Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho
Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho
Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
standard-bearers for his ‘negative’ conception of free<strong>do</strong>m, are ultimately<br />
concerned with whether or not someone is able to exercise his or her<br />
power to act, that is to bring something about, to <strong>do</strong> something.<br />
But it is in the work of Marx that we see the full efflorescence of the<br />
substantive, concrete account of modern free<strong>do</strong>m as power that underpins<br />
my argument here. Marx unequivocally identifies free<strong>do</strong>m with<br />
power. Unlike Berlin’s distinction between two concepts of free<strong>do</strong>m,<br />
Marx distinguishes three concepts of free<strong>do</strong>m. The first is what Marx<br />
associates with the anarchism of Max Stirner, but in today’s parlance<br />
we would call ‘negative’ free<strong>do</strong>m or the ‘free<strong>do</strong>m’ of libertarianism. [9]<br />
The second concept of free<strong>do</strong>m Marx discusses he identifies with<br />
Kant’s view of free<strong>do</strong>m and which he defines as the ability a creature<br />
has to make its own decisions, or govern itself. [10] The third concept is<br />
the one Marx calls the ‘materialist’ notion of free<strong>do</strong>m that identifies<br />
free<strong>do</strong>m with power and that he thinks is the full, sophisticated notion.<br />
He argues that in this account, free<strong>do</strong>m comprises the ‘the conjunction<br />
of the ability to determine what one will <strong>do</strong> and the power to <strong>do</strong><br />
what one decides to <strong>do</strong>’, and anything less than this is a mere sha<strong>do</strong>w<br />
of the concept of free<strong>do</strong>m. [11] This means that for Marx the other two<br />
concepts he discusses, and a fortiori the main three concepts analysed<br />
in the modern literature, are poor approximations of this real form of<br />
free<strong>do</strong>m.<br />
Another way of construing the importance of this more substantive<br />
account of free<strong>do</strong>m is that it provides a means of thinking about<br />
how free<strong>do</strong>m relates to the exercise of our powers as individuals and<br />
how we are enabled and disabled by a variety of internal and external<br />
abilities, obstacles, mechanisms and power relations. This is something,<br />
again, that a number of other thinkers have identified and stressed from<br />
a wide range of political perspectives. Here free<strong>do</strong>m is conceived as<br />
‘effective power’, that is, free<strong>do</strong>m is rightly identified as a precondition<br />
131<br />
FREEDOM, POWER AND<br />
REPRESENTATION<br />
Lawrence Hamilton<br />
9<br />
Marx and Engels, The German Ideology, in MECW, Vol 5 (Lawrence and Wishart 1976),<br />
pp. 304-6.<br />
10<br />
Ibid., pp. 193-5. For Kant, free<strong>do</strong>m is the mere ability to determine the will, irrespective<br />
of whether this is even translated into actual action in the world. Geuss, Politics and the<br />
Imagination (Princeton UP 2009), p. 57.<br />
11<br />
Marx and Engels, The German Ideology, pp. 305-6; quote is from Geuss, ‘Metaphysics<br />
of Right’, p. 57.