Adaptivity with moving grids
Adaptivity with moving grids
Adaptivity with moving grids
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Adaptivity</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>moving</strong> <strong>grids</strong> 67<br />
consider the bottom boundary of the square in the physical domain, for<br />
which Y = 0. A grid line Γ which intersects this side is given by<br />
Γ={(x, y) :0≤ η ≤ 1, ξ fixed}.<br />
The tangent to this line in the physical domain is given by τ =(x η ,y η ) T ,<br />
and, trivially, the tangent to the bottom boundary of the square by the vector<br />
t =(1, 0) T . However, on the bottom boundary, the function P satisfies<br />
the identity P η (ξ,0) = 0 and by definition x = P ξ . It follows immediately<br />
that when η =0,<br />
x η (ξ,0) = P ηξ (ξ,0) = 0,<br />
so that on the lower boundary τ · t = 0. Thus the mesh is orthogonal<br />
to the lower boundary. Similar results apply to the other sides as well.<br />
The condition of mesh orthogonality at the boundary of the square is often<br />
desirable in certain circumstances (Thompson et al. 1985). However, it<br />
may cause problems when resolving features, such as fronts, which intersect<br />
boundaries at an angle. In such cases it may be useful to refine the mesh<br />
close to the boundary, either by introducing a finer computational mesh<br />
there, or by locally increasing the value of the monitor function M at mesh<br />
points adjacent to the boundary.<br />
Mesh symmetries. Some very desirable properties of the mesh follow immediately<br />
from the properties of the Monge–Ampère equation. It is trivial<br />
to see that the equation is invariant under translations in (ξ,η). It is<br />
also easy to see that (in a similar manner to the Laplacian operator) the<br />
Monge–Ampère equation is also invariant under any orthogonal map such<br />
as a rotation or a reflection This is because the Monge–Ampère equation<br />
is the determinant of the Hessian, which transforms covariantly under such<br />
maps. This simple observation implies that (away from boundaries) the<br />
meshes generated by solving the Monge–Ampère equation should have no<br />
difficulty aligning themselves to structures, such as shocks, which may occur<br />
anywhere in a domain and at any orientation. It is immediate that the<br />
Monge–Ampère equation is also invariant under scaling transformations of<br />
the form ξ → λξ, η → µη, P → νP, provided that M is chosen carefully.<br />
Mesh skewness. The regularity of the mesh generated by this approach gives<br />
a useful feature in seeing control in the variation of the element size across<br />
the domain. In general the meshes generated by the Monge–Ampère equation<br />
have good regularity properties and are effective in interpolating functions<br />
(Delzanno et al. 2008). It is possible to make some estimates for the<br />
resulting skewness of the mesh in terms of the properties of the function P .<br />
Consider a two-dimensional problem for which the map from Ω C to Ω P has