker<br />

of the claim to represent can for example be a spin <strong>do</strong>ctor who creates<br />

an image of how the subject should present the object. This complex<br />

interrelationship of presentations is seen, perceived by the audience,<br />

which than rejects, accepts or ignores the claim. As Saward’s definition<br />

takes into account that the ‘objectively given referent’ is always depicted<br />

in a specific way (O) and the one who represents is an actor taking on<br />

45<br />

GOVERNANCE<br />

THROUGH THE LENS OF<br />

REPRESENTATION<br />

Femmy Thewissen<br />

5<br />

Schematically it would look like this:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!