HEINRICH HEINE - Repositories
HEINRICH HEINE - Repositories HEINRICH HEINE - Repositories
xxxviii S^ntrotiuctton. to seek. We had neither the German wealth of ideas, nor the French enthusiasm for applying ideas. There reigned in the mass of the nation that inveterate inaccessibility to ideas, that Philistinism,— to use the German nickname,— which reacts even on the individual genius that is exempt from it. In our greatest literary epoch, that of the Elizabethan age, English society at large was accessible to ideas, was permeated by them, was vivified by them, to a degree which has never been reached in England since. Hence the unique greatness in English literature of Shakspeare and his contemporaries. They were powerfully upheld by the intellectual life of their nation; they applied freely in literature the then modern ideas, — the ideas of the Renascence and the Reformation. A few years afterwards the great English middle class, the kernel of the nation, the class whose intelligent sympathy had upheld a Shakespare, entered the prison of Puritanism, and had the key turned on its spirit there for two hundred years. He enlargeth a nation, says Job, and straiteneth it again. In the literary movement of the beginning of the nineteenth century the signal attempt to apply freely the modern spirit was made in England by two members of the aristocratic class, Byron and Shelley. Aristocracies are, as such, naturally impenetrable by ideas;
S'ntrotiuctton. xxxix but their individual members have a high courage and a turn for breaking bounds; and a man of genius, who is the born child of the idea, happening to be born in the aristocratic ranks, chafes against the obstacles which prevent him from freely developing it. But Byron and Shelley did not succeed in their attempt freely to apply the modern spiri^ in English literature ; they could not succeed in it; the resistance to baffle them, the want of intelligent sympathy to guide and uphold them, were too great. Their literary creation, compared with the literary creation of Shakspeare and Spenser, compared with the literary creation of Goethe and Heine, is a failure. The best literary creation of that time in England proceeded from men who did not make the same bold attempt as Byron and Shelley. What, in fact, was the career of the chief English men of letters, their contemporaries ? The gravest of them, Wordsworth, retired (in Middle-Age phrase) into a monastery. I mean, he plunged himself in the inward life, he voluntarily cut himself off from the modern spirit. Coleridge took to opium. Scott became the historiographer-royal of feudalism. Keats passionately gave himself up to a sensuous genius, to his faculty for interpreting nature ; and he died of consumption at twenty-five. Wordsworth, Soott, and Keats have left admirable works; far more solid and complete works than
- Page 278 and 279: Decked with gold and arrayed in pur
- Page 283: HEINE.
- Page 287 and 288: Edited by NEWELL DUNBAR HEINRICH HE
- Page 289 and 290: EDITOR'S PREFACE. THE reading publi
- Page 291: ^Un^tvation^. PAGE HEINE IN 1827 .
- Page 294 and 295: Vlll €ontattie?* \'RTOR III GO TH
- Page 296 and 297: €ontentier* THE POWER OI- WOMEN .
- Page 298 and 299: xn Contrntief. PERFECT HAPPINESS TH
- Page 300 and 301: XIV 4rontentie(* THE POET'S IMPARTI
- Page 302 and 303: The spirit of the woild Belioklinf^
- Page 304 and 305: xvi S^ntrotiuction, in discharging
- Page 306 and 307: xviii ^Tntrotiuction, Avhich of Goe
- Page 308 and 309: XX SFntrobuctioit, task of dissolut
- Page 310 and 311: xxii 5ntrot»uction» whose revolut
- Page 313 and 314: ^'ntrotmttton. xxlii Efforts have b
- Page 315 and 316: 3Pntrotiuction, xxv cause it was pr
- Page 317 and 318: S'nttOtniCttOtU xxvii and he shows
- Page 319 and 320: S^ntroliuction* xxix and courtiers
- Page 321 and 322: ^Tntrotiuction. xxxi "' Am I then r
- Page 323 and 324: ^Fntrotjuctiom xxxiii went on compo
- Page 325 and 326: Itootmtttott. XXXV his subject-matt
- Page 327: STntroductton. xxxvli mon school-bo
- Page 331 and 332: ^Fntrotiuctton, xll France Heine jo
- Page 333 and 334: ^Fntroliuction. xliil people of gen
- Page 335 and 336: 3FntroDuction» xlv reward, as alwa
- Page 337 and 338: 3^ntrotmctiom xlvii they crouched i
- Page 339 and 340: 3^ntrotiuction» xllx and politely
- Page 341 and 342: ^Fntrotiuction* whom he conquers th
- Page 343 and 344: ^Fntrobuction* liii all the scatter
- Page 345 and 346: S^ntroDuction, Iv entertaining hers
- Page 347 and 348: 3Fntrotiu(tion« Ivii (and posterit
- Page 349: WIT, WISDOM, POETRY.
- Page 352 and 353: ^eine* none is so trusty as the tru
- Page 354 and 355: I^eine* That I might love embrace r
- Page 356 and 357: I^eine, thoughts, with which the sp
- Page 358 and 359: 8 ^eim. PHILOSOPHY AND REVOLUTION.
- Page 360 and 361: lo ijeine. which indeed is almost i
- Page 362 and 363: 12 ^tine. though the learning of it
- Page 364 and 365: 14 i$tmt. I always told thee I shou
- Page 366 and 367: 16 f^tint. THE COMING FRAY. The mus
- Page 368 and 369: 18 i^eine* VICTOR HUGO. Victor Hugo
- Page 370 and 371: 20 i^cine. Who twines in one wreath
- Page 372 and 373: 22 i$tmt. Plucks from His head the
- Page 374 and 375: 24 J^eine, SHAKESPEARE. Generous Na
- Page 376 and 377: 26 i^etne. CHRIST. Christ is the Go
S'ntrotiuctton.<br />
xxxix<br />
but their individual members have a high<br />
courage and a turn for breaking bounds;<br />
and a man of genius, who is the born<br />
child of the idea, happening to be born<br />
in the aristocratic ranks, chafes against<br />
the obstacles which prevent him from<br />
freely developing it. But Byron and<br />
Shelley did not succeed in their attempt<br />
freely to apply the modern spiri^ in<br />
English literature ; they could not succeed<br />
in it; the resistance to baffle them,<br />
the want of intelligent sympathy to<br />
guide and uphold them, were too great.<br />
Their literary creation, compared with<br />
the literary creation of Shakspeare and<br />
Spenser, compared with the literary<br />
creation of Goethe and Heine, is a failure.<br />
The best literary creation of that<br />
time in England proceeded from men<br />
who did not make the same bold attempt<br />
as Byron and Shelley. What, in fact,<br />
was the career of the chief English men<br />
of letters, their contemporaries ? The<br />
gravest of them, Wordsworth, retired<br />
(in Middle-Age phrase) into a monastery.<br />
I mean, he plunged himself in<br />
the inward life, he voluntarily cut himself<br />
off from the modern spirit. Coleridge<br />
took to opium. Scott became<br />
the historiographer-royal of feudalism.<br />
Keats passionately gave himself up to a<br />
sensuous genius, to his faculty for interpreting<br />
nature ; and he died of consumption<br />
at twenty-five. Wordsworth, Soott,<br />
and Keats have left admirable works;<br />
far more solid and complete works than