27.12.2013 Views

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

Democracy Today.indb - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

130<br />

DEMOCRACY TODAY<br />

‘free from impediment’ or ‘living in a free state’, but rather a series of<br />

much more concrete political, economic and social goals: being free<br />

to determine who rules and how they rule; being free to produce,<br />

exchange and consume wherever and whenever; being free to love,<br />

procreate, entertain oneself and others, bring up one’s children and<br />

so on in conditions free of poverty and racial and gender discrimination<br />

and <strong>do</strong>mination.<br />

It turns out, moreover, that thinking about free<strong>do</strong>m as both about<br />

being able to determine what one will <strong>do</strong> and having the power to <strong>do</strong><br />

what one decides to <strong>do</strong> is more common than is normally supposed. A<br />

surprising number and variety of political theorists associate free<strong>do</strong>m<br />

and power in exactly these terms. It is a mainstay of much of Antiquity,<br />

in particular Roman thought and practice. As Livy put it, ‘free<strong>do</strong>m is<br />

to be in one’s own power’. [4] Then, at the beginning of the modern era,<br />

Hobbes argues that: ‘A FREE-MAN, is he, that in those things, which by<br />

his strength and wit he is able to <strong>do</strong>, is not hindred to <strong>do</strong>e what he has a will<br />

to <strong>do</strong>’. Hobbes therefore sees two essential elements in the concept of<br />

human free<strong>do</strong>m. a) The idea of possessing an underlying power or ability<br />

to act: it is in relation to a ‘man’s power to <strong>do</strong> what hee would that<br />

we speak of his being or not being at liberty’. [5] b) The matter of being<br />

unimpeded in the exercise of such powers. Rousseau too argues that<br />

power is one of two essential elements in free<strong>do</strong>m: ‘Every free action<br />

has two causes which concur in producing it, one moral, namely the<br />

will which determines it, the other physical, namely the power which<br />

executes it’. [6] And then Burke, a very different sort of political thinker,<br />

argues that ‘liberty, when men act in bodies, is power’. [7] Even Mill, late<br />

in On Liberty, argues that, amongst other things the ‘political education<br />

of a free people’ requires ‘habituating them to act from public or<br />

semi-public motives’ and that ‘[w]ithout these habits and powers, a<br />

free constitution can neither be worked nor preserved.’ [8] In other<br />

words, a whole array of thinkers, even thinkers that Berlin lauds as<br />

4<br />

‘Libertas suis stat viribus’: Livy, Ab Urbe Condita, Book 35, Ch 32, 11.<br />

5<br />

Hobbes, Leviathan, pp. 146, 62, 91.<br />

6<br />

Rousseau, Social Contract, p. 82.<br />

7<br />

Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Conor Cruise O’Brien (Penguin 2004),<br />

p. 91.<br />

8<br />

Mill, On Liberty, pp. 121-2; and pp. 7, 16-17, 116.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!