HEINRICH HEINE - Repositories

HEINRICH HEINE - Repositories HEINRICH HEINE - Repositories

repositories.tdl.org
from repositories.tdl.org More from this publisher
27.12.2013 Views

Heinrich Heine crawling reptile — ballads which hide under their liveliness, as a woman under her veil, their evil thoughts and their poisons. There are love songs, which bear you encradled along their stream, to drown you at last in one Satanic word — for it is the original characteristic of this poet to make you drink the gall and the lees of our times, in the form of expression and the honey of primitive ages — the age of Byron in the age of Hans Sachs." ^ Quinet's literary portrait of Heine was not unfriendly or unjust. The German poet, during his twenties and thirties, aspired to share Byron's laurels and liked to see himself in the role of a modem Mephistopheles. His clownish flirting with St. Simonian sects in the early Eighteen-Thirties, his infatuation with extreme radical doctrines, and at the same time his revelation of their comic absurdities — confused friends and foes ahke. Nor was this mystification wholly displeasing to him. As a consequence of the dubious light in which he was seen and apparently wished to be seen, English journals were at a loss in appraising his stand on any issue. The results were often entertaining. Thus, the Foreign Quarterly Review devoted a lengthy article in its issue of August, 1832, to a defense of Heine, whom it viewed as perhaps the ablest satirist of the radical [16]

Blackguard and Apostate doctrines which he was supposedly espousing. If he really believed what he claimed to believe, it felt that no words would be too strong to express the mingled indignation, disgust, and contempt which such productions deserved to inspire. But, in its opinion, Heine could not possibly mean seriously the horrible pronouncements elaborated so piquantly in his Travel Sketches — any more than Borne could be held responsible for similar expressions of faith in the Letters from Paris. Obviously, both of these works were admirable satires on the German ultra-liberal press. Under the disguise of an affected and exaggerated liberalism, Heine and Borne were aiming to turn into ridicule the entire slang of the party and to expose mercilessly the wild, unprincipled views of its leading organs in Germany, their bare-faced attempts on the credulity of the public, and their total incapacity to substitute anything in place of the systems which they were seeking to destroy. Borne and Heine had apparently become aware of the ruinous effects of the German press on morality and taste, and in their indignation had penned vitriolic satires upon its spirit and tendency. Both had for a time collaborated with the liberal movements but had been converted to wiser and sounder views by the extravagance and insanity of [17]

Heinrich Heine<br />

crawling reptile — ballads which hide under their<br />

liveliness, as a woman under her veil, their evil<br />

thoughts and their poisons. There are love songs,<br />

which bear you encradled along their stream, to<br />

drown you at last in one Satanic word — for it is the<br />

original characteristic of this poet to make you<br />

drink the gall and the lees of our times, in the form<br />

of expression and the honey of primitive ages — the<br />

age of Byron in the age of Hans Sachs." ^<br />

Quinet's literary portrait of Heine was not unfriendly<br />

or unjust. The German poet, during his<br />

twenties and thirties, aspired to share Byron's laurels<br />

and liked to see himself in the role of a modem<br />

Mephistopheles. His clownish flirting with St. Simonian<br />

sects in the early Eighteen-Thirties, his infatuation<br />

with extreme radical doctrines, and at the<br />

same time his revelation of their comic absurdities —<br />

confused friends and foes ahke. Nor was this mystification<br />

wholly displeasing to him. As a consequence<br />

of the dubious light in which he was seen and apparently<br />

wished to be seen, English journals were<br />

at a loss in appraising his stand on any issue. The results<br />

were often entertaining. Thus, the Foreign<br />

Quarterly Review devoted a lengthy article in its<br />

issue of August, 1832, to a defense of Heine, whom<br />

it viewed as perhaps the ablest satirist of the radical<br />

[16]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!