27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146<br />

DEMOCRACY TODAY<br />

still in use today, it is the ‘black’, ‘coloured’ and ‘indian’ marginalized<br />

or working class group of South Africans. If this economic situation is<br />

coupled with the macro-political situation with regard to representation<br />

discussed above, it is beyond dispute to conclude that most groups in<br />

South Africa remain unfree as a direct result of their lack of meaningful<br />

representation: either they have no agents, trustees, defenders of<br />

their identities/interests or varieties of possible images upon which to<br />

reflect or they have powerless representatives, whose powerlessness is<br />

a consequence of the persistence of <strong>do</strong>mination within extant power<br />

relations or institutional arrangements that <strong>do</strong> not enable effective<br />

representation.<br />

One of the ruling party’s responses to these problems regarding<br />

meaningful representation has been to try and enhance democratic<br />

participation of the citizenry at local government level. But this is not a<br />

response to the problem since it is based on the premise that the problem<br />

regarding national representative politics arises as a consequence<br />

of lack of citizen participation and is thus best resolvable via greater<br />

participation and deliberation at local level. As I have argued above, the<br />

problem is not about the degree or form of citizen political participation<br />

but about the way in which representation is being enacted in South<br />

Africa. Moreover, even if we were to assume for argument’s sake that the<br />

logic behind these initiatives is a good one, it amounts to nothing more<br />

than win<strong>do</strong>w-dressing. This is the case because although citizens are<br />

given some access to deliberation prior to decision-making, it is ward<br />

councillors who ultimately make the decisions behind closed <strong>do</strong>ors<br />

and most have firm party loyalty, not least of all because, in accordance<br />

with the electoral system specified in the constitution, half of the<br />

councillors are instated through proportional representation, whilst<br />

the remaining half are ward constituent representatives. Therefore,<br />

as is the case at national level, councillors are not accountable to their<br />

constituencies but accountable to party leaders. [38]<br />

This condition of little or no meaningful representation is unhealthy<br />

for any state, let alone a new, emerging democracy and nor <strong>do</strong>es it bode<br />

38<br />

Tapscott, ‘The Challenges of Building Participatory Government’, in Thompson (ed),<br />

Participatory Governance: Citizens and the State in South Africa (University of the Western<br />

Cape 2007), p. 87.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!