26.12.2013 Views

Adaptivity with moving grids

Adaptivity with moving grids

Adaptivity with moving grids

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 C. J. Budd, W. Huang and R. D. Russell<br />

arising in shocks or localized singularities, it is usually necessary to use a<br />

more sophisticated <strong>moving</strong> mesh equation to avoid mesh instabilities.<br />

In one dimension two possible equations for the mesh are the <strong>moving</strong><br />

mesh PDEs MMPDE5 and MMPDE6, given by<br />

ɛx t =(Mx ξ ) ξ , −ɛx ξξt =(Mx ξ ) ξ . (5.12)<br />

Suppose that these are used to solve a system which has intrinsic solution,<br />

length and time scales given respectively by U, L and T and a derived scale Λ<br />

for the monitor function M. As the computational variable ξ is independent<br />

of scale, the left-hand side of each of these two MMPDEs scales as L/T and<br />

the right-hand side as ΛL. These two balance (so that the mesh evolves at<br />

the same rate as the underlying solution) provided that<br />

1<br />

=Λ. (5.13)<br />

T<br />

Observe that this condition is independent of the spatial length scale L. The<br />

implication of this is that if the monitor function M(u, x) depends upon u<br />

and x, then this satisfies (5.13) provided that<br />

M(Uu,Lx)= 1 M(u, x). (5.14)<br />

T<br />

This is a more severe condition than the condition (5.14) for MMPDE1,<br />

but is necessary to ensure that the mesh calculation does not destabilize the<br />

calculation of the solution of the PDE. It has the useful property that it often<br />

gives a precise characterization of the necessary form of the monitor function<br />

appropriate to one scaling transformation. A disadvantage of this approach<br />

is, however, that it may not always (or indeed generally) be possible to<br />

capture all possible scaling transformations in a single monitor function<br />

satisfying (5.14). Thus some aprioriknowledge of the expected solution<br />

behaviour might be necessary in this case.<br />

As an example we will consider the radially symmetric solutions of the<br />

cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation. This equation has the form<br />

iu t + u rr + n − 1 u r + u|u| 2 =0, (5.15)<br />

r<br />

where r = |x| and n is the spatial dimension. If n ≥ 2 this can have solutions<br />

which develop singularities (in amplitude and phase) in a finite time. The<br />

equation (5.15) is invariant under the action of the scaling group<br />

t → λt, r → λ 1/2 r u → λ −1/2 u,<br />

as well as the unitary multiplicative group<br />

t → t, r → r, u → e iφ u, φ ∈ R.<br />

This system develops singularities in a finite time T <strong>with</strong> a natural time

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!