27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For Agamben to accept this conception of law and power is to<br />

give a chance to indeterminacy and arbitrariness and, moreover, he<br />

correctly emphasizes Schmitt’s account as aporetic:<br />

The specific contribution of Schmitt’s theory is precisely to have made<br />

such an articulation between state of exception and juridical order possible.<br />

It is a para<strong>do</strong>xical articulation, for what must be inscribed within<br />

the law is something that is essentially exterior to it, that is, nothing less<br />

than the suspension of the juridical order itself (hence the aporetical<br />

formulation: “In a juridical sense, an order still exists… even if it is not a<br />

juridical order ”) [9] .<br />

Even if one could find a bit strange to say how this aporia could<br />

be a contribution [10] , Agamben point is quite clear: one cannot justify<br />

as law something that is completely against it. We could say, pushing<br />

further Dworkin’s metaphor, that here, at the same time, there is and<br />

there is not a <strong>do</strong>ughnut or, saying it in another way, that the hole in<br />

the <strong>do</strong>ughnut is the <strong>do</strong>ughnut itself.<br />

To highlight this aporetic “juridicization” of exception is for<br />

Agamben essential, and it is what marks his conceptual move as<br />

completely opposite with respect to Schmitt’s one. If for Schmitt this<br />

aporia is somehow hidden (exception is something that he politically<br />

en<strong>do</strong>rses), for Agamben exception and its aporetic status culminate<br />

in an obscene paradigm that characterize the modern way of understanding<br />

the articulation between law and power. Within a state of<br />

exception the norm is in force, is in potentia, but it is not applied, is<br />

not in actus; conversely, acts that <strong>do</strong> not have the value of law acquire<br />

the force of law. It is because of this contradictory situation posed by<br />

the juridicization of exception that for Agamben our times are ultima<br />

facie governed by fiction:<br />

239<br />

STATE OF EXCEPTION AND<br />

IMPASSE DYNAMICS<br />

Emanuele Bottazzi<br />

The state of exception is an anomic space in which what is a stake is a force<br />

of law without law (which should therefore be written: force of law). Such<br />

9<br />

Agamben (2005): p. 33.<br />

10<br />

In fact Agamben in the Italian text uses the word prestazione that points more correctly to<br />

the less positive semantic field of ‘service’ or ‘performance’, see Agamben (2003): p. 45.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!