27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

But we must specially stress: there is tension among the large<br />

range of cultural manifestations of Philosophy as new perspective<br />

themselves: Science, Lyric Poetry, Tragedy, History, Rhetoric, Ethics,<br />

Politics etc. They all face the new need for foundation, but it is particularly<br />

important to observe how they fight! Among the pre-socratics - the<br />

first scientists to represent the new perspective - there were not two<br />

concordant theories to describe the archai of physis.<br />

The examples multiply. Comedians argue against Politicians (see<br />

Aristophanes in Horsemen) and against Philosophers (see Aristophanes<br />

in Clouds); Scientists argue against Scientists (see Heraclito in Frag.<br />

81 [5], and so many other examples [6]); Philosophers argue against<br />

Tragedy and Comedy (see Plato in Republic, Book 3), Politicians and<br />

Rectors argue against Philosophers (Plato in Apology to Socrates),<br />

Philosophers argue against Rhetoric (see the whole platonic work!).<br />

Regardless their participation in the same broad perspective we call<br />

16<br />

DEMOCRACY TODAY<br />

interests. But humor wouldn’t be the only nor the worse reaction to Philosophy. Athenians<br />

convicted Philosophers as Socrates and Protagoras to death.<br />

In the other hand, Philosophy’s criticism against mythological world is not charming. Let<br />

us recall these two fragments of Xenophanes (from Diels & Kranz, Fragmenta):<br />

(11.) SEXT. adv. math. IX 193<br />

panta theois’ anethêkan Homêros th’ Hêsio<strong>do</strong>s te,<br />

hossa par’ anthrôpoisin oneidea kai psogos estin,<br />

kleptein moicheuein te kai allêlous apateuein.<br />

(15.) CLEM. Str. v 110 [II 400, 1 St.] nach B 14<br />

all‘ ei cheiras echon boes êe leontes<br />

ê grapsai cheiressi kai erga telein haper andres,<br />

hippoi men th’ hippoisi boes de te bousin homoias<br />

kai theôn ideas egraphon kai sômat’ epoioun<br />

toiauth’ hoion per k’autoi demas eichon .<br />

I’m sorry for my careless translation:<br />

Fragment 11.: Homer and Hesiod have attributed everything to Gods, everything which<br />

deserves rejection and disapproval, robbery, adulterous, and mutual fraud.<br />

Fragment 15.: If bulls, horses and lions had hands and could use them to draw and to<br />

create as human beings can, horses similar to horses, bulls similar <strong>do</strong> bulls, they would<br />

draw the shape of gods and their bodies just as they own have.<br />

5<br />

Frag. 81.: “ ancestral of the charlatans (Pythagoras)”.<br />

6<br />

Remember the Aristotelian reference to Plato in Nicomachean Ethics (first Book) according<br />

to which it is more pious to stand with truth rather than with friends.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!