27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38<br />

DEMOCRACY TODAY<br />

and key characteristics of this new mode of decision-making. As the<br />

main interest of this article is to explore the potential legitimacy of<br />

governance-decision-making, a subsection will be devoted to ways<br />

in which the legitimacy question has been addressed in the past. The<br />

second section will be devoted to philosophical research on representation,<br />

in order to introduce a new perspective into the legitimacy<br />

debate. I contrast here a formalistic and a more substantive view on<br />

representation and argue that the last one reveals a crucial aspect of<br />

representation that is often obscured. Michael Saward’s theory of<br />

‘the representative claim’ will be presented here as it <strong>do</strong>es comprise<br />

this substantive view on representation and can be read as a theory<br />

applicable to the empirical situation of governance-decision-making.<br />

In the third section the characteristics of representative government<br />

will be explored. By drawing on the reading of Nadia Urbinati, I will<br />

state that the institutional framework of a representative government<br />

reveals two aspects that are crucial in turning representation into representative<br />

democracy: the spatial division (between state and society)<br />

and the temporal narrative (generated by the sequence of elections<br />

and intra-election time). This leads me in a concluding section to the<br />

implications of the sketched confrontation between governance and<br />

government.<br />

Governance<br />

Definition and characteristics<br />

The particular meaning we currently attribute to governance only<br />

arose after the cold war. Before, the term governance was used as a<br />

synonym for governing, in the sense of the deliberate “attempt to shape<br />

socio-economic structures and processes” (Mayntz 2003, 27). We have<br />

to situate this understanding in the historical situation in which the<br />

welfare-state was pre<strong>do</strong>minant. It implied that the state occupied the<br />

most powerful position in the classical threefold between state, society<br />

and market. After the Cold War, the interdependence, that started pervading<br />

the whole world, was perceived as a completely new challenge.<br />

Globalization processes started to occur and gradually challenged the<br />

pre<strong>do</strong>minant position of the (welfare-)state. In reaction to these changes,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!