Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

them in and for the twenty-first century. In so doing, we may be closer
to a conception of democratic participation that does not compromise
democracy.
Bibliography
ALMOND, Gabriel. (1988) Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science, PS:
Political Science and Politics, vol. 21, no.4.
DIAMOND, Larry and Marc F. Plattner, eds. (1996) The Global Resurgence of Democracy,
2 nd edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
DRYZEK, John. (2005) Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to
Agonism and Analgesia, Political Theory, vol. 33.
HAUPTMANN, Emily. (2001) Can Less Be More? Leftist Deliberative Democrats’ Critique
of Participatory Democracy, Polity, vol. 33, no. 3.
HELD, David. (1987) Models of Democracy, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
MANSBRIDGE, Jane (1997) Normative Theory and Voice and Equality, American Political
Science review, vol. 91, no. 2.
RICCI, David. (1984) The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship and Democracy,
New Haven: Yale University Press.
RIEMER, Neil. (1962) The Revival of Democratic Theory New York: Appleton-Century-
Crofts.
OBER, Josiah. (2007) Natural capacities and democracy as a good-in-itself, Philos Stud
132.
PATEMAN, Carole (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
SHAPIRO, Ian. (2003) The Moral Foundations of Politics, New Haven: Yale University
Press.
SWIFT, Adam. (2006). Political Philosophy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
THOMPSON, Simon & Paul Hoggett. (2001) The Emotional Dynamics of Deliberative
Democracy, Policy and Politics, vol.29, no.3.
WARREN, Mark E. (1996) What Should We Expect from More Democracy?Radically
Democratic Responses to Politics, Political Theory, vol.24.
159
DEMOCRATIC COMPROMISE
OR COMPROMISING
DEMOCRACY: RETHINKING
PARTICIPATION
Heidi Matisonn