Suggested Solutions to Assignment 4 (Optional) - Trent University
Suggested Solutions to Assignment 4 (Optional) - Trent University
Suggested Solutions to Assignment 4 (Optional) - Trent University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ln Q 61 = 1.2789 − 0.1647(0.47) + 0.5115(1.29) + 0.1483(0.07) − 0.0089(61)<br />
− 0.0961(1) − 0.1570(0) − 0.0097(0)<br />
ln Q 61 = 1.2327. The antilog of 1.2312 is 3.43 lb.<br />
This is the forecasted number of pounds of coffee consumed per capita for the<br />
population over age 16 in the first quarter of 1978.<br />
(d) By substituting the given values of the independent or explana<strong>to</strong>ry variables,<br />
t = 62, D 1 = D 3 = 0, and D 2 = 1, for the second quarter of 1978 in the estimated<br />
demand equation, we get the second-quarter 1978 forecast of the demand for coffee<br />
ln Q 62 = 1.2789 − 0.1647(0.38) + 0.5115(1.30) + 0.1483(0.05) − 0.0089(62)<br />
− 0.0961(0) − 0.1570(1) − 0.0097(0)<br />
ln Q 62 = 1.1799. The antilog of 1.1799 is 3.25 lb.<br />
This is the forecasted number of pounds of coffee consumed per capita for the<br />
population over age 16 in the second quarter of 1978.<br />
(e) Since the estimated regression equation seems <strong>to</strong> fit the data reasonably well (it<br />
explains 80 percent of the variation in Q t ) and we are using it <strong>to</strong> forecast Q t for<br />
the next four quarters only, we can be reasonably confident in our forecast.<br />
A sudden and unforeseen change in tastes (due, for example, <strong>to</strong> the finding that coffee<br />
causes heart ailments) could cause the forecasted error <strong>to</strong> become very large. In that<br />
case, the regression equation would have <strong>to</strong> be reestimated <strong>to</strong> reflect this structural<br />
change before we could use it <strong>to</strong> generate forecasts in which we could have a great<br />
deal of confidence.<br />
119